FUJ00122130 - Email to Gareth GI Jenkins and Neneh Lowther from Penny Thomas Re: CS Witness Statement Amendment with attachments R v Teja WS

Evidence on official site

FUJ00122130

FUJ00122130
Message
From: Thomas Penny [/O=ICL/OU=UKSOUTH FELO1/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=THOMASP]
Sent: 24/11/2005 11:53:16
To: Jenkins Gareth Gl [/O=ICL/OU=ICL IT CONSULTANCY/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GARETH.JENKINS]
cc: Lowther Neneh [/O=ICL/OU=RETAIL REA24/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ILONAHN)]; Pinder Brian [/O=ICL/OU=UKSOUTH

FELO1/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PINDERB]; Sewell Peter (FELO1) [/O=ICL/OU=UKSOUTH
FELO1/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SEWELLP]

Subject: FW: CS Witness Statement Amendment

Attachments: 5b17.R vs Teja WS.doc

Hi Gareth
Neneh has said that you have kindly agreed to look at my mark up of the witness statement.
A lot of my comments relate to my general ignorance of how things work - Brian Pinder is dealing with these issues.

My immediate concerns are that I am not convinced that the statement is factually correct. I know about the demise of
OBCS, but I dont know when it was rolled out to the estate, did it happen overnight or was there are phasing out period? I
don't understand how network banking works (1 did look at the procedures you suggested but I was unable to put the
picture together) let alone provide the narrative. Is this something you could help us with?

Someone mentioned to me that reporting to the accounts department was no longer happening as we state - do you know
if this is the case?

If you could highlight anything in the statement which is not factually correct you would be doing us a great service.

Kind regards and many thanks
Penny

From: Lowther Neneh

Sent: 22 November 2005 10:25

To: Thomas Penny

Subject: FW: CS Witness Statement Amendment

-----Original Message-----

From: Jenkins Gareth GI

Sent: 17 November 2005 14:53

To: Lowther Neneh

Subject: RE: CS Witness Statement Amendment

Neneh,

I've updated the Witness Statement as discussed.

I'm left some of the Networking bit highlighted in Blue, since I can’t say that I know it is true (but it probably is). It may be
OK just to delete that bit. What is left in that section may be sufficient (1 guess it depends upon what the issue is!) I’ve
removed the blue highlighting from the rest of the document.

I've used “Revisions” so that you can see what I've changed. I've highlighted the Date etc in yellow to remind us to
update it for the final version.

Happy to discuss further.

Regards
FUJ00122130
FUJ00122130

Gareth

This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are confidential and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail
has not been intercepted and amended or that itis virus-free.

Gareth Jenkins
Distinguished Engineer
Applications TDA

Post Office Account

Fujitsu Services

Tel:
Mobile:
email:
Web:

Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 26, Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1SL

From: Lowther Neneh
Sent: 15 November 2005 13:40

To: Jenkins Gareth GI

Subject: CS Witness Statement Amendment
Hi, Gareth,

Just a little note to remind you of the above for sometime on Thursday or Friday. Thank you

Kind regards,

Neneh Lowther
Customer Services - Post Office Account- Security

Fujitsu Services, Forest Road, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 7HJ

Web: <Iup:/serviees fujtsu.com>

Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 26, Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1SL

This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not
guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free.