COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report
GE13008494
Table of Contents
Case Details
Accused Detail
Accused list:
Accused
Charge Detail
Summary...
Key Informatiot
Antecedents..
Summary of Evidence...
Analysis of Evidence / Identification of Accuse
Remarks...
Further Enquiries.
Production Detail
Reporting Officer.
MURTAZA RASUL
Witness 8 (Police): DIANNE WILSON
Witness 9 (Police): KENNY SHAW
Witness 10 (Police): DAVID MORRISON
Witness 11 (Police): NICOLA HOPE
Witness 12 (Police): ALLAN DUFF
Previous Convictions.
Soundex..
Supervisor...
Witness Details.
Unavailability.
Witness list: .
Witness 1 (Civilian):
Witness 2 (Civilian):
Witness 3 (Civilian):
Witness 4 (Civilian):
Witness 5 (Civilian) t buenemeecneennnnn
Witness 6 (Civilian): ROBERT DAILY
Witness 7 (Police): CRAIG PATERSON
8
9
.20
.29
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
1. Case Details
1.1 General Information
Reported by : STRATHCLYDE POLICE
Sent to : Fiscal
Case category : COMMON LAW
Case number : GE13008494
Lead incident number : PSPBD00290412 Report date : 10-04-2013
Prejudice incident :No Date of first offence =: 24-06-2011
Document type :SPR Document status : Report
1.2 List of Accused
1.2.1 Accused 1: MURTAZA RASUL
SCRO Number : $33871/03K Undertaking date: None noted.
Date of Birth Gender : Male
Disclosable address
1.3 List of Police Witnesses with Misconduct Marker
There are no police witnesses with a misconduct indicator.
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
2. Accused Details
2.1 Accused number 1: MURTAZA RASUL
SCRO number : $33871/03K Gender
Date of birth Age
Status :R Ethnicity
Occupation info : RETAIL
Disclosable address :/ “GRO
Additional Information
Sexual Offenders Register
Prejudice incident
Means to pay rating
Means to pay note
Contact details
Local Police Division : GOVAN POLICE OFFICE
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
3. Charge Details
3.1 Charge Number 1
3.1.1 Details
Incident number: PSPBD00290412
on Between 24th June 2011 and 6th March 2012 BETWEEN THE INCLUSIVE DATES at Carmyle Post
Office, Gardenside Avenue, Glasgow you MURTAZA RASUL did pretend td “GRO 4 c/
o Shettleston Police Office, 1051 Shettleston Road, Gisagow that you conducted 7 x cash withdrawal
transactions vi ic count for the sum of £150 on each occasion and did thus
induce said to input her Personal Identification Number into automated system whilst
in the belie g the sum of £150, you did this knowing in fact that you were processing
a withdrawal transaction of £600, thereby stealing £450 on each occasion, having provided i
ith £150 as requested in each transaction and did thus obtain £3150 in cash by fraud
Related narrative : Fraud
Modifier : NO MODIFIER
Known date : 20-02-2013
Property value: £3150.00 Compensation: Yes
required
Loss amount :£3150.00 Recovered : £0.00
amount
3.1.2 Subject(s)
3.1.2.1 MURTAZA RASUL
SCRO number : $3387 1/03K Caution date =: 20-02-2013
Admitted Charge :N Aggravator : NO AGGRAVATION
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
4. Summary
4.1 Key Information
4.2 Antecedents
The now accused Murtaza Rasul is 35 years of age having been born o
The accused is employed as a Sub-Post Master at Carmyle Post Office, Carmyle, Glasgow where he
has held the position for a period of approximately 10 years. The accused receives a remuneration
package from Post Office Ltd of approximately: i
4.3 Summary of Evidence
4.3.1 Description of locus
The locus of the charge libelled is Carmyle Post Office which is situated within the residential area of
Carmyle in Glasgow's East End.
The locus is a sub-post office which provides a service to the local community within the Carmyle area
and allows patrons to conduct their financial transactions locally as opposed to travelling out-with.
The locus has internal CCTV coverage however during the course of enquiries it was established that
the CCTV system retains footage for a period of approximately 4 days.
4.3.2 Description of event
BACKGROUND
Between 8 June 2010 and 2 April 2012, three reports of Fraud were made to Police, all of which
were alleged to have occurred at Carmyle Post Office. The complainers in these incidents were
elderly females who held Post Office Accounts and conducted their withdrawals/transactions utilising
a withdrawal card and Personal Identification Number. Each complainer had an amount of money
withdrawn from their Post Office Accounts without their consent or knowledge. All complainers
conducted their associated business at Carmyle Post Office - Crime Report Nos PSPBD01710610,
PSPBD01040810 and PSPBD00290412 refer.
PSPBD01710610
The complainer, the witnessI = GRO} 87), was the holder of Post Office Account No! GRO.
Prior to 13 April 2010, the account balance was £17,114.81. It was later established through
~5-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
interrogation of Post Office statements relating to this account that between 13 April 2010 and 27 May
2010, 30 x withdrawals of £600 (six hundred pounds) had been taken from the account.
Through enquiries made by family members it was established that 4 x withdrawals of £600 were
i i r, 26 x transactions of £600 were conducted witho it
All transactions were carried out using Card N
son, the witnes: 3, reported the discrepancies
to same was carried out and statements were later noted from members
family. A statement was also noted from the Sub-Postmaster at Carmyle
Post Office, now know! accused Murtaza Rasul. During his statement, the accused Rasul stated
he recalled the witness! having attended for a period of a few weeks to withdraw money
from her account whilst accompanied by family members. Further enquiries carried out with members of
the witness family confirmed the witness ad attended at the Post Office,
however not for the prolonged period described by the accused Rasul.
LABEL: 1 X PO ACCOUNT CARD SIGNED:
LABEL: 1 X PO ACCOUNT STATEMENT
LABEL: 1 X POST OFFICE RECEIPT
were also seized. Statements were also noted from relatives of the accused Rasul who had been
covering periods of annual leave taken by the accused.
PSPBD01040810
The complainer, the witness J
On 30 April 2010, the balance of this account was £13,318.43. It was established through interrogation
of Post Office statements relating to this account that between 7 May 2010 and 2 June 2010, 19 x
withdrawals totalling £11,400 were carried out from the account without the knowledge of consent of the
account holder, the witness,
son, the witness attended at Carmyle Post Office to report the
matter and han Post Office Account Card which his mother had in her possession. At that
time the witness }was informed that the Post Office Card was in fact an unregistered card
and he was advised by staff (not further described) to destroy the card, which he did. The location of the
true card has not been established. A new card was issued on 21 June 2010 and it was noted no further
fraudulent transactions occurred since that date.
On 6 August 2010, the witnes:
was noted from the witness:
seized
ontacted the Police to report the matter. A statement
yy the Police witnesses Morrison and Hope at which time they
LABEL: POST OFFICE STATEMENT OF,
The Police witness Paterson conducted further enquiry into the incident, which included close
partnership working with the witness Robert Daily, Security Manager of Post Office Ltd.
Various enquiries were carried out and the Police witness Paterson deponed for and obtained
LABEL: GLASGOW SHERIFF WARRANT
which granted Police the authority to interrogate Clydesdale Bank Account N
jointly by the now accused Murtaza Rasul and his wife.
held
LABEL: COPIES OF CLYDESDALE BANK STATEMENT, ACCOUNT NO
MURTAZA RASUL
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
were obtained as a result. On closer inspection of the aforementioned statement, it was observed that
between 13 April id 6th August 2010, a total of § ‘was deposited into the account. It
was noted that £_ related to Tax Credits.
st 2010 and 31 December 2010 a total
relating to Tax Credits.
On closer in spection of the account, it was noted between 6 A\
‘was further deposited into the account, with g
Further enquiry was carried out with the assistance of the witness Daily of Post Office Ltd.
LABEL:COPIES OF MONTHLY POST OFFICE REMUNERATION - MURTAZA
RASUL
were generated. It was noted that between April 2010 and August 2010, the accused received a net
salary totalling from Post Office Ltd.
On 12 October 2011, the accused Murtaza Rasul attended at Shettleston Police Office in order to
assist with enquiries. The accused provided a statement which detailed his personal finances. At the
conclusion of the statement the exact m been withdrawn from each Post
Office Account relating to the witnesse “Icould not be established.
PSPBD00290412
The complainer, the witness! (86), was the holder of Post Office Account No
Prior to 24 June 2017, the balance of this account was £4,544.38. It was later established
through interrogation of Post Office statements relating to this account that between 24 June 2011 and
6 March 2012, 7 x withdrawals of £600 (totalling £4,200) had been taken from the account without the
knowledge or consent of the witness.
On 2 April 2012, the witness: icontacted Police to report the incident. The Police witness Alan
Duff subsequently attended at her home address and noted details for a Crime Report, during which the
Police witness Duff seized
LABEL: 1 x POST OFFICE CARD NO:
LABEL: POST OFFICE STATEMENTS
The Police witness Paterson conducted further enquiries into the incident and further liaised with the
witness Daily, Security Manager of Post Office Ltd.
About 1100 hours on 27 April 2012, the Police witness Paterson accompanied by the witness Daly
attended at the witness; home address. A statement was noted from the witness:
who confirmed she had attended at Carmyle Post Office and had been served on each occasion by
a male staff member she knows as "Danny" (confirmed as the accused Murtaza Rasul). The witness
inserted her Post Office Card, Account No, into the Horizon Automated
System, when prompted she entered her Personal Identification Number (PIN) and verbally asked the
staff member for the sum of £150. The witness) eceived the sum of £150 on each occasion,
however did not receive a receipt on the dates where the sums of £600 had been recorded on the Post
Office Account.
About 1445 hours on 13 August 2012, the witness Daly attended at Shettleston Police Office where he
provided a self-written statement to the Police witness Paterson which related to the operation of the
Horizon Automated System. From this statement it was established that the Horizon Automated System
could be manipulated in such a way that would allow a customer to key in their Personal Identification
Number, request the sum of £150, however at the vendor side the staff member would have the option
to press "Withdraw Limit" from the touch screen panel. To confirm the transaction, the customer would
again be prompted to re-enter their Personal Identification Number. The vendor would then hand over
the originally requested sum of £150, however by selecting the "Withdraw Limit" option this would allow
a withdrawal limit of £600 (providing there were sufficient funds available), thereby the vendor would
~7-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
have the opportunity to steal the amount of £450 without the customer's knowledge. No receipt would be
issued as this would reflect the actual transaction of £600.
About 0840 hours on 20 February 2013, the Police witnesses Paterson and Dianne Wilson traced the
accused Murtaza Rasul at Gardenside Avenue, Glasgow at which time he was detained under terms of
Section 14 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. The accused made no comment at that time.
The accused was thereafter conveyed to Maryhill Police Office where his arrival was timed at 0920
hours, same date.
The grounds for the accused's detention were accepted by the Duty Officer. The accused was
processed and
LABEL: FORM 5:67:1A
was completed.
Between 0936 hours and 0937 hours, same date, the Police witness Paterson, in the presence of the
Police witness Wilson, informed the accused Rasul of his rights to have access to a solicitor prior to
Police interview, at which time the accused declined the offer of a private consultation prior to interview
and signed
LABEL: SARF
to confirm his decision.
Between 1015 hours and 1203 hours, same date, the accused Rasul was interviewed under tape
recorded conditions within Interview Room No 2 of Maryhill Police Office by the Police witnesses
Paterson and Wilson. Tape Ref No BE13020186 refers.
At 1200 hours, same date, the accused was informed he was no longer a detained person and was
under arrest. The accused was thereafter cautioned and charged as libelled by the Police witness
Paterson, in the presence of the Police witness Wilson, and his reply noted.
At the conclusion of the interview, the accused Rasul was removed to the Charge Bar where he was
informed of his rights as an arrested person.
The accused was informed that matters would be subject of a report to the Procurator Fiscal and was
later liberated.
About 1215 hours, same date, the Police witness Paterson seized
LABEL: FORM 5:67:1A
LABEL: FORM 5:67:1B
LABEL: FORM 5:67:2
LABEL: PI TAPE REF NO BE13020186
which were later lodged at Shettleston Police Office in the normal manner.
4.3.3 Medical evidence
N/A
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
4.3.4 Interview
Between 1015 hours and 1203 hours, same date, the accused Rasul was interviewed under tape
recorded conditions within Interview Room No 2 of Maryhill Police Office by the Police witnesses
Paterson and Wilson.
The accused displayed a thorough working knowledge of the Horizon automated system used within the
Post Office commensurate with his position. The accused agreed that the suspected method used to
withdraw monies from the witness” Post Office account was a possible procedure. However,
he denied all allegations put to him.
A full transcript is available at the request of the Procurator Fiscal, Tape Reference BE13020186 refers.
4.3.5 Caution and charge/reply
Between 1015 hours and 1203 hours, same date, the accused Rasul was interviewed under tape
recorded conditions within Interview Room No 2 of Maryhill Police Office.
At 1200 hours, same date, the accused was informed he was no longer a detained person and was
under arrest. The accused was thereafter cautioned and charged as libelled by the Police witness
Paterson, in the presence of the Police witness Wilson.
The accused stated he fully understood the charge to which he replied, "YEH, IT WASN'T, I DIDN'T DO
IT THE WAY YOU'RE SAYING THATS WHAT HAPPENED. I BELIEVE THE CUSTOMER WITHDREW
THAT MONEY AND MISPLACED THE RECEIPT SOMEWHERE BECAUSE RECEIPTS WERE
ISSUED ON EVERY SINGLE TIME AS THEY ARE WITH EVERY SINGLE TRANSACTION."
At the conclusion of the interview, the accused Rasul was removed to the Charge Bar where he was
informed of his rights as an arrested person.
The accused was informed that matters would be subject of a report to the Procurator Fiscal and was
later liberated.
4.4 Analysis of evidence / Identification of accused
is retired, she suffers from dementia resulting in memory loss, she speaks
to being the holder of Post Office account at Carmyle Post Office. She further speaks to having funds
in excess of £17,000 within her account prior to observing multiple withdrawals from her account all of
which had been without her knowledge or consent, to providing statement to the Police.
She cannot identify the accused.
is retired, he speaks to being the witnes: } son and to the
funds in excess of £17,000 within his mothers Post Office account prior to observing a number of
withdrawals from his mothers Post Office account.
He cannot identify the accused.
The witness! _ is retired, she suffers from dementia resulting in memory loss, she speaks
to being the holder of Post Office account at Carmyle Post Office, she speaks to having in excess of
£11,000 in her Post Office she thereafter observed a number of transactions had been carried out on her
account without her knowledge or consent.
She cannot identify the accused.
The witness; """GRO___!is unemployed, he speaks to being the witness! ~____I Son, to his
mother having in excess of £11, 000 in her Post Office prior to observing an mber of iransactions had
~9-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
been carried out on her account without her knowledge or consent, to attending at Carmyle Post Office
speaking to staff and being informed of having possession of an un-registered Post Office account card,
to providing a statement to Police.
He cannot identify the accused.
is retired, she speaks to being the holder of Post Office account account
at Carmyle Post Office, she speaks to having in excess of £4000 in her Post Office account, she
thereafter observed a number of transactions had been carried out on her account which were £600 on
the dates which she had attended at the Carmyle Post Office where she had received the sum of £150
on each occasion which no receipt was issued, to providing statement to Police.
She can identify the accused again.
The witness Robert Daily is employed as a Security Manager with Post Office Ltd, he speaks to assisting
Police with enquiries in relation to all three reports of Fraud having occurred at locus, to providing
technical knowledge of the operation of the Horizon automated system to the reporting officer in order
to progress the enquiry and provide sufficency of evidence, to providing a statement to the Police. The
witness Daily should be considered as an expert in the operation of the Horizon automated system.
He can identify the accused again.
k
The Police witness Patersot
ducting enquiries into all three incidents, to obtaining a
statement from the witness: and various family members, to noting statements from the
accused (prior to when he wi , to deponing for and obtaining a Glasgow Sheriff warrant to
facilitate interogation of the Clydesdale Bank account held by Murtaza Rasul, to liasing with the witness
Daily in relation to the operation of the Horizon automated system, to the detention, interview, arrest,
caution and charge of the accused, replies made by him and productions seized.
He can identify the accused again
The Police witness Wilson speaks to the detention, interview, arrest, caution and charge of the accused,
replies made by him.
She can identify the accused again.
The Police witness Shaw speaks to obtaining a statement from the witness, GRO
He cannot identify the accused.
The Police witnesses Morrison
to seizing a copy of the witness
peak to obtaining a statement from the witness
Post Office account.
They cannot identify the accused.
The Police witness Duff speaks to speaking with the witness
report, to seizing her Post Office account card and statement.
and obtaining details for a Crime
He cannot identify the accused.
4.5 Remarks
The accused has held the position of Sub-Post master at locus for approximately 10 years. In relation to
the first two occurrences the method by which the monies were taken from each account is cannot be
established at time of submission of this report. It should be noted that all three complainers are elderly
-10-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
females in their eighties and have lost significant portions of their savings as a result of these despicable
acts.
The witness Daily (Post Office Security Manager) has highlighted a method by which the Horizon
automated system can be manipulated to conduct the theft of monies by fraudulent means as
documented within the description of events. A full statement in relation to same has been obtained from
the witness Daily which explains in depth as to how this would be done.
Statement's have been noted from members of the witnes: family. They have not been
added as witnesses in the case meantime and are available for perusal at your request.
Throughout the tape recorded interview the accused displayed a thorough working knowledge of the
Horizon automated system used within the Post Office commensurate with his position. The accused
agreed that the method used to withdraw monies from a Post Office account as described previously by
the witness Daily was possible. However, he denied all allegations put to him.
4.6 Further Enquiries
It should be noted the accused was interviewed in relation to all three occurances of Fraud howver it was
deemed there was insuficent evidence to libel any charges in relation to the first two occurances namely
PSPBD01710610 and PSPBD01040810. The reporting officer will conduct any further enquiries should
any further instructions be issued by the Procurator Fiscal.
~11-
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
5. Production Details
5.1 Production number 1
Production no. 1
Type : LABEL IN LIEU
Description : 1x PO account card signed
Photograph >No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner
Agency register no. : 07/6085/11
5.2 Production number 2
Production no. 72
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : 1x PO account statement
Photograph >No
Location ice Office
Owner
Agency register no.
5.3 Production number 3
Production no. 73
Type : LABEL IN LIEU
Description : 1 x Post Office receipt
Photograph >No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner
Agency register no. : 07/6087/11
5.4 Production number 4
Production no. 24
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : Glasgow Sheriff Warrant
Photograph :No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. : 07/6088/11
5.5 Production number 5
Production no. 15
Type : DOCUMENTATION ,
Description : Copies of Clydesdale Bank account}
Photograph >No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. : 07/6089/11
Murtaza Rasul
-12-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
5.6 Production number 6
Production no. 76
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description :PO statement of/ "GRO
Photograph PNO nnn
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner I
Agency register no. : O7/6090/11
5.7 Production number 7
Production no. :7
Type : LABEL IN LIEU
Description : 1 x Post Office card ni
Photograph :No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner
Agency registerno. : 07/4457/12
5.8 Production number 8
Production no. :8
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : Post office statements
Photograph :No
Location : ffice
Owner
Agency register no.
5.9 Production number 9
Production no. :9
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : Copies of monthly Post Office remuneration - Murtaza Rasul
Photograph :No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. —: 07/6530/11
5.10 Production number 10
Production no. 210
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : Statement of witness Robert Daily
Photograph :No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency registerno. —: 07/1859/13
5.11 Production number 11
Production no. 211
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : SARF
-13-
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Photograph :No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. = 07/1860/13
5.12 Production number 12
Production no. 212
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : Form 5.67.1A
Photograph :No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. : 07/1861/13
5.13 Production number 13
Production no. 213
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : Form 5.67.1B
Photograph :No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. : 07/1862/13
5.14 Production number 14
Production no. 214
Type : DOCUMENTATION
Description : Form 5.67.2
Photograph >No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. : 07/1863/13
5.15 Production number 15
Production no. 215
Type : LABEL IN LIEU
Description : Pl tape ref. BE13020186 (2 off)
Photograph >No
Location : Shettleston Police Office
Owner : Police
Agency register no. : 07/1864/13
~14-
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
6. Reporting Officer
Name : CRAIG PATERSON
Station : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
Rank IVE CONSTABLE
Officer unique no. i
Shoulder No.
7. Supervisor
Name : MARK LOVE
Station : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
Rank : POLICE CONSTABLE
Officer unique no.
Shoulder No. : BO674
-15-
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
8. Witness Details
8.1 Unavailability
Police witness 7: CRAIG PATERSON
From 11-04-2013 to 24-04-2013
From 27-07-2013 to 16-08-2013
Police witness 8: DIANNE WILSON
From 29-04-2013 to 09-05-2013
From 04-07-2013 to 24-07-2013
From 09-11-2013 to 24-11-2013
8.2 Civilian witnesses
Witness number SCRO number
Date of birth } Age
Gender : Female Ethnicity
Occupation : Retired
Hostile witness :No
Disclosable address
Cite address
Contact details
Telephone number
Local Police Division
Telephone number
Local Police Division
Witness number SCRO number
Date of birth Age
Gender Ethnicity
Occupation
Hostile witness
Disclosable address
Vulnerability category
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
Cite address
Contact details
Telephone number
Local Police Division OLICE OFFICE
Telephone number
Mobile number
Witness number SCRO number
Date of birth Age
Gender : Female Ethnicity
Occupation : RETIRED
Hostile witness :No Vulnerability category
_. specifics
Disclosable address :
Cite address \ H
Contact details
Telephone number
Local Police Division
CONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
Telephone number
Local Police Division : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
8.2.4
Witness number SCRO number
Date of birth Age
Gender : Ethnicity
Occupation : UNEMPLOYED
Hostile witness
No
Disclosable address ~
RO!
Vulnerability category {
Cite address
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
Contact details
GRO
INDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
Telephone number:
Local Police Division : L'
Telephone number
Local Police Division : MOTHERWELL POLICE OFFICE
Witness number SCRO number
Date of birth Age
Gender Ethnicity
Occupation : RETIRED
Hostile witness Vulnerability category
Disclosable address i
Cite address G RO
Contact details
Telephone number
Local Police Division : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
Telephone number
8.2.6 ROBERT DAILY
Witness number SCRO number
Date of birth Age
Gender Ethnicity
Occupation : SECURITY MANAGER
Hostile witness erability category I
Disclosable address
Cite address El G RO :
Contact details
Telephone number
Local Police Division : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
Mobile number
Local Police Division : HAMILTON POLICE OFFICE
-18-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
8.3 Police witnesses
8.3.1 CRAIG PATERSON
Witness number Family Liaison =: No
Unique number Shoulder number :
Misconduct i a Ethnicity
Rank : DETECTIVE CONSTABLE
Station : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
8.3.2 DIANNE WILSON
Witness number
Unique number
Family Liaison
Shoulder number
Misconduct Ethnicity
Rank : DETECTIVE CONSTABLE
Station : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
8.3.3 KENNY SHAW
Witness number
Unique number
Misconduct
Rank
Station
Family Liaison
Shoulder number
Ethnicity
8.3.4 DAVID MORRISON
Witness number :10 Family Liaison
Unique number RO i Shoulder number
Misconduct sed Ethnicity
Rank POLICE CONSTABLE
Station : WISHAW POLICE OFFICE
8.3.5 NICOLA HOPE
Witness number Family Liaison —: No
Unique number Shoulder number : N556
Misconduct i Ethnicity
Rank : POLICE CONSTABLE
Station : WISHAW POLICE OFFICE
8.3.6 ALLAN DUFF
Witness number
Unique number
Family Liaison
Shoulder number
Misconduct tt } Ethnicity
Rank : POLICE CONSTABLE
Station : LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
-19-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
9. Previous Convictions
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
~22-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
-23-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
~24-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
~25-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
-~27-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
-28-
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
Standard Prosecution Report - GE13008494
-29-
Standard Prosecution Report - Backing Sheet
COPF0000118
COPF0000118
PF Ref: GE13008494
Accused Lead Incident Number: PSPBD00290412
MURTAZA RASUL Reporting Officer: CRAIG PATERSON
Rank: DETECTIVE CONSTABLE
Station: LONDON ROAD POLICE OFFICE
Offence(s) Shoulder Number: B1110
Fraud
-30-