POL00054544
POL00054544
Message
From: Andy Hayward!
Sent: 30/03/2010
To:
ce:
Subject: Re: REGINA v PETER ANTHONY HOLMES CASE NO: POLTD/0809/0128 14th May 2010 for Confiscation proceedings.
Robert,
I would guess that the Contracts team be his first port of call as they are his primary contact. Any details/info
required thereafter will be passed to us if and as required.
Rgds,
Andy
E Robert Daily
Robert Daily To: Andy Hayw:
cc: Andrew Daley _
30/03/2010 12:58 Harbinson/,
Subject: Re: REGINA v PETER ANTHONY HOLMES
CASE NO: POLTD/0809/0128 14th May 2010 for
=I
Confiscation proceedings..
Andy
Mr Khanna is already repaying the money at £1300 per month from his remuneration.
I expect he will be in contact regarding the decision not to proceed with confiscation on our part. If push comes
to shove and he wishes to go further than myself, can you advise who he should be directed to.
Regards
Rabert
word...
the
Fraud Investigator - Fraud Strand iF aI nie Spgs oO 4004
i: Post Office Ltd Security Team, Security Room, Glasgow Mail Centre, 20 Tumer Road, al ee
Glasgow, G21 1A4
Mobile:
tabert daily’
the crime
© Andy Hayward
Andy Hayward To: Ged Harbinson/
ce: Robert De Andrew
30/03/2010 12:18
Subject: Re: REGINA v PETER ANTHONY HOLMES,
POL-0051023
POL00054544
POL00054544
CASE NO: POLTD/0809/0128 14th May 2010 for
I
Confiscation proceedings.
Ged,
following our discussion thanks for this.
Andrew/Robert,
given that we will now be seeking recovery via the spmr can you ensure you liaise with the Contracts team as
there may be obvious impact/ repercussions.
Cheers,
Andy
&Ged Harbinson
Ged
HarbinsonTo: Jennifer Andrews4
ce:
30/03/2010Dail: x
11:55 Subject: REGINA v PETER ANTHONY HOLMES CASE NO:
POLTD/0809/0128 14th May 2010 for Confiscation proceedings.
Jenny
I have reviewed this case and find that we have dropped the theft charge and successfully prosecuted the 3
counts of false accounting. As this defendant is a sub-postmasters assistant (office manager) and his contract is
with the sub-postmaster and not us I find it difficult to quantify the benefit figure in this case. I believe that we
should withdraw from the confiscation process and that recovery for POLTD should be through the sub-
postmasters contract and for the sub-postmaster through the civil courts for compensation based on any contract
that they believe is enforceable.
Please withdraw from the confiscation process.
Regards
Accredited Financial Investigation Manager — ‘taking the cash out of crime’
I Post OfficeLtd Fraud Strand, PO BOX 1, Croydon, CRO 1VWN
“I Postline! 'GRO
; Mobex: Lo.
JB 63 ale
the crime
@
2
POL-0051023