FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Davidson James[/O=EXCHANGE/OU=ADMINGROUP1/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVIDSONJ2]
Tue 27/03/2012 10:58:45 AM (UTC)
Thomas Penny. GRO,
Peter[:
Jenkins Gareth G' GRO
RE: RM v Bramwell Specifically - Horizon Integrity in General
Thanks, I’ve asked Howard to escalate.
James Davidson
Delivery Executive
Post Office Account
Fujitsu
Lovelace Road, Bracknell. Berkshire, RG12 8SN
Mobile: j GR
vA Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
From: Thomas Penny
Sent: 27 March 2012 11:49
To: Thompson Peter; Davidson James
Cc: Jenkins Gareth GI;
Munro Donna
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell Specifically - Horizon Integrity in General
Pete / James
Please be advised that it is highly unlikey that the appropriate funding will be in place in time for Gareth to respond to
POL legal as requested in this mailstring. I send to you for information and in the event of any fallout as a result.
Kind regards
Penny
From: Smith Robert
Sent: 26 March 2012 11:21
To: Thomas Penny
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
FYI,
From: Ravi Dudala {”
Sent: 26 March 2012 10:49
To: Bruce Tann
Cc: Smith Robert
Subject: RE: RM v Bramwell
Bruce,
Yes, Mark Dinsdale in the Security team is in the process of getting a PO raised for this.
Best Regards,
FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
Ravi
Ravi Dudala
Finance Business Partner
Post Office Ltd
1st Floor, 148 Old Street, London, EC1V 9HQ
Postline
STD Phone
External Email
From: Bruce Tann
Sent: 26 March 2012 08:40
To: Ravi Dudala
Cc: Smith Robert
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
Ravi
Is a PO being raised for this?
Thanks
Bruce
Bruce Tann
Project Accountant
Post Office Ltd
Finance
1st Floor, Old Street Wing, 148 Old Street, London. EC1V 9HQ.
From: Smith Robert!
Sent: 23 March 2012
To: Bruce Tann
Cc: Thomas Penny
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
Hi Bruce,
Any news on this one?
Regards
Rob.
From: Smith Robert
Sent: 15 March 2012 16:25
To: ‘Bruce Tann’
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
Hi Bruce,
As per our conversation. Much appreciated if you could investigate.
Regards
Rob.
FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
From: Thomas Penny
Sent: 14 March 2012 15:34
To: Thompson Peter
Cc: Munro Donna; Smith Robert; Jenkins Gareth GI
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
Pete
Am I allowed to do this?
Penny
From: Mark Dinsdale
Sent: 14 March 2012 15:01
To: Jane M Owen
Cc: Thomas Penny
Subject: RE: RM v Bramwell
I've chased finance, and they suggest that we can do this on a cheque or BACS in the same manner as we deal with
witness costs. Therefore we simply need a cost, and Chris can then raise the approrpate paperwork without going
through the normal PO system. Ravi from finance me that this method is the best way.
Mark Dinsdale
Security Programme Manager
Crime Risk, Security Team
Post Office Ltd
Confidential Information: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please contact me by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
From: Jane M Owen
Sent: 14 March 2012 12:24
To: Mark Dinsdale
Cc: ‘Thomas Penny’
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
Mark
Do you know where we are up to with regard to the purchase order for additional litigation support?
FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
Regards
Jane
Jane Owen
Security Manager
Crime Risk
Post Office Ltd
raneviiie een
q EVIn I IRRELEVANT
“Stop the crime
post.office. security:
Confidential Information: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact me by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: Thomas Penny
Sent: 14 March 2012 12:
To: Graham Brander
Cc: Jane M Owen; Post Office Security; Andrew Bolc
Subject: RE: RM v Bramwell
Jane
How are we in regard to the CP for Expert Support? Gareth is unable to commence work until commercials are
approved. Suggest 10 days cover (at least) if meetings with counsel and court appearances are being proposed. He
will also need to review the transaction logs and analyse. The CP should be a call off vehicle which would allow time
not spent on this prosecution to be held for future cases.
Graham
The document sent to us was a scanned in document which does not allow comments to be saved. Gareth ideally
needs a word document with the associated excel spreadsheets. If we receive an electronic copy an intial detailed
comment will take approximately 1 day. However, working with a scanned document could easily double that time.
Kind regards
Penny
Penny Thomas
Security Analyst
Customer Services, Post Office Account
Fujitsu
Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 8SN
E-Mail: ©
FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
Web: _ http://uk.fujitsu.com
From: Graham Brander!__GRO
Sent: 14 March 2012 10:33
To: Thomas Penny
Cc: Jane M Owen; Post Office Security; Andrew Bolc
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
Hi Penny
Please would you look at the e-mail below from our solicitors in the Bishops Hull case and pass onto Gareth. Counsel
would like Gareth to advise on what from the defence expert report faxed to you last week that he is able to rebut if
anything.
I have asked for an electronic copy of the expert report but it is down to the defence as to whether they are prepared to
supply this, as they are only required to serve a hard copy.
The court has stipulated that any response from us to the Defence expert report needs to be served by 5" April. Would
you please ask Gareth if he would be able to meet this timescale?
Thanks.
Regards
Graham Brander
Security Manager
Security Operations
Post Office Ltd
Spread the word...
nes
Confidential Information: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please contact me by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
From: Andrew Bolc
Sent: 13 March 2012 17:00
To: Graham Brander
Subject: FW: RM v Bramwell
Graham,
FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
Please see Emma's email for your information.
Could you see if Fujitsu can work with these rather
vague instructions, otherwise i think the only way
forward is for you to meet with Sue as soon as possible
to help her understand the system and iron out the specifics
that need to be addressed.
It would seem easiest if you could contact Sue's clerk
directly to arrange a convienient date.
Thanks Andrew
From: Emma Haley}
Sent: 13 March 2012 16:24
To: Andrew Bolc
Subject: RM v Bramwell
Dear Andrew
RM v Bramwell
Counsel would, bluntly, like Fujitsu to pour as much cold water as possible on the defence report. If
the expert is saying we cannot disagree with anything at all, then we are potentially in some
difficulty. I have asked Counsel to provide a specific list of questions, but really the essence is: how
much, if anything, can we rebut? And can we explain the accounting system to a jury in a way they
will find easy to understand?
A conference is, of course, going to be essential. I mentioned to counsel Mr Brander's suggestion of
"barrister training" in Cardiff. That might be ideal. Probably easiest for investigator to liaise directly
with counsel's clerk, Grant Bidwell, emai
Regards
Emma Haley
Solicitor
Web: www.stoneking.co.uk
hw Please consider the environment - is it necessary to print this email?
size=2 width="100%" align=center>
FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for Andrew, Bo f you are not Andrew. Bolet
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify Emmataley! y
mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Stone King LLP does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. We do not accept service by email.
Stone King LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number 0C315280. Its registered office is at 13 Queen Square
Bath BA1 2H). It is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The partners are the members of the limited liability partnership. A full list of
all partners is available at all offices.
I ithiihidenininininiEn Ee Rat Roval Mail Group Limited registered in England and
Wales registered number 4138203 registered office 3rd Floor, 100 Victoria Embankment, London, EC4Y 0HQ This
email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this
in error, please contact the sender and then delete this email from your system.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited, from Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, or
from Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, together "Fujitsu".
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Fujitsu Services Limited, registered in England No 96056, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U
3BW.
Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, registered in England No 03808613, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U
3BW.
Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, registered in England No 2548187, registered office Solihull
Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham, B37 7YU.
Henn antennae Royal Mail Group Limited registered in England and
Wales registered number 4138203 registered office 3rd Floor, 100 Victoria Embankment, London, EC4Y 0HQ This
email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this
in error, please contact the sender and then delete this email from your system.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited, from Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, or
from Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, together "Fujitsu".
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Fujitsu Services Limited, registered in England No 96056, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U
3BW.
Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, registered in England No 03808613, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U
3BW.
Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, registered in England No 2548187, registered office Solihull
Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham, B37 7YU.
FUJ00156539
FUJ00156539
“hence cacacaaasasaiasds® Royal Mail Group Limited registered in England and
Wales registered number 4138203 registered office 3rd Floor, 100 Victoria Embankment, London, EC4Y 0HQ This
email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this
in error, please contact the sender and then delete this email from your system.