FUJ00232731 - POA Improvements - Steams 5-7

Evidence on official site

FUJ00232731

FUJ00232731
POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required
FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)
Changes in v1.1
1. Split master document to place Streams 5-7 in a separate document
2. Updated Actions
Page I 1

le name
e Browell

FUJ00232731

FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7

Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

Contents
What’s New?...

Introduction & Overview...

The Goal.......

Purpose & Scope.

The Streams...

Stream 5 — Security Improvements.....

SecOps BAU...

Additional Items...
Actions...
System Changes.

One-Time Actions...

New Ways of Working...

Stream 6 — Elevated Access & Tooling.

Actions.
One-Time Actions.

Stream 7 — Various

Actions....

One-Time Actions....

Page I 2

See file name

Steve Browell

FUJ00232731
FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

What's New?

This document describes a number of changes to the Post Office Account ways of working and use
of systems. This section provides highlights but the entire document should be read to gather
awareness of all changes being implemented.

Our interactions needs to be system and process driven, not people and experience — and that will
create a clear audit trail too.

We need to limit the dependency on meeting-specific reports or embedded tables in minutes to show
progress on important matters.

Transparency is key — to the fullest sensible extent, POL need to see everything — and they need to
be able to see it in their systems or from consistent reports from our systems. That way, POL are
informed and able to make decisions for us or with us.

Page I 3
1 & Last updated: See file n:
ent owner Steve Bre

FUJ00232731
FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

Introduction & Overview

The Goal...
To implement the defined list of improvements in this document in substantive part by...

31° July 2021

...and to have completed all improvement including any early challenges and snags by

31% August 2021

Purpose & Scope

o Byrunning a series of Streams of work we will systematically drive improvements across
POA

o The Streams will likely overlap and may well change format as progress is made
o Although active participation in a Stream may be low for.some, it is critical that there is a

common understanding or we will not achieve cross functional change

Stream members may change over time

Each Stream will have a set of actions to complete = initially derived from this document

The team can add additional actions as needed

POA needs to urgently evolve to a cross functionally agreed set of ways of working so that it

can be explained to any interested party,withease

o Our interactions needs to be system and process driven not people and experience — and
that will create a clear audit trail too

o Weneed to limit the dependency on meeting-specific reports or embedded tables in minutes
to show progress on important matters

o Transparency is key — to the fullestsensible extent, POL need to see everything — and they
need to be able to see it in their systems or from consistent reports from our systems. That
way, POL are informed and.able to make decisions for us or with us

o We need to agree'the functions of the various platforms and meetings to ensure it all joins up
(this document is astart)

co If POL is»tracking it — or applying governance to it — then so should we — and our process
should be in advance of theirs so we have no surprises

o We.do not have all the tools and integrations we would like, so the goal is to make the best
possibleuse of what we have already

o Weneed to protect our internal systems from a need for routine disclosure — so we can work
our way

o We need to ensure any POL desires on our ways of working relate to contracted obligations
and suit how our systems and people work — unless we are commissioned to change any of
those — as this is more likely to be consistent and reliable

o For this to succeed we need considerable cross functional support coupled with manager and
team member engagement

0000

The Streams
e Stream 5 - Security Improvements

e Stream 6 - Elevated Access & Tooling
e = Stream 7 - Various

Page I 4
Version & Last updated: See file n
Document owner Steve Bre

FUJ00232731

FUJ00232731
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required
FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)
Each Stream documents the key elements that reinforce an existing way of working or state a new
way of working. This content will be embedded into existing account documents for it to be
formalised. Each Stream will then contain references to any System Changes made (optional), the
One-Time Actions needed to move to the defined ways of working, and then the New Ways of
Working that will describe what is different from how things are done today.
Actions that have been completed are scored out. The One-Time Actions that are underway at the
moment are highlighted in green although some of the other actions may also be partly active too.
Page I 5
See file nan

Steve B
FUJ00232731

FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

Stream 5 — Security Improvements
o Team — Geoff Baker & Jason Muir

SecOps BAU
o Priority - Geoff
e Validate PAM roles for Belfast teams. The superuser roles should be the minimum
possible to achieve the operational responsibilities
* DONE
e Ensure current levels of logging meet MSCF and contract obligations
= Corporate Confusing
e Shore up the internal PAM monthly verification processes, and add ajreport and
governance for ISM and CISO review
= New process, documented, PAM verification good, standard account
verification has a few offenders to chase, add/to ISMRislides in future
e All POA users must be reminded that they must followithe account UAM and PAM
processes
o TBC
« Review SVM/SEC/PRO/0012 and check that the 57 RBAC entries are still correct
despite it saying last reviewed 19/08/2020
= FD working on it
e JML form does not link clearly to. ROLE and RBAC
e Account creation - Wintel & other account creation functions should not use cloning
= AD (role based in place apart from SOC users as still WIP), Peak (working
on it), TSNow
= RBAC list accurate, JMb,form linked, access derived from that
e Define reports and. audience (perhaps all PAM roles) — what do SecOps actually
track
e Define governance to be applied — what do SecOps check is ok and action
e Update all telated documents on UAM and PAM — and contract documents if needed
= .SVM/SEC/PRO/0006 has been retired
« Look into,additional logging, reporting and review of Remote Connectivity activity —
or.describe ‘as is’ and seek agreement
=», Now have failed logins in SecOps report from Sept issue

Additionattems:
o  Priority- Jason
® Sorvlexplaii pliantadmi ts that cont gregation-of duty rul
(to-EBMS)
= Auser account that has admin rights that is used for non-admin activities
meaning there could be accidental use of elevated privileges
= Based on clarification we have none in this category
e Establish a central register of shared, break-glass and local admin accounts —
records of and management of (discovery and processes). Arrange call with Jill
Smyth, Andy Gibson, John Bradley, Chris Harrison, Gerald Barnes, Geoff Baker,
Andy Hemmingway, Tariq Arain, Matt Swain cc: Steve Bansal, Simon Wilson,
Graham Allen
= Consider...
e Upgrade KeePass to commercial version/better solution
e Add KeePass content to weekly report

Page I6
Version & Last updated See file n
Document owner Steve Bre

FUJ00232731

FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

= Action
e Jason has responses from all
« Automated baseline deployment uses service accounts that are held
in BigFix - and there are 200 or so of these
e Jason trying to catch John Alcock to get ECS support
e Jason to tell owners there are minimum obligations if they are to
retain ownership
© Confi ing-of the PCI pen test obligations in the Security Service Descripti
o TBC
e Investigate the use of the remote Syslog server and determine if any logging should
be directed to Netcool. Capacity issues may limit options

= 23.07
ad

RE Syslog
Netcool.msg

e All of the network (incl. firewall) logs are sent to the Syslog servers.
This is good for two reasons: 1)rlt,is best practice to keep your logs
off the security platform that may be compromised then it is not easy
for the adversary to delete the logs to cover their tracks and 2)
Having a central log store makes applying SIEM type intelligence
(and doing debugging) easier than having to collect it directly.

« Netcool was never sized to handle the network logs so it only
collects what it.considers’are “interesting” events. You probably
recall that we had similar issues with the Linux and Windows logs
under HDCR when we increased the logging to capture forensic
detail/but Netcool / Tivoli couldn't cope with the volume. And of
course;Post Office have rejected funding a proper SIEM solution.

« sTherefore,we have a lot of network security information in the
Syslog servers but it is not monitored or analysed for issues.

* Action

o What is “interesting” —- John Bradley says it is not
documented but is in a baseline
= We filter out by exception and Jason is waiting for

this

= Need to check this doesn’t exclude things we want to
cover

= What's we keep goes to Netcool and to Audit
Archive

o How long do we keep the syslog events for?
= Forever if in Audit Archive
« Counter access — why are counters accessed so frequently, should access be on
request not by default to protect our staff and the company from incorrect
accusations.
= Action
e We need to restrict RCA capability to escalate privileges
e We need to confirm that RCA commands are read only
« We need to confirm with CC that the user account on the counter are
read only
o All documented in DES/GEN/SPE/2745

Page I7
Version & Last updated See file n
Document owner Steve Bre

FUJ00232731

FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

Actions

System Changes
o TBC

One-Time Actions
Priority

1.

Belfast teams creating new granular specific admin roles and assigning,team to more
specific responsibilities. Impact has been a reduction of admin rights from,56 to 34.
Implemented monthly (weekly) verification ‘
DONE

4 St indi t+ UAM-and- RAM-proces:

a.
Z dJasoniSte firra-understanding-of PCL pi ing-obligations.
a Th lust Be initiated by POL furtheracti quired

New Ways of Working

1. Geoff -PAM verification process to be reported on monthly within SecOps governance (to
include, routine validation of superuser roles)

2. Geoff — operate the monthly PAM verification process to a higher-level of rigour

3. SecOps - Maintain records of all shared/service/local admin accounts and spot check the
processes around them

Page I 8
Version & Last updated: See file name
Document owner: Steve Browell
FUJ00232731
FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

Stream 6 — Elevated Access & Tooling
o Team - Varied. Mostly a one-time action stream

Actions

One-Time Actions
APPSUP
1.

2. Adam - Ensure 4 eyes/peer review happens - NWH or OOH
3. Steve Br — Amend both organisations’ Change Control documents to show APPSUP is
allowed out of process

APPSUP — non-BRDB
1.
2.
3. Steve Br — Notify POL of action taken

Interface Interactions Logging

Page I 9
Version & Last updated: See file name
Document owner: Steve Browell
FUJ00232731

FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7

Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

Stream 7 — Various
o Team - Varied. Mostly a one-time action stream

Actions

One-Time Actions

Historical Inves'

process
3. Steve Br — All staff must realise the need to demand a TfSNow ticket is.raised’by POL
(hence the above intercept will apply) — it cannot come in via email only

Monthly SMR pack
1. Steve Ba/Sandie — Limited Incident data - add trending and patterns
2. Steve Ba/Sandie — Highlights page is largely of no value.
3. Steve Ba/Sandie — Some cumulative failures are not carried forward in stats columns
4. Steve Ba/Sandie — We embed minutes of other meetings and list Incidents - it's overly

padded

5. Steve Ba/Sandie — Needs to add links to HDR Defects,

Peripheral Key Logger :
1. Steve Br —- Decommission functionality as. notused

Documente

.

ation

Steve Browell asked Dean Bessell again on Thursday 24th June 2021 to check with
Lorna Owens and get.us a decision. CBIF 12.07.2021 has shown some POL
confusion that will be addressed at CBIF 19.07.2021

This is progressing.under FOC CWO and will likely be in the next counter release in
2022Q1

1. Steve Br/Matt L —We need to get all fundamental content gaps identified and actions
assigned

.

Outstanding CCD actions
Service Descriptions
Referenced documents in the contract

2. Steve Br/Matt L — Document list:

Page I 10

Security Service Description SVM/SDM/SD/0017

Governance Schedule A2 — names, chair and scope of meetings

ASM Schedule I2 - BIF definition, Peak and KB proprietary references, POL KB
references for approved BEDs

Testing Strategy - 0936 document

The CBA document Simon mentioned had the wrong Windows version in it
SVM/SDM/SD/0003 — DC Ops SD - states plans we should be creating [looks to be
ok — Steve Br to double check]

Change Control to mention APPSUP-

Application Support Strategy to mention Peak and Live Defect Management

Version & Last updated: See file name
Document owner Steve Browell
FUJ00232731
FUJ00232731

POA Improvements — Streams 5-7
Improved Ways of Working & Actions Required

FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL USE ONLY (POA ONLY)

Governance
1.
2.
3. Steve Br/Dan — Working list of key meetings (POL attempting to lead on this):
a) Governance Meeting (Supplier Meeting)
b) Demand Planning
c) RAM/RAB
d) Change Control

tings

Page I 11
Version & Last updated: See file name
Document owner: Steve Browell