POL00074092
POL00074092
eS L1-Ub LDie( PRUMEMHRANETDRIVET EU
CLAIM NO. HQ 05 X 02706
IN THE IIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEENS BENCH DIVISION
BETWEEN;
POST OFFICE LIMITED
AND
LEE CASTLETON
I LEE CASTLETON OF... i
WILL SAY, THAT AFTER SEVEN YEARS SERVICE IN THE ROYAL AIR
FORCE AS AIRCRAT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER I LEFT TO PURSUE A
CAREER IN RETAIL AT THE FLAMINGOLAND SUPERMARKET,
MALTON, NORTH YORKSHIRE. A STORE THAT TURNS OVER MORE
THAN £100,000-00 PER WEEK AS MANAGER.AFTER EIGHT YEARS
THERE 1 LEFT TO PURSUE A CAREER IN RETAU.
STOCKBROKING, BEFORE DECIDING TO BUY THE FREEHOLD TO
MARINE DRIVE POST OFFICE BRANC J1,BRIDLINGTON. I APPLIED
AND WAS APPOINTED SUB POSIMASTER ON THE 18" JULY 2003.
BRANCH FORA
1.CHRIST{NE TRAIN HAD BEEN RUNNING THE
TWAS
NUMBER OF YEARS ON BEHALF OF THE FORMER OWNERS.
RECOMMENDED TO MAINTAIN HER EM PLOYMENT BY ALL WHO
TIAD MET HER INCLUDING MRS OGLESBY. SO THIS IS WHAT I DYD.
IT ALLOWED FOR AN EASY TRANSITION FOR MYSELF AND THE
CUSTOMERS.
2, EVERYTHING RAN SMOOTHLY. CHRISTINE AND MYSELF
ADOPTING AN EASY WORKING RELATIONSHIP. WE GOT ON WELL.
3.UNTIL WEDNESDAY 14™ JANUARY 2004 WE BALANCED £1 103.15
SHORT WE COULD SEE NO REASON FOR THIS AY THE TIME. BUT
‘THOUGHT WE MUST HAVE MADE A MISTAKE. WE WENT BACK
THROUGH OUR DECLARATIONS CHECKING FOR THE MISTAKE
BUT NOTHING CAME TO LIGHT.] RANG NBHL (HELPLINE) THE
OPERATOR TOOK BOTH CORISTINE AND MYSELF THROUGH ALL
THE RELEVANT CHECKS. I WAS TOLD THAT WE MUST HAVE MADE
AN ERROR AND TITAT AN ERROR NOTICE WOULD BF. SENT TO OUR
OFFICE IN SLX WEEKS. CHRISTINE COULD NOT BELIEVE THAT AN
614
96% P.29
29-NOV-2086 15:44
29-11-@6 15:27 FROM: MARINE+DRIVE+PO
23-NOV-2086
POL00074092
POL00074092
ERROR HAD OCCURRED. WE DECLDED TO LEAVE IT OVERNIGHT
AND REVISIT THE PAPERWORK THE NEXT MORNING BEFORE
OPENING.
4, WE WERE STILL UNABLE TO FIND THE ERROR SO HAVING
ALREADY REPORTED THE ERROR I MADE GOOD THE LOSS OUT OF
MY OWN POCKET.
5. OVER THE NEXT WEEK WE WERE LOOKING AT THE COMPUTER
MORRF. CLOSELY. LOOKING FOR ANY REASON FOR THELOSS FROM
THE PREVIOUS WEEK.WE NOTICED THAT THE STOCK AND MOP
FIGURE WOULD FLUCTUATE DAILY FROM THE FIGURES THAT WE
ACTUALLY HAD AND THE FIGURES THE COMPUTER EXPECTED TO
SEE. WE HAD A VISIT FROM MRS.OGLESBY ONFRIDAY 16™
JANUARY AT LIAM. WE EXPLAINED THAT WE HAD HAD A LOSS
TIE WEEK BEFORE AND THAT THE STOCK AND MOP FIGURES
WERE NOT FOLLOWING WHAT WE ACTUALLY HAD. MRS.
OGLESBY TOLD US THAT THE STOCK AND MOP FIGURES ARE
ONLY A GUIDE AND THAT THEY WOULD EVEN THEMSELVES OUT
WHEN THE SYSTEM REACHED FINAL BALANCE. CHRISTINE WAS
NOT HAPPY SHE FELT THAT THE STOCK AND MOP FIGURES
SHOULD REPRESENT THE DAILY FIGURES AND CHECKED IN THE
BALANCING WITH HORIZON HANDBOOK WHICIT CONFIRMED HER
THOUGUTS. MRS. OGLESBY TOLD US THAT WE MUST HAVE MADE
A MISTAKE AND AN ERROR NOTICE WOULD COME BACK TO US IN
SLX WEEKS TO GIVE ME BACK THE MONEY. I WAS NOT
CONVINCED.L KNEW FROM PRIOR EXPERIENCE THAT I HAD MADE
‘A MISTAKE IN NOVEMBER WHILST CHRISTINE WAS AWAY ON
HOLIDAY AND I HAD 1O MAKE THAT GOOD. I HAD PAID A
CUSLOMERS CHEQUES IN AS AN AMOUNT ON A GLRO BANK
BUSINESS INPAYMENT. THEN I REMMED OUT THE CHEQUES TO
‘SIE HANDLEING DEPT. WO REALISED THAT I HAD PROCESSED
THEM WRONGLY AND SENT THEM DIRECTLY TO THE CUSTOMER
WHO PROMP'ILY PAID THEM IN TO THEIR ACCOUNT IN EFFECT
RECEIVING THEM TWICE. I THEN RECEIVED AN ERROR NOTICE
WHICH WAS FOR THE WRONG AMOUNT AND WaS TOLD THATI
MUST HAVE BEEN THE VALUE OF THE CHEQUES UP AT BALANCE
ON THE WEDNESDAY NIGHT. BUT OF COURSE HAVING RECEIVED
THEM AS CHEQUES AND PAYING THEM OUT AS CHEQUES HAS NO
BEARING ON IME CASH.BUT AS I POINTED OUT THESE FACTS L
KNEW IT WAS EASIER JUST TO PAY TILE MONEY AND NOT LET IT
HAPPEN AGAIN,
6.WLLEN WE CAME TO BALANCE ON WEEK 43 WEDN ESDAY THE 215°
SANUARY, WE WERE £4230.97 SHORT. WE WERE BESIDE
15:45 96%
615
POL00074092
POL00074092
Pree oe
29-11-06 15:28 FROM:MARINE+DRIVE+PO [
OURSELVES. AGAIN WE WENT THROUGII ALL THE CHECKS AND
THEN STARTED TO PRINT OUT TRANSACTION LOGS. I RANG
HELPLINE I EXPLAINED HOW UNHAPPY I WAS AND THAT OUR
LINE MANAGER HAD TOLD US THAT THE PREVIOUS WEEKS LOSS
WOULD BE JUST AN ERROR WAITING ‘10 BE RETURNED. I
EXPLAINED THAT WE FELT THAT WITH THE BALANCE SNAPSHOTS
NOT MATCHING OUR STOCK AND MOP THAT WE FELT WE HAD A
COMPUTER PROBLEM. I WAS TOLD IT WOULD JUST HAVE BEEN A
MISTAKE AND THAT AN ERROR NOTICE WOULD COME BACK IN
SIX WEEKS. I WAS NOT CONVINCED AND 1 ASKED FOR A SYSTEM
CHECK OR AT LEAST AN ENGINEER TO COME OUT AND LOOK FOR
THE REASON FOR THIS PROBLEM. I EXPLAINED THAT I COULD
NOT AFFORD TO JUST KEEP MAKING GOOD AND WAITING FOR
ERROR NOTICES TO COME BACK. I WAS TOLD THAT BUSINESS
SUPPORT WOULD RING ME THE FOLLOWING DAY. BUT THEY
DIDN’T. I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT THEY WOULD CONTACT MRS.
OGLESBY. BUT AGAIN NO RESPONSE.
7.WE PRINTED MORE AND MORE REPORTS TRYING TO FIND THE
REASON FOR THIS PROBLEM. AGAIN THROUGHOUT THE WEEK WE
MADE REPEATED CALLS TO HELPLINE BUT NOBODY COULD OR
WOULD HELP. I WAS ANNOYED, FRUSTRATED AND BEMUSED.
8. WEEK 44 WEDNESDAY 28™ JANUARY. AGAIN THROUGHOUT THE
WEEK THE STOCK AND MOP FIGURES DID NOT MATCH THE
ACTUAL AMOUNTS WE WERE LOJ.DING. WE BALANCED £2525.12 AS
‘A CASLL SHORTAGE, I WAS FRANTIC. WHAT WOULD WE HAVE TO
DO TO GEY SOMEBODY FROM POST OFFICE TO HELP ? AGAIN
HELPLINE TOLD US THAT THEY WOULD FORWARD OUR PROBLEM
TO BUSINESS SUPPORI AND OUR LINE MANAGER. I TOLD THEM
‘THAT WE HAD SPENT HOURS ON THE PHONE TRYING TO GET
SOMEBODY TO HELP BUT NO KELP WAS FORTHCOMING. I
EXPLAINED THAT I COULD NOT AFFORD TO MAKE THE AMOUNT
GOOD AND WAS TOLD THAT BUSINESS SUPPORT WOULD RING TO
HELP.
9. 1 KNEW THAT NOBODY COULD BE TAKING THE MONEY AS ONLY
CHRISTINE AND MYSELF HAD ACCESS 10 THE KEYS AND THE
AREA BEHIND TLE POST OFFICE COUNTER IS INDIVIDUALLY
ALARMED WITH NO ACCESS TO SHOP PERSONNEL OR CUSTOMERS
BY A LOCKED DOOR. ALL OF WHICH HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY
CHECKED FOR SECURITY COMPLIANCE BY FIRSTLY THE
AUDITORS WHO ON THE 18™ JULY 2003. AUDITORS WHO VISITED
THK OFFICE TO ALLOW THE TRANSFER OF THE OFFICE TO ME
FROM ‘TUE PREVIOUS OWNER ONLY SEVEN MONTOS PREVIOUSLY.
616
29-NOU-2086 15:46 96% P.31
POL00074092
POL00074092
THERE HAD BEEN NO CHANGE OF GUIDELINES NOTIFIED TO ME
DURING THIS PERIOD.
10. WEEK 45 WEDNESDAY THE 4™ FEBUARY 2004, WE STILL HAD
CASH AND STOCK FLUCTUATIONS WHEN COMPALRED TO ‘THE
STOCK AND MOP FIGURES ON THE BALANCE SNAP SHOTS BUT
WHEN WE GOT TO THE FINAL BALANCE WE WERE £26.08 IN CASH
SURPLUS. WE CONTINUED PRINTING OFF REPORTS BECAUSE WE
WERE STILL UNHAPPY WITH THE DIFFERENCES.
11. WEEK 46 WEDNESDAY 11™ FEBUARY 2004. AGAIN THROUGHOUT
THE WEEK THE STOCK AND MOP FIGURES FROM THE BALANCE
SNAPSHOTS DID NOT FOLLOW THE FIGURES WE HAD. WE HADE
1513.09 SHORT IN CASH. IN WEEK 45 WE HAD NO STOCK DELIVERED
AND HAD VERY NEARLY BALANCED BUT IN ALL THE OTHER
WEEKS WE BAD HAD STOCK DELIVERED. WE RANG HELPLINE AND
EXPLAINED OUR FINDINGS. THEY JUST FOBBED US OFF, THEY SAID
THAT I WOULD GET A CALL FROM BUSINESS SUPPORT TO PUT THE
OUTSTANDING AMOUNT INTO SUSPENSE ACCOUNT UNTIL THE
REASON FOR ITS OCCURANCE COULD BE FOUND.
12. L RECEIVED A CALL FROM BUSINESS SUPPORT AND WAS
TALKED THROUGH HOW TO PLACE THE FIGURE INTO SUSPENSE
ACCOUNT.
13. WEEK 47, 18™ FEBUARY 2004, AGAIN THE BALANCE SNAP SHOTS
DO NOT MATCH THE ACTUAL STOCK AND MOP. THE FIGURES
MADE NO SENSE AND AT THE END WE BALANCED.
14, WEEK 48, 25™ FEBUARY 2004 AGAIN THE STOCK AND MOP
FIGURES BORE NO RESEMBLANCE TO THE ACTUAL STOCK AND
MOP THROUGHOUT THE WEEK. WE BALANCED £ 3509.18 AS A CASH
SHORTAGE STILL NO HELP STILL NO ANSWERS. CHRISTINE ANDT
DISSCUSSED WHAT WE MUST DO NOW TO GET SOMEBODY ELSE
INVOLVED AT THE POST OF FICE. WE DECIDED TO ASK MRS.
OGLESBY TO ARRANGE AN AUDIT WE FELT AT LEAST THEN
SOMEBODY ELSE WOULD PUT THE WHOLE SORRY SAGA TO AN
END. WE RECEIVED A CALL FROM HORIZON HELPLINE
REF.E0402251077. WE EXPLAINED THE PROBLEMS AND THAT WE
¥ELY 'YHE MISS BALANCES MUST HAVE BEEN COMPUTER
GENERATED.
15. WEEK 49, {PUT THE PREVIOUS WEEKS LOSS INTO SUSPENSE
ACCOUNT AGAIN UNDER THE GULDANCE OF ONE OF THE BUSINESS
SUPPORT HELPLINE SIAFK WHO HAD RETURNED MY CALL TO THE
HELPLINE FROM THE 25™ FEBUARY. AGAIN THE SYSTEM FIGURES
617
PO-NNU-2AAR «15:47 96% P.32
POL00074092
POL00074092
29-11-86 15:38 FROM:MARINE+DRIVE+PO ;
FROM THE BALANCE SNAPSHOTS THROUGHOUT THE WEEK WERE
NOT COMPATERBLE WITH OURS OR THE TRANSACTIONAL,
WORKED FIGURES DISPLAYED ON THE BALANCE SNAPSHOTS.WE
AGAIN BALANCED £3512.26 AS A SHORTAGE IN CASI. AGAIN WE
MADE THE CALLS TO HELPLINE AND AGAIN NO HELP WAS
FORTHCOMING.
16. WEEK 50, 10™ MARCI 2004. WE HAD REALISED THAT TUE
SHORTAGE AND SURPLUS FIGURES DID NOT MATCH THE WAY THE
BALANCING WITH HORIZON HANDBOOK DEPICTED THAT THEY
SHOULD LOOK. I SHOWED THIS IO MRS. OGLESBY AT HER
MONTHLY MEETING ON FRIDAY 5™ MARCH. SHE WAS NOT
INTERESTED SHE TOLD US THAT THE BOOK WAS WRONG AND
THAT THE £3512.26 WAS A FURTHER LOSS. WE WERE BEYOND
OURSELVES. I ASKED HER TO ORGANISE AN AUDIT AND THAT
KVEN IF SHE WAS HAPPY WITH THE PROBLEMS WE HAD I WAS
NOT AND I NERDED SOMEBODY TO INVESTIGATE THE MATTER.
17. BY THE END OF THIS WEEK WE WERE A FURTHER £7140.85
SHORT ACCORDING TO THE SYSTEM IN CASH.DOUBLE THE
PREVIOUS WEEK. AGAIN NO HELP FROM ANYBODY HORIZON,
HELPLINE AND MRS. OGLESBY JUST WERE NOT INTERESTED.
18, WEEK 51, 17™ MARCL 2004, A FURTHER LOSS OF £557.45. AGAIN
SHOWING AS A CASH LOSS IT JUST COULD NOT BE RIGHT. OVER
THE PREVIOUS WEEKS WE HAD NUMEROUS PROBLEMS WITL THE
COMPUTER. FROM FLASHING SCREENS TO LOST TRANSACTIONS
BUT AS I WAS PROCESSING A CHEQUE IN PAYMENT FOR A
CUSTOMER MRS. DOROTHY CONSTABLE THE SCREEN CLEARED
AND FROZE I CHECKED THE TRANSACTION LOG AND THE
‘TRANSACTION DID NOT APPEAR. I HAD NOT COMPLETELY FLLLED
OUT THE FORM AND HAD NOT STAMPED IT. 1 EXPLAINED TO THE
CUSTOMER AND SHE REALISED THAT SHE HAD NOT BROUGHT
HER LD. DETAILS WIL'H HER SO SHE SALD SHE WOULD GO HOME
AND FINISIT THE FORM AND PUT IT IN THE POST BOX OUTSIDE.
WHICH SHE DLD. It WAS AN APPLICATION FOR A NEW N.S. ANDL
ACCOUNT LO REPLACE THE OLD ORDINARY ACCOUNT. AFIERA
KEW DAYS SLLE CAME BACK INTO ME HOLDING THE SAME
CHEQUE WITH A LETIER EXPLAINING 7 HAT N.S. AND I, WERE
UNABLE TO PROCESS THE APPLICATION ANY FURTHER BECAUSE
SHE HAD FORGOTTEN TO GIVE THEM DETAILS OF ANOTHER
ACCOUNT. L'LOLD HER THAY 1 WOULD PAY THE CHEQUE INTO
HERN.S. AND I. INVESTMENT ACCOUNT AND THEN AT A LATER
DATE WE COULD ALWAYS APPLY 1}0 OPEN THE NEW ACCOUNT.
SLE AGREED AND 1 PROCESSED THE TRANSACTION.
96%
29-NOU-2085 15:48
Prac: oo
618
P.33
POL00074092
POL00074092
29-11-86 15:31 FROM: MARINE+DRIVE+PO I GRO PHiat t 34
19, FINALLY THE AUDITORS ARRIVED AT 08.00 ON TILE 23° MARCH
2004. 1 WAS EXTREMELY RELIEVED. I FELT THAT FINALLY
SOMEBODY ELSE WOULD BE INVOLVED. I EXPLAINED THE
SITUATION AND HOW OVER THE WEEKS I FELT WE HAD
REPEATEDLY BEEN FAILED. MISS HOLLINGSWORTH TOLD ME
THAT WE HAD BEEN AND THAT THE LINE MANAGER SHOULD NOT
HAVE ALLOWED THIS TO DAVE LASTED THREE WEEKS LET
ALONE THREE MONTHS. SHE SAID THAT THE LOSSES WERE
UNAUTHORISED AND ITHAT MY LINE MANAGER WHILST WAS
FULLY AWARE OF THE PROBLEM SHOULD HAVE SOUGHT A
REMEDY. MRS OGLESBY I WAS TOLD WOULD ARRIVE SOON AND
THEN THEY WOULD DISCUSS HOW TO MOVE FORWARD.
MRS OGLESBY ARRIVED AND WENT STRAIGHT INTO THE POST
OFFICE COUNTER TO SPEAK TO MISS HOLLINGSWORTH. I WAS
TOLD TO GO INTO THE REAR STORE ROOM. I HAD NOT SIGNED
‘THE STOCK HANDOVER FORM AND THE STOCK WAS STILL OUT ON
THE DESK. I WAS ASSURED THAT ‘THAT WAS ALRIGHT AND LEFT.
MRS. OGLESBY CAME OUT TO TALK TO BOTH MYSELF AND
CHRISTINE SHE LOLD ME THAT 1 HAD TWO OPTIONS, FIRSTLY T
COULD CLOSE THE BRANCH PENDING AN INVESTIGATION OR SHE
SALD ‘HAT SHE KNEW A POST MISTRESS VERY WELL FROM BULL
WHO WOULD BE WILLING TO COME AND RUN THE BRANCH ON A
‘TEMPORARY BASIS AND ONCE THE COMPUTER WAS PROVEN TO
BE KAULT'Y,THEN WE COULD REVERT BACK TO OURSELVES
RUNNING TUE OFFICE. THIS I AGREED WITH. MRS SLMPSON
ARRIVED AT ABOUT 16.00 ‘THAT DAY AND OFFICIALLY TOOK OVER
THE OFFICE. WHEN MRS. OGLESBY INTRODUCED MRS. SIMPSON
SHE INSRODUCED HER AS A VERY EXPERIENCED SUB POST
MISTRESS WHO HAD ON THE INTRODUCTION OF HORIZON BEEN
GIVEN EXTRA TRAINING TO HELP OTHER POSTMASTERS HAVING
PROBLEMS JN HER AREA. BUT ALSO SHE TOLD US THAT THEY
WERE VERY GOUD FRIENDS AND SHE WOULD LOOK AFTER THE
OFFICE AND CUSTOMERS AS THOUGH THEY WERE HER OWN.THIS
OF COURSE WAS NOT THE CASE. RUTH REPORTED VIA MOBILE
PHONE DIRECTLY TO CATH NOT tHE HELPLINE. ON WEDNESDAY
24™ MARCH RUTH WAS HAVING A PROBLEM BALANCING AND
PHONED CATH REPEATEDLY. BOTH DENLED THIS. SHE WAS
CONSTANTLY ADDING ON A CALCULATOR AND WRITING AND
CROSSING OUT FIGURES ON A FINAL BALANCE. THEN TO FIND SHE
CLAIMED TO ONLY HAVE MISSED BALANCE BY £2.12 IS
COMPLETELY FALSE. THERE ARE TWO LOTTERY ERRORS
OUTSTANDING FROM RUTH SIMPSONS TEMPORARY TENURE. BY
THE BALANCE ON 157 APRIL RUTH SIMPSON WAS UNABLE TO
TRANSACT BUSINESS ON THE COMPUTER ALL MORNING. AT FIRST
619
23-NOV-2086 15:49 96% P.34
POL00074092
POL00074092
29-11-5152 52 FRUMIMARINETDRLVETTU I
SHE CLAIMED THIS WAS BECAUSE SHE HAD NOT COMPLETED A
STAMP PRICE INCREASE. TUEN SHE CLAIMED Tf WAS BECAUSE
LT CRCONTTN CITI CS Ce
PROCESSING LINE WHICH IS AGAIN IS KFALSE.I BELIEVE THE
COMPUTER WAS HAVING A SOFTWARE REWRITE. AFTER FAILING
TO BALANCE ON ‘THE 24™ MARCH AND THE 157 APRIL.
20. MRS OGLESBY REPORTED TO ME THAT THE SYSTEM WAS
HAVING NO SUCH PROBLEMS.
21. ON THE 10™ MAY MRS OGLESBY ARRIVED AND TOOK AWAY
ALL RELEVANT PAPERWORK FOR MY SUSPENSION HEARING ON 13
MAY 2004, SHE TOOK WITH HER CASH ACCOUNTS,BALANCEK
SNAPHOTS ,FLNAL BALANCE READINGS, TRANSACTION LOGS,CASH.
DECLARATIONS. IN HER VIEW TO GET A PICTURE OVER THE
WEEKEND AS TO WHAT HAD OCCURRED OVER THE ELEVEN
WEEKS OF PROBLEMS AT MARINE DRIVE BRANCH. AGAIN I ASKED
FOR AND INVESTIGATION . I WAS TOLD IT WAS HER DECISION NOT
MINE.
22. 13 MAY 2004 THE SUSPENSION HEARING WAS ATTENDED BY
MRS OGLESBY, MRS LESLEY JOYCE, MRS CHRISTINE TRAIN AND
MYSELF. I ASKED TO TAPE THE INTERVIEW. MRS OGLESBY TOLD
ME L COULD NOT.IT WAS NOT ALLOWED.
23. AFTER A FEW DAYS MY CONTRACT WAS TERMINATED BY
LETIER. THE NOTES FROM THE MEETING BORE NO
RESEMBLENCE 10 THE MEETING AND I DLD NOT SIGN THEM TO
SAY THEY DO.
24, 1 FORMALLY ASKED FOR AND APPEAL AGAINST MRS OGLESBYS
DECISION WHICH WAS GRANTED. THE APPEAL WAS LED BY POST
OFFICE EMPLOYEE, MR JOHN JONES WHO WAS ACCOMPANIED BY
MR MELLOW-FACER’S P.A. TO TAKE NOTES.NEITHER
INDEPENDENT. AGAIN ‘THE NOTES BORE NO RESEMBLANCE TO
‘THE MEETING AND YET MORE QUESTIONS REMAINED
UNANSWERED.
25.MR JONES UPHELD MY TERMINATION.
26.0VER THE COMING MONTHS I WAS CONTACTED BY DEBT
RECOVERY AT CHESTERFIELD. 1 WAS ASKED TO MAKE GOOD THE
LOSSES AT MARINE DRIVE BRANCH. I ANSWERED IN THE SAME
WAY I HAD ANSWERED OVER THE PAST SLX MONTHS. I REQUIRED
VARIOUS DOCUMENTS RETURNING AND THE SYSTEMS AUDIT
- 620
23-NOU-2885 «15:49
POL00074092
POL00074092
rir: 20
TRAIL, THIS WOULD THEN ALLOW ME TO DEMONSTRATE THE
PROBLEMS WITH HORIZON SYSTEM AND SHOW HOW THESE
SHORTAGES WERE DUE TO THE SYSTEM AND NOT MYSELF OR
CHRISTINE TRAIN.
27. THROUGH MY SOLICITOR IN FEBRUARY 2005 I ASKED FOR PRE-
ACTION DISCLOSURE. THE POST OFFICE RE-ACTED BY STARTING
PROCEEDINGS AND SENDING A VERY SMALL AMOUNT OF THE
REQUIRED DOCUMENTS BACK CLAIMING OTHER DOCUMENTS DID
NOT EXIST. HAVING PRINTED OUT VARIOUS AND NUMEROUS
REPORTS PERSONNALLY I KNEW THAT THIS WAS UNTRUE.
28. 1 NOW HAVE ENOUGH DOCUMENTS TO PROVE THE COMPUTERS
FAULTS AND FRAILITES. 1 CAN DEMONSTRATE IN GREAT DETAIL
THE PROBLEMS THAT AROSE THROUGH THE SYSTEMS FAULTS.
L Chan 4 UAT can BRU EVE THE CONTENTS
OF THe STATEMENT ARE TRUE. 29fufoe
621
29-NOV-28865 15:58