BEIS0000980 - Email from Tom Cooper to Edward Emerson, James Gourlay and Siv Rajeswaran re: FW: OFFICIAL SENSITIVE PERSONAL: Nick Read, Post Office

Evidence on official site

BEIS0000980
BEIS0000980

From: Cooper, Tom - UKGI
Sent: Thur 26/08/2021 12:38:19 PM (UTC)
To: Emerson, Edward - UKG! Gourlay, James -

Rajeswaran, Siv -

Subject: Fw: OFFICIAL SENSITIVE PERSONAL: Nick Read, Post Office

Tom Cooper I Director

UK Government Investments

From: Cooper, Tom - UKGI

Sent: 17 August 2021 10:30

To: Scully, Minister (Private Office) ! Munby, Sarah (BEIS)
reswell, Carl (Professional Business Services, Retail & Post

Cc: Donald, Charles - UKG

Subject: OFFICIAL SENSITIVE PERSONAL: Nick Read, Post Office

I met Nick this morning and had a discussion about a variety of things including his situation ahead of
Tim Parker’s meeting with Minister Scully on 1 September.

He made it pretty clear that he is going to take a decision about whether to stay or leave over the
next 2-3 months. He feels that the task he has faced over the 2 years since he joined has been far
harder than advertised and he has had to work flat out to hold the business together. He doesn’t feel
that his efforts have been recognised or, just as importantly, rewarded. Although he didn’t say it this
morning,t I has received (even
though he wasn’t responsible’

Going forward, the SR settlement is part of his decision-making in terms of his ability to execute the
business plan and what needs to be done over the next few years. He wants to be able to focus on
the future rather than the errors of the past. The last ‘element i is that he wants some immediate
recognition for what he has had to deal with!

He understands that we have been working to secure some additional LTIP for him but he is saying
this isn’t enough. He mentioned that he has only received £32k of variable pay since joining POL and
BEIS0000980
BEIS0000980

communication has been negligible as he has received nothing from the company about what he will
earn going forward. Finally, at the end of last year, Tim Parker promised to try to get him £100k in
additional pay this year (which we have consistently told Tim will be extremely difficult to secure).

To conclude, my judgement on this is the flight risk is real. As we know, there are no credible
fallbacks in the management team. Although, rationally, £100k should not be not enough to make a
difference to Nick’s decision to stay or leave, this seems to have become something of a point of
principle for him.

In addition to the upcoming meeting on 1 September, I’ve also encouraged Carl to secure a meeting
between SoS and Nick as soon as possible.

Tom

Tom Cooper I Director
UK Government Investments

1 Victoria S'

t, London, SW1H OET
“TE

www.ukgi. a uk
Follow on