FUJ00065150 - Error Log PC0051361

Evidence on official site

FUJ00065150
FUJ00065150

Peak Incident Management System

[Call Reference PC0051361 [Call Logger [ Customer Call_-- EDSC
Release [Targeted At-- CSR-CI3_2R [Top Ref. E-0007281804

(Call Type Live Incidents Priority B -- Business restricted
‘Contact, EDSC [Call Status [Closed -- Administrative Response
(Target Date [02/08/2000 [Effort (Man Days) lo

Summary [070937 Receipts and Payments mismatch

Progress Narrative

Date :28-Jul-2000 15:35:00 User: _Customer Cal1_

CALL Pc0051361:Priority B:CallType L - Target 02/08/00 16:35:16

28/07/00 16:31 office reports adifference in its reciept & payment totals
for cap18 . please send this call to john moran

iF} Call details

Diagnostician name:

customer opened date 28/07/2000 16:31:39

CALL Pc0051361 opened

Date :28-Jul-2000 15:42:00 User:Barbara Longley
Ithe call summary has been changed from:
office reports adifference in its reciept & paymen
Ihe call summary is now:
(path039) -Receipts and Payments mismatch
Target Release updated to CSR-CI3_2R

product General/Other/Misc Reconciliation added

Date :28-Jul-2000 15:51:00 User:Barbara Longley

Routing call to MSU FAO John Moran.

the Call record has been transferred to the Team: MSU-Indt Mgt
Hours spent since call received: 0 hours

Date :31-Jul-2000 09:14:00 User:Angela Shaw

the Call record has been assigned to the Team Member: John Moran
Defect cause updated to 99:General - Unknown

Hours spent since call received: 0 hours

Date :31-Jul-2000 10:15:00 User:John Moran
lthe call summary has been changed from:-
(path039) -Receipts and Payments misma’
the call summary is now:
070937 Receipts and Payments mismatch

Date :31-Jul-2000 12:52:00 User:John Moran
lr} Response

IT know what caused this problem. It was because reference data was not sent
to the outlests concerning PsA products--The cash settlement was mapped to
the CA, but the corresponding transaction was not. If these transactions

vere recorded by in the Counter Transaction Exceptions report I could supply
POCL TP with this information myself, but they have not been recorded.

can you supply the offending non mapped transactions to this PinICL in
tessage store extact so I can reconcile with Chesterfield?

[END OF REFERENCE 20660088

Responded to call type L as Category 40 -Incident Under Investigation

Ihe response has been flagged to the gate:

y team for validation
Ihe Call record has been transferred to the Team: EDSC

Hours spent since call received: 0 hours

pate :31-Jul-2000 13:58:00 User:Jim Anscomb
the Call record has been assigned to the Team Member: Michael Burton
Hours spent since call received: 0 hours

Date :31-Jul-2000 15:58:00 User:Deleted User (Michael BurtonSep/00)
New evidence added - The transactions

bate :31-Jul-2000 15:59:00 User:Deleted User (Michael BurtonSep/00)
the call record has been transferred to the Team: MSU-Indt Mgt
Hours spent since call received: 0 hours

pate :01-Aug-2000 09:53:00 Use
lr} Response

the Call record has been transferred to the Team: MSU-Indt Mgt

[END OF REFERENCE 20684666]

Responded to call type L as Category 40 -Incident Under Investigation
the response was delivered to:

arbara Longle

FUJ00065150
FUJ00065150

Date :01-Aug-2000 12:55:00 Use
?} Response

it am looking for what caused the difference in receipts and payments of
:20649.19, The text file attached only adds up to £20,550.35. Is there
Iancther transaction for £98.84 to make up this difference? Please check this
Jaifference out.

(END OF REFERENCE 20695312]

Responded to call type L as Category 40 -Incident Under Investigation

Ivhe response has been flagged to the gateway team for validation

IThe Call record has been transferred to the Team: EDSC

Hours spent since call received: .1 hours

Date:01-Aug-2000 13:23:00 User:Barbara Longley

iF} Response :

the Call record has been transferred to the Team: EDSC

[END OF REFERENCE 20696924]

Responded to call type L as Category 40 -Incident Under Investigation
the response was delivered to: PowerHelp

pate :01-Aug-2000 13:39:00 vse
iF} Response +

lsohn Moran in MSU has asked for this call to be returned to him.

(END OF REFERENCE 20698005)

JResponded to call type L as Category 40 -Incident Under Investigation
Ithe response was delivered to: PowerHelp

rhe call record has been transferred to the Team: MSU-Indt Mgt

Hours spent since call received: 0 hours

jarbara Longley

bate :01-Aug-2000 13:57:00 User:John Moras
i} Response :

this difference in receipt and Payment totals was caused by the fact that
non-core reference data was not delivered to this office in time.

the reference data was for OBCS products 177 to 185.

s this reference data included primary mappings for these products these
products could not be mapped to the cash account at stock unit rollover.

Ithis is what caused the difference in the receipt and payment totals.

this incident is related to 9 others all caused by this same problem. All
the offices effected were migrated to Horizon on 20/7/00.

11 the offending transactions took place 21/7/00-- when there was not
reference data at the outlets.

the correct reference data was delivered for business on 22/7/00.

Ir have provided with the final BIM report an excel spread sheet (with the
same file name as the BIM report) listing the offending transactions which
lwere not mapped to the cash account.

[END OF REFERENCE 20699061]

Responded to call type L as Category 68 -Administrative Response

Hours spent since call received: .3 hours

the Call record has been transferred to the Team: EDSC

the response has been routed to the gateway team for validation

Date:01-Aug-2000 14:03:00 User:Barbara Longley
the Call record has been assigned to the Team Member: Michael Burton
Hours spent since call received: 0 hours

Date :07-Aug-2000 10:28:00 User:Deleted User (Michael BurtonSep/00)
IF} Response +

Jclosing

(END OF REFERENCE 20856465)

Responded to call type L as Category 68 ~Administrative Response
Hours spent since call received: 1 hours

JcALL PC0051361 closed: Category 68, Type L

[fhe response was delivered to: PowerHelp

bate :07-Aug-2000 10:33:00 User:_Customer Call_
bate and time complete: 07/08/2000 11:39:12
service Complete (Confirmation) Received

FUJ00065150

FUJ00065150
Root Cause IGeneral - Unknown
Logger ‘Customer Call_ -- EDSC
Subject Product [General/Other/Mise -- Reconciliation (version unspecified)
Assignee Deleted User -- EDSC
Last Progress J07-Aug-2000 10:33 -- Customer Call_