FUJ00179872 - Email from Jason Muir to Matthew Lenton, Farzin Denball cc: Dave Ibbett RE: Your witness statement- now v6

Evidence on official site

FUJ00179872
FUJ00179872

From:

Sent:
To:

Cc:

Subject:
Attachment:

Hi Matthew,

Muir, Jason[/O=FUJITSU EXCHANGE ORGANIZATION/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE
GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BDC2EB2BC40846849C03D237942]

Wed 26/09/2018 1:10:44 PM (UTC)

4; Denbali,

RE: Your witness statement - now v6 [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

_E-MAIL_151998716(1)_25 Sep 18 Witness Statement of Torstein O Godeseth v6-Questions for
Sec Ops-ML JM UPDATE.docx

Please see attached latest version with my comments. Let me know if we need to talk through

them.
Regards,

Jason Muir

Operational Security Manager

Post Office Account

Fujitsu

or Internally

or Internally I

From: Lenton, Matthew

Sent: 26 September 2018 1.

To: Muir, Jason <_
Ce: Ibbett, Dave <__

Denbali, Farzin <

Subject: RE: Your witness statement - now v6 [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

No idea why that was, please see this attachment.

Matthew Lenton

Post Office Account Document Manager
P&PS, Digital Technology Services

Fujitsu

From: Muir, Jason

Sent: 26 September 2018 12:4:

To: Lenton, Matthew
Cc: Ibbett, Dave <.

tkshire, RG12 BSN

GRO_

Subject: RE: Your witness statement - now v6 [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

Hi Matthew,

The document you attached to your email was blank?
FUJ00179872
FUJ00179872

Regards,

Jason Muir
Operational Security Manager

Post Office Account

Fujitsu

From: Lenton, Matthew
Sent: 26 September 2018 12:33
To: Muir, Jason

Cc: Ibbett, Dave < SRO. ane!
Subject: RE: Your witness statement - now v6 [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

enbali, Farzin <}

Jason, Farzin,
There are some questions for the Sec Ops team in Torstein’s draft witness statement to which WBD are seeking

answers today, please.

Please see questions at the following sections:

1. 7.13

2. 7.13.4

3. 7,.14—not sure it is quite clear what is being looked for here, but see Alan Holmes’s comment on the same
section. Are you able to provide examples of other queries that are resolved using ARQs, i.e. other than
transaction data?

4. 11.3.2—do you have the records in terms of numbers of such users as described in 11.3.1 (as that is what is
being asked, rather than who they were)

5. 11.3.8—do you know the reason for this change of policy in July 2015? Is this process documented ina
Dimensions document so that we can just quote the reference?

Matthew Lenton
Post Office Account Document Manager
P&PS, Digital Technology Services

Fujitsu
Lovelace Road. Bracknell._Berkshire, RG12 8SN
Phone: GRO

Email”
Web: hits

From: Jonathan Gribbe:
Sent: 26 September 2018 11:17
To: Godeseth, Torstein <_
Cc: Lenton, Matthew <¢
Parsons <

Subject: RE: Your witness statement - now v6 [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

bbett, Dave

Torstein,
Thank you for this. I'll review it ASAP.
FUJ00179872
FUJ00179872

Matthew/Dave — can you ensure that the questions to be addressed by others are addressed during the course of
today please?

Kind regards
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben

Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP

Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts

womblebonddickinson.com

WOMBLE
BOND

DICKINSON Ain)

From: Torstein.O.Godeset
Sent: 26 September 2018 11:13
To: Jonathan Gribben
Cc: Matthew.Lentor,

Subject: RE: Your witness statement - now v6 [WI

} Andrew Parsons
7032497]

Jonny,
I have now completed my pass through the document and attach a marked up version. There are clearly a number of
questions for others to address.

I have a concern that whilst we talk about the use of BTs in Horizon Online I don’t see any equivalent statement
about Legacy Horizon; on this I would have to rely on others in any case as I was not working within Fujitsu at that
time.

I will now go through the document yet again checking, but I think it makes sense to share it in its current state.

Regards etc
Torstein

From: Jonathan Gribben <_
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018
To: Godeseth, Torstein <i
Cc: Lenton, Matthew
Parsons ¢.
Subject: RE: Your witness statement - now v5 [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

Ibbett, Dave ; Andrew

Torstein,
Thank you for this. Re section 9, the Court will be determining the distinct issues set out below which means that I
don't think we can change the definition of access from read only to ability to change (as they are distinct issues):-
FUJ00179872
FUJ00179872

v Were Post Office and/or Fujitsu able to access transaction data recorded by Horizon remotely (i.e. not from
within a branch)?

vv Did Post Office and/or Fujitsu have the ability/facility to: (i) insert, inject, edit or delete transaction data or data
in branch accounts; (ii) implement fixes in Horizon that had the potential to affect transaction data or data in
branch accounts; or (iii) rebuild branch transaction data:

o atall;
© without the knowledge of the Subpostmaster in question; and
o without the consent of the Subpostmaster in question?

Let me know if you'd like a call to discuss.
Kind regards
Jonny

Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP

womblebonddickinson.com

DICKINSON y ©

From: Torstein.O.Godesetht GRO. i
Sent: 25 September 2018 16:11
To: Jonathan Gribben

Cc: Matthew.Lentor,
Subject: RE: Your witness statement [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497] - now v5

Jonny,
Please find attached where I have got to. I have been through sections 1-8 and I don’t see any major problems in
there. I have suggested changes in a few places — as much to fit my style as anything else.

I have another session now and so whilst I may get more done today I thought I would let you have this as a WIP. In
any case I have most of tomorrow earmarked for this.

Could you agree this asa hope I have given you enough clues as to

why.

Regards etc
Torstein

From: Jonathan Gribben <._.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 12:48 PM
To: Godeseth, Torstein ¢

FUJ00179872
FUJ00179872

Cc: Newsome, Pete ¢ GRO }; Lenton, Matthew I GRO .

iLucy Bremner

te = X H
Subject: Your witness statement [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

Torstein,

Further to our exchange of emails earlier today please find attached an updated version of your statement. You'll see
that it contains some comments and questions for you in bold square brackets and some of the comments added by
your colleagues.

I'd be grateful if you'd review the draft in full and fill in the gaps as soon as possible. Will you be able to get it back to
me today please?

Kind regards
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben

Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP

womblebonddickinson.com

\

Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this em:

The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidentia
access this e-mail and tachments. If you are not torstein.o.god:
Unauthorised use, dissemination, distribution, publication or copyin

personal data is in our Privacy Policy on our website.

and protected by law. t
se notify jonathan. gribbe

hments is prohibited

only is authorised to

‘and delete any copies.
ation about how we use

GRO.

ttached to this e-mail will have be
‘hich ma

Any files
loss or

hecked by us with virus detection software before transmission, Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP accepts no lia

bbe caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.

Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP, is neither given nor endorsed by it.

This email is sent by Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP which is a limited liability partnership registered in Englan
is 4 More London Riverside, London, SEL 2AU, where a
or consultant who is of equivalent standing. Our VAT registration number is GB

and Wales under number OC317661. Our registered office

list of members’ nan to inspection, We use the term partner to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee

Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is
services in the US, the UK, and elsewh
can bind or obligate, another Womble Bon
www. womblebonddickinson.com/legal notices for further details.

nember of Womble Bond Dickinson (Intemational) Limited, which consists of independent and autonomous law firms providing
found the world. Each Womble Bond Dickinson entity is

entity and is not responsible for the acts or omissions of, nor

Dickinson entity. Womble Bond Dickinson (Intemational) Limite not practice law. Please see

Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is authorised and re

lated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
FUJ00179872
FUJ00179872

Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.

This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.

Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.

This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.