FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
(oe)
FUJITSU
RMGA
Internal Programme Board
Date 11 Feb 2010
For Fujitsu Eyes Only pyright 2009 Fujitsu Services Limited
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
foe)
FUJITSU
HNGX R1 Project Progress Report
Geoff Butts
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 1
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
HNGX R1 Red Major issue impacting timescales, cost orrisk <9
Amber — Major issue but with actions agreed to resolve FUJITSU
RAG Summ ary Green _ No issues
Last Current Description G2G plan G2G Target
RAG Status I Status Date
[Approved Budget
3 Line Support for Branch connectivity E2E - ae Se .
Resourcing solution. Number of key areas of work to complete} pelays in obtaining additional technical resource I 59 Feb 10
~ Vodafone, PHUs in live, VSAT, BR issues. identified to start knowledge transition.
Start of MVP moved back to 11/02/10 due to BTS
issues. Dependency on fixing these for A ae .
Ss migrations starting 17/02/10. Overall impact on Early implementation of BTS fix into live by
chedule schedule — end rollout now forecast for 20/05/10. 12/02/10 to give assurance for MVP. 0108 15 Feb 10
Completion of Vol Test Cycle 2 on critical path for Maintenance Release plan under daily review.
start of High Volume Pilot.
Requirements
Architecture
Continued focus on fixing Peaks raised for BR i i iti
(Apps Development Rollout + LST Counter Testing. Revised plan for Daily reviews of critical Peaks/fixes to ensure 22 Feb 10
Maintenance Release 0108 issued to POL. delivered/tested for BR Rollout, Counter Pilot
Vol Test Cycle 1 started late (01/02/10).
Completion scheduled for 20/02/10. Peak fixes forIRe-planning of LST underway to support urgent
Test MVP tracked and reported daily. Branch Router _I fixes required to allow branch router volume roll I22 Feb 10
PHU v1.75 sign-off completed 05/02/10. Testing Iout and HNG-X Pilot
of live fixes impacting on 0108 testing.
25% Branch Routers installed. Orange WWAN fl - fl
Config to be downloaded to first 1,300 Branch Inder ten mann tows ing rate (proposal
Migration Routers. Vodafone WWAN + VSAT to be tested. ad dre ‘sing BR i tall ?. i to Support team 122 Feb 10
Router rollout rate increasing to make up slow acoressing aces eyo increase SUCCESS
start. Revised HVP schedule agreed with POL. rate. Revised, shortened HVP to prove beat rate.
Vodafone WWAN to be setup in live. VSAT
solution to be completed. Support resources
Infrastructure working on live issues and BR installations. Prioritise support resource. 22 Feb 10
Decommissioning scope under review —
Datacentre exit from Wigan/Bootle by 31/07/10.
Service Transition Support fixes for Branch router required in live. Review processes & resources in Deployment 22 Feb 10
Tracking of live pilot issues by Deployment/CS. Team.
Contract
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
HNGX R1 Exec Summary FUJITSU
Key Challenges:
BTS issue from Low Volume Pilot has to be fixed to enable start of MVP.
Slip to start of MVP results in slip to R1 rollout (20/05/10). Options to mitigate investigated — Account
decision on how to proceed.
Delay in increasing 3rd line support team for Branch Connectivity solution
Current VOL plan to mitigate delay of VOL rig build requires VOL Test Team to work all weekends
through February and March
Overall Plan faces a number of risks
* Completion of Vol Test Cycle 1 (High Volume Pilot)
* Completion of Vol Test Cycle 2 (Rollout)
* Completion of MVP without major issues
* Testing of 0108 Maintenance Release
* Completion of HVP without major issues
Key Progress:
Extended Small Volume pilot - 28 live branches on HNG-X, 22 trading, 6 Model Office
Next 10 branches for start of MVP scheduled to migrate 11/02/10
2,383 Branch Routers installed, 25% of estate
Branch Router install success rate now consistently above 85%
Branch router rollout approaching full beat rate (1,130 this week, 1,200 next week)
Volume Testing Cycle 1 started
First Maintenance Release (0108) — Datacentre fixes scheduled into LST 14/02/10
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 3
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
HNGX R1 Key Risks & Issues FUJITSU
“im Key Risks —
Vol Testing may slip — potentially
slipping HVP and Rollout
Current maintenance release
content will increase/change
through counter pilot
Significant live issues (Horizon or
HNGX) may result in the rollout
being delayed
Beat rate during full rollout cannot
be sustained, leading to delays
Slip to programme puts exit from
Wigan/Bootle Datacentres by
31/07/10 at risk
POLFS migration weekend occurs
immediately after start of HVP —
potential resource contention
@ Key Issues
=m Delays to MVP impacting on
schedule
= Dev/test of live issues impacting on
other test activities — e.g. 0108
= 3% line support for Branch
Connectivity inadequate and work
increasing (Vodafone WWAN
setup, live issues, Branch router
issues).
m Revised plan for first maintenance
release gives implementation date
during stabilisation period before
full rollout.
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 4
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
HNGX R1 Key Milestones FUJITSU
Milestone Team ___IPlannedIForecast [Comment
Weekend A Mig 28/02/10} 05/03/10IDate confirmed - 05/03/10 following request from POL to move back 1
week so avoid month end processing period.
Counter Roll Out Commence Mig 09/11/09} 15/03/10ISubject to satisfactory completion of MVP, HVP and Vol Test Cycle
1/Cycle 2
Branch Router Roll Out Complete Mig 15/11/09] 13/04/10)/Branch router install success rate running >85%. Increased rollout rate
is making up for slow start. VSAT solution is delayed due to resource
contention in 3rd line support team
Counter Roll Out Complete Mig 30/04/10}20/05/10 IAssumes rollout start 15/03/10. Excludes 4% “Tail”
TBC
Milestones Closed since last report
Counter Pilot Commence Mig 04/01/10] 13/01/10IDependent on exit criteria from Model Office being met. By agreement
with POL. slipped 1 week due to service concerns and LST Counter
testing of Spare and new migration packages. 1 day slip made on
recommendation of POL (to 11/01). due to delays caused by adverse
weather. 1 day slip following RAB review 10/01. First 2 branches
started migration process today. Pre-migration checks successful.
Monitoring in place.
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
HNGX R1 Finance Summary FUJITSU
Cumulative
Agreed CAC I Agreed CAC Spend to Date} Remaining
(Q1Budget) (FebFC) Variance (Jan-10) Spend
£m £m £m £m £m
Development (incl PM &
PMO) 48.7 48.7 0.0 48.7 0.0
Test 17.0 17.0 0.0 16.9 0.1
Rigs & Networks 45 4.5 0.0 4.4 0.0
DC Migration & Rollout 3.6 3.6 (0.0) 2.8 0.8
Contingency 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5
Sub-Total 74.3 74.3 0.0 72.7 1.5
Others (BOM, Expenses,
Depreciation) 18.0 18.0 0 18.1 0.0
TOTAL 92.3 92.3 0.0 90.8 1.5
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 6
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
Fe)
FUJITSU
HNGX R1 Resource profile
@ Development
@ Infrastructure
Mgration
Oo PVO
@ Programme
Test
Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10
Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10
@ Development 10 6 0 te) 0 0 0
@ Infrastructure 3 3 3 i) 0 0 0
O Mgration 14 17 15 12 2 1 1
a PMO 3 3 3 3 0 0 0
@ Programme 2 1 () t) 0 0
Test 21 10 8 0 0 0
Period
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
~— FUJITSU
£k
£9,000 +
£8,000
£7,000
£6,000
£5,000
£4,000
£3,000
£2,000 +-
£1,000
£0
HNGX Risk Profile
Rollout
£0
£480
£118
£173
£173
£173
£298
£298
£245
£210
£263
£263
£263
£263
@ Plot
£2,265
£181
£171
£144
£93
£81
£420
£420
£280
£193
£210
£210
@ Test & Mgration
£6,120
£2,269
£2,042
£2,096
£2,140
£1,822
£857
£457
£283
£114
£78
Month
Rollout
@ Plot
O Test & Mgration
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
HNGX R11 Help Needed FUJITSU
m Securing additional resource (and agreement for funding) for 3" line support
team
For Fujitsu Eyes Only )
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
foe)
FUJITSU
POLFS Migration Project Progress Report
Vince Cochrane
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 10
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLES Red Major issue impacting timescales, cost or risk <9
RA Amber — Major issue but with actions agreed to resolve FUJITSU
G Su mmary Green No issues
Last Current Description G2G plan G2G Target Date
RAG Stat
Status ae
Migration date agreed as 8" March 2010 — all work Prepare detailed task plans for pre-live
Approved Budget now planned. Some capital cost spend for EMC proving / synthetic DR and assess cost I 5" February
storage work circa £20k impacts --complete
Pre-live proving now complete. Synthetic
I - 1 _, IDR test & migration dry run scheduled in
Resource impacts for pre-live proving and ‘synthetic’ Feb. Resources known, including Colin
Resourcing DR agreed Colin Mills dedicated until migration Mills for schedules & Pete Jobson time 5" February
complete needed to complete outstanding design.
i th
‘Schedule Now progressing as per plan of record. Revised target dates (8" March) agreed February
Requirements All now agreed. All agreed. 5" February
Architecture
Apps Development
Test OAT testing behind schedule but still on target to All agreed with the Customer. Late Feb
complete before planned end date.
Migration
Infrastructure Confirm the archive design In progress Mid Feb
Service Transition
Contract
CRs
11
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLFS Exec Summary FUJITSU
m Key Challenges:
» Resource contention on both sides due to R1, POL-FS & SAP activities
= OAT testing of shared infrastructure components in live environment
m™ Key Progress:
= OAT progressing, agreement to proceed with OCPs for TWS schedules
» PLP1 successful completed
» Updated L4 plan produced, under final review along with joint risk
register
m@ Schedule:
» POL has requested cutover start date moved back 1 week to 05/03/10 to
avoid month end processing on 28/02/10.
» Rehearsal scheduled for W/E 19" — 21% February; on track
= DR proving scheduled for W/E 27" — 28" February; on track
» Migration scheduled for W/E 5" — 7" March; on track.
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 12
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
I Key Risks
POLFS migration testing impacts
live operations (POLMI & HNGX).
Action — Careful monitoring of live
operations
Programme priorities divert shared
resources from POLFS migration
work. Action — regular review with
programme management
Additional work for pre-live proving
to be confirmed / synthetic DR OK.
Action — agree way forward and
put plans in place.
POLFS migration delays have a
negative impact on POLSAP.
Action — regular reviews with
POLSAP project / programme
management
For Fujitsu Eyes Only
-POLFS Key Risks & Issues Summary - Fujitsu
ol Key Issues
m Archive migration approach not
fully understood and documented.
Action — LLD to be produced for
circulation with POL; CP in
progress for proposed solution
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLFS Key Milest ir
ey Milestones FUJITSU
Milestone Description Team/ Planned Forecast Comment RAG
Project Date Date Status
POLFS Regression Test I POLFS 2"4 Oct 2"4 Oct
to prove Linux
environment signed off
Production systems POLFS 9" Nov 5% Jan
completed
OAT completes POLFS 24" Feb 24" Feb
Migration rehearsal POL FS 24" Feb 24" Feb
Synthetic DR POLFS 1st Mar 1st Mar
POLFS Production Live I POLFS 8" Mar 8 Mar
POLFS Migration
Complete (including the I po_Fs 6 Apr 6" Apr
archive service)
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 14
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLFS Help Needed FUJITSU
m None Required this period.
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 15
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
foe)
FUJITSU
HNGX R2 Project Progress Report
David Court
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 16
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
R2 RAG Summa
Red Major issue impacting timescales, cost or risk Fe)
Amber — Major issue but with actions agreed to resolve FUJITSU
Green Noissues’ I
Last. I current Description G2G plan G2G Target Date
RAG Status
Status
Forecasts for commercial cover for Mar being
Approved Budget prepared in case Core/Standing not signed.
Resourcin 2 of 4 test resources reverted to R1 but not expected
9 to impact start of SV&I
For business benefit reasons, POL want some items . 7 aa tn
Schedule earlier than R2 timescales — in June 2010 Meeting on 19/02 to discuss feasibility 19" Feb 2010
. CRs expected for :- Stock Adj, POCa, AEI, Only progress when baseline CT’s.
Requirements Moneygram & Streamline approved, then impact re costs / time End Feb 2010
Architecture
Apps Development
Test
Migration nla nla
Limited R2 work but R1 activities consuming
Infrastructure palolinaning
Service Transition
*, Escalation to David Smith if o/s approvals} , ..,
Contract Late POL approval for CT Ss. ; ; not given this week. 12" Feb 2010
CCN & Wrapper CT will have e commercial wording. Issue CT & CCN End Feb 2010
Slow to progress.
ICRs CRs outside baseline — Margins File, Travel Submit CT’s and impacts to cost / time End Feb 2010
Insurance, Remote FTMS, PING AIS, +2
ave
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
R2 Exec Summary FUJITSU
m Key Challenges:
= Stable requirements; Baselined approved contents of Release
m Early R2 Release of items
m Use Cases
= Incorporating R1 peaks
= Level of CR’s — extra items to baseline; changing req’s of those in
baseline
= Impact of R1 on resourcing
m= ADSL Checker implementation by 28" Feb (BT turn off service on 10"
March)!
™ Key Progress:
= Development work has continued on Drops 1, 2&3
= CIT Testing of Drop 1 started on 10" Feb
= Testing analysis has started; SV&l starting 18 March
= CTs issued to POL — POCa & Camelot Cheques (both baseline)
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 18
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
R2 Key Risks & Issues Summary FUJITSU
@ Key Risks @ Key Issues
m Release 2 may be delivered late: = POL still changing requirements &
* R1 doesn't free up resources / cancelling some projects (CTs)
test rigs in time mu Use Cases are required by
- R1 maintenance release(s), development but need to verify
decomm these do not change the
requirement
m Programme Plan & detailed plans
finalised
¢ R1 bug fixes into R2
¢ First release on top of HNG-X
* No time contingency in plans
m Release 2 budget overrun:
* Loss of key resources
¢ No budget contingency
¢ Estimates may be inaccurate
(estimating on top of HNG-X)
¢ Estimates are activity based
a POL Gateways may require
unestimated activities
a Early projects / parts req'd by POL
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 19
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
. foe)
R2 Key Milestones FUJITSU
Milestone Description Team/ Planned I Forecast Comment RAG
Project Date Date Status
CT’s submitted Change End Dec 10" Feb POCa & Camelot Cheques submitted.
(baseline) Process
CT’s approved (baseline) I POL End Jan 12" Feb 7 approved, 7 Overdue, 1 rejected.
2 to be approved.
Drop 1 to CIT DEV 1% Feb 10" Feb Work on R1 delayed drop
Drop 1 to Integration DEV 15" Feb 18" Feb Knock on from delay to start of CIT
SV&I Cycle 1 start TEST 1st Mar 18t Mar On target
SV&I Complete TEST 9" July 9" July
LST Start TEST 9" July 9" July
Start Model Office TEST 2"4 Aug 2"4 Aug
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 20
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
R2 Finance Summary FUJITSU
: R2 Financials
CTCost I Spendto I Remaining CAC I Variance
_ (£000) 31 Jan 10 Spend (£000) — (£000)
(£000) (£000) © ‘
TOTAL 2,182.1 493.5 1,663.2 2,156.7 25.4
For Fujitsu Eyes Only
21
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
Fe)
FUJITSU
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
Management
Project Management
ORequirements
DArchitecture
@ infrastructure
Development
Programme Office
OTest
gcs
Management E . . . : . . .
Project Management 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
Requirements 0.3 04 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DArchitecture 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0
infrastructure 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0
Development 18.2 14.7 10.2 9.2 5.5 5.5 0.0 0.0
Programme Office 2.3 23 2.3 2.3 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0
OTest 69 8.6 86 8.6 8.6 8.6 0.0 0.0
mcs 0.0 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.3 6.3 5.7 2.2
Period
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
R2 Help Needed FUJITSU
m™@ POL approvals
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 23
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
foe)
FUJITSU
Beyond HNGX R2 Progress Report
David Court
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 24
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
R4 Exec Summary FUJITSU
@ Key Challenges:
= Target Timescales
¢ Full Requirements complete — 01 February; Requirements still in progress
¢ Release to Model Office - 01 October; depends on estimates against full req’s
= TPOS! — Defining what FRES want to do; Option A or Option B
= To wrap or not!
@ Key Progress:
= Contents holding firm
* TPoS
¢ VAT on Postal Services
* PO Essentials
= Design Studies for all 3
* 1 CT submitted for TPOS
* 2 CRs received, to be CCB’ed
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 25
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
R5 Exec Summary FUJITSU
m Key Challenges:
= Target Timescales
¢ Draft Requirements 01 April 2010
¢ Full Requirements complete — 01 June 2010
¢ Release to Model Office - 01 January 2011
= Current candidates will reduce — size of Release left?
= Funding of early work
@ Key Progress:
u Release Candidate meeting held with POL
* Retail Stock Management
* Cheque Authorisation
* Santander
° Cut off Prompt
* Pre-Paid Debit Card
¢ Additional receipt text for banking transactions
* QAS Replacement
¢ Simple Sender Address Capture
* Mail Simplification
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 26
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
Fe)
FUJITSU
POLSAP Project Progress Report
Mike Nardin
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 27
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLSAP Red Major issue impacting timescales, cost or risk Fe)
Amber — Major issue but with actions agreed to resolve FU [TSU
RAG Summary Green _ No issues }
Current Description G2G plan G2G Target Date
Status
POL now driving overall plan (with POL,
FS and POL’s suppliers) to establish the
Current estimates exceed values agreed at BAR and extent! schedule for the remaining Phase
with customer. Being re-forecast now and will revisit I? WO'K.
Approved Budget finances once extent of delay is established to February 2010
determine full impact. Phase 2 not adjusted as yet. Fujitsu plan input sent to POL 1* week in
Feb. Still on target to re-baseline
finances in February.
New Infrastructure PM now in place and getting up to IFor CAT testing, seek formal acceptance
R . speed. from POL on risk. Ongoi
‘esourcing Customer lack of resources for CAT testing. Need focus from key resources on ngoing
Concerns over ownership and availability for POLSAP.I POLSAP.
POL driving overall plan (with POL, FS
New-Go Live date will be agreed with POL shortly, and POL’s suppliers) to establish the
Schedule following acceptance of the new plan. Current extent / schedule for the remaining Phase February 2010
aspiration is circa 25" May 2010. 1 work. Fujitsu input has been provided
and we await feedback.
Fujitsu have only just received the specifications for IPOL to have any changes in
Requirements User Roles from POL. These have been reviewed and] requirements flagged back to them via February 2010
4 it is anticipated that there will be an extra 10 days of I formal change control, with impact ry
work required. assessment.
A A technical solution needs to be agreed for CMS
Architecture Transtrack. N/A N/A
Apps Development complete as per planned work, but
Apps Development further work may be required as a result of additional / N/A N/A
modified / late requirements (see above).
28
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLSAP
RAG Summary (con)
RAG
Test
Migration
Infrastructure
Service
Transition
Contract
CRs
Current
Last StatusI Status
Red Major issue impacting timescales, cost or risk Fe)
Amber Major issue but with actions agreed to resolve FUJITSU
_ Green NoissueS
Description G2G plan G2G Target
Date
Collaborative Acceptance Testing is behind POL now driving overall plan (with POL, FS and POL’s
original schedule (due to complete w/c 8th suppliers) to establish the extent / schedule for the
March). remaining Phase 1 work.
Lack of POL resources for CAT Testing, therefore I POL test scripts had issues that needed resolving March 2010
not getting through scripts at required pace. Definition of User Roles only just received from POL.
3 key areas relating to CAT are: 1) Test Scripts & I Defects that are related to Fujitsu (Medium Severity) are
Review. 2) User Roles. 3) Defects. nearly all related to User Roles.
Data Migration is behind original schedule, as a i F .,
result of late delivery of extracts from CSC / Suppliers) to eee Fi hase rH aioan ale ite s February
Steria. We now have the extracts we need, and remaining Phase 1 work. 2010
the delivery mechanism (FTMS) has been set-up. 9 ”
OAT progressing to plan. There remains a risk of For Huthwaite, escalation under way to get circuit “as,
Infrastructure progress being delayed by lack of _ installation date. For routers, need to review whether it's
access to programme resources focussed on acceptable to order routers in advance of commercial .
HNG-X. Huthwaite remains a significant concern I cover. Ongoing
due to lack of installation date from Caw and lack! Continue to review opportunities to progress POLSAP
° approval to place routers on order. alongside other account work commitments.
Continuing to make progress on TFS design
ahead of implementation. A number of risks need I Position around service transition readiness to be reviewed] February
addressing around FCIL, Go Live date and as part of baselining of the new plan. 2010
knowledge transfer.
Working under interim ‘email’ commercial cover
fi POL. This is due t ire at th id of
March 2010. HS Is ue to expire at ne enc! ol Commercial trying to close CT and CCN. March 2010
Commercial trying to close CT and CCN
Huthwaite — CP428. CP428 requires urgent Fujitsu internal CCB approval rene
User Maint Service Response with POL to select an option.
A F Seeking further time from POL. Still with the CSA for
User Password Maint. Self Service - impact assessment.
29
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLSAP Exec Summary FUJITSU
m Key Challenges:
No agreed plan as yet between Fujitsu, POL and POL’s suppliers (including low-level
cutover plan). This is POL’s responsibility to pull together. However, the Fujitsu elements
have been sent to POL (Cutover weekend elements to follow shortly). We await feedback
from POL.
Financial forecasts will be revised in line with the revised plan as it is built. These will
exceed the figures agreed during previous BAR which raises concerns over POL’s
Business Case.
Commercially, Fujitsu are only covered until the end of March 2010. CT required to
provide proper cover.
Need to initiate Phase 2 initial stages and provide indicative figures.
Huthwaite:- Need a circuit delivery date, approved CT, and orders placed for routers.
Need focus from key resources on POLSAP now as we are at a critical part of the project.
m Key Progress:
Fujitsu elements of the POLSAP re-plan have been sent to POL (with the exception of the
cutover weekend). Initial Cutover weekend planning session has been held.
Data Migration: All Test Data outstanding from CSC/Steria were received w/c 18 Jan and
load completed. This means the only outstanding items for test cycle 1 and 2 are CMS
data.
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 30
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLSAP Key Risks & Issues Summary
Key Risks
Premature closure of POLSAP due to business
case erosion (escalating costs). Action: Agree
revised plan and costs with POL and formalise
commercially.
Potential for Post-Go Live Operational Issues due
to concessions made with testing scope. Action:
Addendum added to CBBP. Consideration of
SAP ‘Early Watch’ is under way.
Potential for reputational damage to Fujitsu due to
POL’s view that Fujitsu should be taking the lead
role. Action: Fujitsu to ensure that the
appropriate stakeholders within POL are aware of
their role and obligations as the lead and
integrator for POLSAP.
Continued slippage to infrastructure components
of plan due to reliance on shared resource pool
with HNG-X. Action: Continue to review
opportunities to progress POLSAP alongside
wider programme schedule.
Lack of an installation date for the Huthwaite link
and getting the CT agreed are increasing the risk
that the expanded link will not be in place prior to
Go Live. Action: Continue to push for CT
approval & link installation date. Consider
approval of router procurement @ commercial
risk. Push C&W for an installation date. Update
the plan as the Huthwaite situation becomes
clearer.
For Fujitsu Eyes Only
Sin
Fe)
FUJITSU
Key Issues
Insufficient resource levels and focus being
placed on POLSAP for key areas at a critical
stage of the project. Action: Need more cover
in these areas. The project is working with
management to address these issues and
prioritise where required.
Customer is currently trying to shift blame to
Fujitsu for POLSAP slippages. Action: Project
to liaise with management and commercial to
ensure appropriate protection for Fujitsu’s
interests.
Continued slippage to plan due to lack of
delivery / missed milestones from POL and their
sub-contractors. Action: Agree revised plan
and costs with POL and formalise
commercially.
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLSAP Key Milestones FUJITSU
Milestone Description I Team/ Planned I Forecast Comment RAG
Project Date (7 Date (28 Status
Dec Plan) Jan
Plan)
Integration Testing (Not Inc Apps 04/12/09 04/12/09 I Completed, but delayed by CSC/Steria, as
CMS) Complete well as taking longer than planned.
Collaborative Acceptance Apps 02/02/10 12/02/10 I Lack of POL Business User Test resources
Testing (Not Inc CMS) Issues with POL Test Scripts, and late
Complete definition of User Roles.
Data Migration Complete Apps 15/02/10 22/04/10 I Still awaiting CMS data extracts from CSC /
Steria.
CMS Integration Testing Apps 18/01/10 05/02/10
Complete
Infrastructure Inf 14/01/10 29/03/10 I There remains a risk of Infrastructure work
Implementation Complete being delayed due to lack of resource from
shared resource pool.
Infrastructure Testing Inf 29/03/10 29/03/10 I There remains a risk of Infrastructure work
Complete being delayed due to lack of resource from
shared resource pool.
Cutover Complete All 31/03/10 25/05/10 I Revised plan has been sent to POL, and we
await feedback. Low-level planning for the
cutover weekend itself will take place shortly.
Go-Live Complete All 31/03/10 25/05/10 I As Above.
Updated version of POLSAP plan yet to be agreed with POL. This applies to all planning elements.
For Fujitsu Eyes Only
32
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
POLSAP Fi S) ir
inance summary FUJITSU
Agreed ; Cumulative
CAC (Q1_ I Agreed CAC Spend to Date Remaining
Budget) (Feb FC) Variance (Jan-10) Spend
£000s £000s £000s £000s £000s
POLSAP Programme Resource
Costs 3,760.9 3,831.1 (70.2) 2746.5 1084.7
Hosting 84.7 92.8 (8.1) 64.7 28.1
Licences 28.1 35.2 (7.0) 14.1 21.1
Hardware 1155.8 1,155.8 0.0 1155.8 0.0
Expenses 103.9 108.1 (4.2) 83.2 24.9
TOTAL 5133.4 5223.0 (89.6) 4064.2 1158.8
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 33
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
Fe)
FUJITSU
Qty
POLSAP Resource Plan
Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10
Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10
Development 11 12 10 5 6 6 5 6 i)
infrastructure 15 9 2 1 1 1 3 2 0
Programme 3 4 3 1 1 4 1 1 0
OTest 1 0 0 i) 0 0 0 i} 0
Development
@iinfrastructure
OProgramme
OTest
FUJ00092960
FUJ00092960
-POLSAP Help Needed FUJITSU
I Continuation of assistance with prioritisation of programme resources to enable
POLSAP to meet it’s objectives.
@ Assistance with stakeholder management at the senior management level within
POL so they understand the nature of the challenges we face, with particular
reference to POL’s role as integrator and for POL to manage their suppliers
(CSC/Steria) to deliver within time and quality constraints, something that they have
not managed successfully to date.
@ Establish full commercial cover for by gaining CT/CCN approval.
@ Huthwaite CT: Need a date from C&W for installation and also need to place the
routers on order ASAP.
™@ Need resource commitment / help in key areas to help the project’s chances for
success.
For Fujitsu Eyes Only 35