FUJ00152816
FUJ00152816
From: Dunks Andy[/O=EXCHANGE/OU=ADMINGROUP1/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ANDY_DUNKS]
Sent: Tue 23/06/2009 9:09:45 AM (UTC)
To: john.longman@,
Cc: +! Gallacher
Subject: FW: WS for West Byfleet HSH calls
John,
Can you let me know for definite if you want these details, as we will have to get started asap if you want them by 26th
June (with no interruptions that is..).
Andy Dunks
Security Team
Royal Mail Group Account
Fujitsu Services
Ath. Floor..Lovelace. Road. Bracknell. Berkshire. RG12 8SN
O
Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22, Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW.
This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are confidential and may be privileged. Fujitsu does
not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free
From: Dunks Andy
Sent: 22 June 2009
To: ‘john.longman¢
Cc: dave.posnett@. GRO Gallacher Kirsty
Subject: RE: WS for West Byfleet HSH calls
John,
107 calls may seem a lot but that only equates to approximately 3-4 calls a month over the time frame. To add the
information you want is going to take 1 to 2 days of uninterrupted work to complete. So to get it completed by the 26th
June is not impossible it would be cutting it fine as we had not factored this in to the time scales of the original request.
If you need the extra detail I will enquire about when we can get this to you..
Andy Dunks
Security Team
Royal Mail Group Account
Fujitsu Services
4th Floor. Lovelace Road. Bracknell. Berkshire. RG12 8SN
Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22, Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-
mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are confidential and may be privileged. Fujitsu does not
guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free
FUJ00152816
FUJ00152816
oo Original Message-
From: john.longman
Sent: 22 June 2009 15:
To: Dunks Andy
Cc: dave.posnett@
Subject: Re: WS for West Byfleet HSH calls
Andy
The statement is fine but the mention of 107 calls will no doubt interest the defence barrister. If possible could you
include in the statement a breakdown of the calls to cover time/date/nature of call. If we don't include it now the defence
will only request this information later.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic08429.jpg)