NFSP00000558 - NFSP report of a meeting of the council on 25 - 26 March 2019

Evidence on official site

FOR USE OF COUNCIL MEMBERS ONLY

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SUBPOSTMASTERS

REPORT OFA
MEETING OF THE

COUNCIL

held on

25 & 26 MARCH 2019

at

HOLIDAY INN CAMDEN LOCK
LONDON

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

em
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558
Report of a Meeting of the Council
held on Monday & Tuesday, 25 & 26 March 2019
at Holiday Inn Camden Lock,
London

Those present: Nilesh Joshi Chairman

Calum Greenhow Chief Executive

Tim Boothman

Susan Edgar

Uel Houston

Saj Hussain

Susan Jude

Paul McBain

Jim Nott (part)

Stuart Rogers

Bharat Visani

Yvonne Fennell Spar UK

David Sanghera Rymans
in attendance; Troy Gardner Director of Commercial & Retail

lan Park NC Facilitator & Operations Officer

Keith Richards Security & Network Transformation

Peter Hall Head of Policy & Research :

Paul Simmonds Director of Operations I
Apologies: Kevin Hogarth WH Smith

The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting. The meeting would open with a
discussion in relation to the recent court case and the resulting Judge's ruling.

COURT CASE (see Appendix A for presentation)

CEO opened with a brief run-down of the past, the present and the future.

The NFSP had nothing to do with the case but got caught up in it. NFSP needed to
reassure members, branches and regions. May assist with ways to improve PO for the

benefit of the whole network.

Historically, as an organisation, network and market sector, things have gone from one
problem to another over the last 20 years.

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

A15 year agreement with PO was signed by the NFSP. That agreement was properly
negotiated, In response to a question as to whether PO could walk away, the response €
was that the only way would to be pay the balance of the money for the rest of the
contract. However that was not on the table or being looked at. It would be a breach of I
contract. Subpostmasters were investors In the network, and want PO to be both I
successful and viable. If they cut income they would not have a network. NFSP role and
aim, and no desire to have other organisations involved.

Made clear that it was a Special Conference overwhelming decision to adopt the MOU
and agreement with PO, Roadshows were held all around the UK.

General outrage that the Judge should see fit to cast aspersions about the NFSP who
played no part in the trial, gave no evidence, were not asked for documentation, or given
the right to defend ourselves.

The subject of mutualisation was raised. It had been part of the NT2 discussions but the
government did not deliver of FOoG. Income of PO fell and resulted in a change of
viewpoint and business model.

On the issue of the income guarantee for those who converted to Mains, many members
did not understand the offer which was that ‘they would earn no less as a Mains than
they would have previously’ with any shortfall being made up annually. Salaries were
compared on a like for like basis, so if an office had falling customer numbers and
transactions, they would have earned less as a traditional anyway. Some members were
wrongly blaming the NFSP.

There was wider discontent within the network. The finger could be pointed at
stakeholders - PO, RM and Government ~ as members feel let down. For some members,
they see the NFSP as being part of the problem.

Felt that there were many misunderstandings relating to the court case. Some believed
it was about Horizon however it wasn’t. The first case related to 23 common issues and
whether the contract was fair. The second case taking place related to Horizon.

Felt that PO had not helped the issue.

There had been no good reason to introduce the Grand Funding Agreement into the
court case.

NFSP neither supported nor opposed the litigation. There was no judgement against the
NFSP therefore there was no cause to appeal. NFSP could only use public opinion to
refute the Judge’s comments.

The NFSP had taken legal advice. Because the decision of the Judge had caused
reputational damage to us as an organisation, on that basis we could appeal. However, if
we did it would be prohibitively expensive, time consuming and the chances of success
were low.

Update was that the Judge had been asked to recuse himself from the second trial
which may result in a retrial. Questions were raised over his independence and started
with an opinion formed rather than considering the evidence hence creating an unfair
trial. This was very serious for the Judge. PO had yet to decide whether to appeal
against the decision. (I

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 3
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

Relationship was now on a different footing. There followed a discussion on mediation,
which was clarified. Mediation would come into play if, for instance, PO tried to get out

of the contract and all attempts at resolving the situation failed. It would then be
referred to CEDR.

CEO to make contact with CEDR to clarify the process with them should a conflict arise
in the future.

Judges rule was that the Contract was incorrect on 23 counts, Asked if the NFSP should
go to POL and say that the contract has been ruled wrong and ask them to amend.

To reassure members the Board needs to ensure they do not take a knee jerk reaction.
Have over the past year tried to bring some specialisation within the Board and for them
to understand roles and responsibilities,

The Board needs to support, help and respectfully challenge each other to ensure that
the representation the Board gives to members is the best it can possibly be.

One role was the Legal and Regulatory role. A role which is vitally important going
forward,

The Judge stated that the NFSP placed its interest above those of its members, we refute
that.

The Judge stated that business as usual work on the Website demonstrates our intent to
bolster POs position regarding transparency. We refute that.

He questioned that there was any appreciable negotiation regarding Network
Transformation contract. We refute that.

He questioned the NFSP not publishing the Grant Funding Agreement. We refute that. {
Clause 31 of the GFA deals with mediation. He made no mention of this in his I
Judgement.
Clause 31 also allows for escalations of disputes if an impasse is reached. i
Mediation can be internal or external.

NFSP wanis the relationship between Post Office and the Network to be a peaceful, joint
and cooperative one.

The NFSP does however have the opportunity to go external for mediation.

The NFSP as an organisation will support, engage and protect its members. It puts the
interests of members’ number one.

The person that takes on the legal and regulatory role will collect and collate all
members’ contract issues and any anomalies, inconsistencies that show up will be dealt
with.

Training will be given to those representatives of the NFSP to guide them at interviews
held between post office and members.

Will ensure there is a suitable escalation process in place.

Fundamentally the NFSPs ability to challenge the Post Office is already written into the
contact.

The CEO and the elected person to the legal and regulatory role will meet with CEDR to
establish the principals of mediation. This will be taken to Post Office and will report
back at Conference.

Nilesh Joshi was proposed to be the person to take on the role. The proposal was
carried at the vote. DECISION/ACTION
Anyone that deals with interviews will give feedback to Nilesh Joshi.

Support to be given to Nilesh Joshi.

Members to be advised that they can go to Nilesh and he can disseminate where
necessary.

Need to be consistencies throughout the network when interviews take place.

Would be very expensive to refute what the judge has said.

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 4

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

Decided to do a PR exercise to get the message out to members. .
A letter will be sent out with a Q&A providing information, clarification and reassurance ¢
on what the NFSP is doing. This was circulated to the Board.

Will have professional assistance on media monitoring and engagement to take control

of the external narrative.

The objective is to rebuff the Judges criticism of the NFSP.

Will communicate the positive advantages of being a member of the NFSP and focus on

the resources that the organisation provides in relation to the Mails and Retail tearms and

the Board.

UPDATE I
In relation to the mediation process. CEO had spoken to PO in the morning about the

decision made the previous day. NFSP would arrange a meeting with CEDR to set up
the principles of the mediation process.

Discussion in June 2018 with the Board (see Appendix C) about creating specialisation
on the Board and getting more involvement from Directors but recognising that the role
of Director is part time. Would like more involvement from the Board to represent the €
interests of members better. We want someone to deal with public affairs in relation to
local government, public affairs in Westminster and the devolved assemblies. Tim
Boothman is Chair of the Board of Benevolence, either Tim or Sue Edgar would be Chair
or Vice Chair with those roles and responsibilities. Additional roles for members of the
Board. If there was a role any Director wanted to take on, they should put their name
forward to the CEO and talk to him in relation to those roles. Only person who came
forward was Nilesh Joshi in relation to Legal & Regulatory. Looking for some help and
support. Want Board to represent the interests of members.

CEO would report at the pre conference Board meeting on the mediation and Board
would decide whether it should be announced. Purpose of the mediation process
clarified.

1 REPORTS & RESOLUTIONS OF COUNCIL MEETINGS

{a) The Report of the Council meeting of 18 & 19 June 2018 was

signed as a true record, DECISIO¥

(b) The Resolutions passed at the Council meeting of 18 & 19 June

2018 were signed as a true record. [DECISION
(c) Action Points. All either dealt with or being dealt with.
(d) There were no matters arising.

Board Meeting “25 & 26 March 2019 Page 5
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

2. CEO REPORT

° The Director of Operation’s report had been circulated prior
to the meeting.

a) Political Engagement

Kelly Tolhurst, 25 February 2019

° Appears that Kelly Tolhurst ‘gets it’, and understands the
difficulties we face. She refers to subpostmasters as
‘investors in the network’,

° Presented the work the NFSP do with the Retail and Mails
Teams to support members and help them grow their
business.

° She understood the desire to protect’ members
investments. Government want fully viable Post Office, and
want it to ‘work’.

* — The government had invested significant funds and it had
to work. She sees the NFSP as part of the solution,

° We will continue to work with her and her officials to put
forward the network's narrative within that environment.

APPG, 26 February

° Attended by the ACS, Citizens Advice, FSB, Countryside
Alliance, CWU and NFSP,

e Rival organisation claimed that NT consultations were not
fit for purpose. Refuted by CAB. In 73% of cases they played
a significant part in the decision making process.

. Conversation moved on to points scoring. Brought in the
Countryside Alliance. We encouraged the ACS, etc, to get i
involved in the debate. Supporting of the aims of PO within }
the rural network, which was very different to the urban
network,

. Transformation programme on Crown offices being moved
into WH Smith. CWU trying to block the move.

° Postbank also raised by the CWU. Goes back many years,
and the banking market has moved on. It has had a
significant impact on the number of transactions within a
branch that was closing. Postbank would be going
backwards.

e As an organisation the NFSP need to be part of decisions
rather than go backwards,

. PO deliberately excluded from the discussions, If
performance ts to improve the relationship between PO and
the network and viability of PO overall. To try and move
without them being present was not the tight course of
action.

. PO would be invited to future meetings.

° Made clear that in some cases, CAB have blocked and NT
move and resulted in a spm handing in their keys to a total
loss of service rather than a move as there were no other
options, There should be a trade off as to what is best for
the customer.

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 6

© National Federation of SubPostmasters

Need to get interested parties together and talk about the
way forward in those cases.

There were cases where PO wanted the branch to move but
CAB blocked it at consultation.

Comment made that they should get their MP involved.
NFSP policy was to protect our members investments, not
to protect the government's investment. They had invested
£2.4 billion up to March 2021. Maybe NFSP should be more
up front when challenging them.

There was a lot of work going on in the background, and
the government were not accepting everything PO were
saying.

NESP should shout about what it does more.

Royal Mail

Tim Boothman, Paul Simmonds and Calum Creenhow met
on 14 February to discuss mails.

Needed to know where they were with negotiations and
also had discussions on the Christmas performance, which
was 4.9% up on the previous year.

Christmas was the worst on the high street for 10 years. The
whole high street was down on trading. Post offices were
part of that situation.

As a single entity PO chased market share. 49 million
footfall.

Stalemate with negotiations. Nothing to update. PO
playing low key as RM did .not want exclusivity to expire.
Share price and brand had hit the floor. RM would look for
savings.

We met Stephen Agar and Anna Malley of RM. Not much
to report. Mentioned several times that RM wanted to
incentivise spms. When asked to expand they had yet to
work out how.

Belief was they were trying to play the NFSP off to make PO
the ‘bad guy’. Were also asking what PO paid spms.
Excellent work by the Mails Seg team. They were making a
difference to mail segregation. RM congratulated the NFSP
on the work being done. 4.9% difference to overall mail
compliance. £900k paid to spms last year. Hoping for
£2.1m for this year but awaiting confirmation. Achieved
letters and large letters. Closer to 1* and 2" class packets.
Challenging RM in relation to targets and how they are
recorded. Checking RM. Using data to identify anomalies
at a sorting office. Very close to all targets.

In response to a question clarified that PO and Payzone
were working as two separate businesses. Couple of
contracts had been won with exclusivity to the two
networks, Scottish Power was not on Payzone. Bidding as a
combined network, but currently some would be separate.

Strictly Private & Confidential

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019

Page 7
© National Federation of SubPostmasters

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Strictly Private & Confidential

c) HMRC

° Applies to those on traditional/community contracts.

° Will take effect from April 2019,

. NFSP had negotiated with HMRC for 4 years, Intention had
been to impose in April 2017.

° NFSP had prevented that and negotiated changes to
reduce the impact on members as much as possible.

° Only applied to those on the old contract. Used to get
abatement for NI on staff and non-staff costs. Tax will be on
the same basis.

° PO say every office affected had been written to.

° Rent, rates, maintenance, electricity, gas for the year. Spms
needed to submit staff and non staff costs. Tax would be
calculated in a matrix style form and would be finalised at
the end of the year.

° Example: £4,000 per month earnings from PO
Staff and non staff costs submitted at £2,000 per month
Tax would be calculated minus the £2,000 and the rest
taxed.

At the end of the year would be the whole £48,000 for the
business to work out how much the spm should pay and
deduct the tax already paid.

° Fact sheet being prepared to send to every affected spm to
give to their accountant.

e Does not apply to those on Local or Main contracts.

d) Network Restructure

. PO restructured their respective sides of the business,

° Tom Moran leaving after conference. His remit would be
taken into Amanda Jones role.

e . NFSP told PO for a long time that isolation was an issue as
they only visited larger mains offices, Not good enough.

e Spms were desperate to have help and support.

. PO now have field team, 94 Area Managers with 9 Regional
Managers dealt with under Head of Agency. PO had
recognised that they do not serve their branch network well
enough.

° That included many processes to improve agency
conformance and engagement to try and reduce churn.

° NFSP would be involved to ensure it is done the best way
for the network.

. Focus was on customers. Want to ensure customer service
is improved and to protect the PO brand.

° PO want to intervene early to reduce losses and make it
easier to deal with situations. Previously it had been left too
long and losses were in some cases very large. Prevention
was better than cure.

° If a spms recognises that the shortage is due to their own
error or used for their own purposes, if they pay it back, they
are less likely to be terminated.

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 8

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

° Pointed out that overnight cash declarations were not (
being done in many cases, or were being done wrong.
Some losses were huge and early intervention could reduce
that.

° Felt it was not the NFSP’s job to educate members on PO
processes. PO needed to get cash holdings for the whole
network sorted out. Could be sub contracted to the NFSP.
if PO in better position there would be more money in the
pot for the whole network.

° Felt that PO should ask offices to reduce holdings, and
needed to find out why a branch was holding too much.

. Contrary view that they the NFSP should never be in a
position to go into a branch and check cash. Believed the
NFSP should encourage all spms to do their cash
declaration so if there is a problem in the office, first thing to
look at is where the loss has occurred, Without regular cash
declarations it makes it difficult to identify when and why.
PO will spend time identifying where a loss had taken place € »
and when. Could be error or a bad member of staff. PO
would identify and down to spm to engage and they are
responsible, Without regular cash declarations it was
almost impossible. NFSP should be encouraging every spm
to do daily cash declarations.

° Felt that many did cash declarations but did them wrong.

° There was a long discussions with feelings running high on
the whole subject.

. Sue Edgar would raise the whole subject during a cash
centre visit shortly, Cash declarations used to be at the end
of the day, but with extended hours it needed to be before
19.00,

e) ATMs
e Major concern. Identifying issues and problems that could
develop in the network, Requested meeting with Wendy
Luczywo. €
° At the end of 2018/early 2019 there was a number of gas .
attacks on ATMs. Significant equipment and property
damage to those attacked. PO losing significant money.
° Impact on the spm. In some cases if badly damaged, BO!
not reinstating the ATM at all. If it was expensive to repair,
BOI were taking it out. Spm is left with damaged premises
and loss of ATM income.
. For those who had taken over a business, the ATM Income
formed part of their business plan.
. Became apparent that BOI have the right under the
contract to decide whether or not to reinstate an ATM. It
would be dependent on cost of replacement, reinstatement
and transactional volumes. .
° Contract with BO! runs out in November 2022. NFSP
believe it is part of BO! going to the PO to force them into a
renegotiated contract.

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 ~ i Page 9
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

° PO and BOI must understand and take account of financial
inclusion.

e POCA only works in a BO! ATM. If a POCA holder needs
cash out of hours they will not be able to access if removed,

° Need to ensure transparency on decision making process
and we are part of the process.

° If BO! decide to withdraw, If they do, what happens to
services and spms? There must be a Plan B.

* Troy Gardner asked to look into possible alternative ATM
providers but the deal will never be as good as the PO one.

. Two offices hit in Thurnscoe converted to Mains in October,
Part of the business plan was the ATM income which was
now gone. Not covered by the income guarantee. The two
offices together do not come up to what was initial salary.
Losing substantial income from both the ATM and retail,
NFSP must push for salary top ups. Some ATMs were being
replaced. Needs to be consistency and some Pressure put
on PO to acknowledge its assurances is addressed within
the ATM sale. Even another brand of ATM will not allow
POCA access.

° Some offices were already struggling to survive. The whole
issue had to be taken up by the NFSP.

e PO had signed a bad agreement with BOI. It was a BO! I
decision and nothing PO could do. There had to be j
something they could do, PO should have a say. PO would
provide a waiver but the income would not be the same.

° When PO accept a new business plan, they were leaving
themselves open to being sued,

° Clarified that spms are not responsible for ATM losses after
an attack, however they would have to claim on their
insurance for any damage to the building so it was
important spms tell their insurance company they have an
ATM.

° Comment made that in Scotland they had to pay rates on
their ATM, so for some it would save money to have it
removed. However, loss of ATMs caused hardship
particularly in rural areas.

° Formal recognition on record for the work being done by
Paul McBain and his team to try and match the rest of the
UK and not pay rates on ATMs.

* Agreement to bank closures was predicated on the
availability of an ATM and that had to be taken into
account.

° Also noted that the rates issue was being contested in
England so it could change.

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 10

© National Federation of SubPostmasters

Mailwork (Tim Boothman)

Agreement reached with PO in relation to mailwork pay.

Around 460 mailwork offices.

PO put a proposition to the NFSP last May.

Currently paid Unified Scale relating to number of postmen,

excess attendance, number of vans, etc. Proposed pay to be

split into three main elements.

Property - calculated at £90 ft? x number of walks to cover

all the overheads

Supervision - number of postmen working at the office and

what spms have to supervise

Mail P739s - currently not paid for P739s. Increasing levels

now take up a lot of time and space.

Based on the current network and overall increase of £1.2m.

Some offices received residuum payment going back to

1999.

6O would be worse off with the changes but would get

compensation. Strong argument that for many years some

were paid more for the same job.

Removal of veto, Where RM want to remove mailwork the

procedure was to write to PO and request it. Steve Utting of

PO would contact the spm and send a form. If removed,

given 3 months’ notice and 18 months compensation. Long

process as spm could appeal on the basis the business was

no longer viable without the mailwork. Final decision

remained with Steve Utting.

Over the years many applications for a closure were refused.

Fear was removal of the veto would allow RM to commence

a closure programme.

Negotiation that instead of the local Delivery Office

Manager making the decision, it would be done centrally

and the NFSP would be involved in the process.

Some sites were operating as just a delivery base. Most of

the sorting was done in the main Delivery Office but

postmen use their facilities. They would have to choose to

opt out of that if a request comes in.

£1.2m was the first pay rise in 9 years. Costs were rising.

NFSP would have to wait and see. Could be RM want to

close them. Will need to be monitored.

NFSP had achieved with MAG a package in pace that is

acceptable for everybody.

Only concern was P739 offices. Signed for and Special

Delivery do not get scanned into Horizon. Appeared all RM

needed to do was to issue those branches with a PDA

(some had them already)...Customers sign the cards and

they are sent in each night to the local Delivery Office but

they do not have the manpower to scan i
EB H est Wit}

Strictly Private & Confidential

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 11
© National Federation of SubPostmasters

Revised terms and conditions had been sent to mailwork
offices, They were office specific so they would know what
they were earning.

Compensation for a closure would be 6 months’ notes with
12 months compensation. If the office wants to keep the
P739 element they would be paid 12 months compensation
minus the P739 element.

There would be closures with the removal of the veto but
not wholesale closures. Decisions would be made centrally
not locally. NFSP would have an input.

Major discussion on the scanning of P739s into Horizon,

3. NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE REPORT
See attached presentation (Appendix B)

Home Phone
See attached presentation (Appendix A)

Good deal.
UK call centre,

The deal applied to a financial year rather than any
nth, eri

ATMs

Long discussion on the current BOI ATM situation,

Council not happy with the fact that BO! had the option to
remove and nothing was in place to replace them.

Major loss of income to affected offices.

Banking

Believed some good news would be announced at
conference.

Forgeries becoming a big issue in Scotland. Note counters
did not pick up forgeries with Scottish notes,

PBNEs

New bags announced last November, Nothing had
happened.

6 weeks ago PO had said it was still in progress,

Will need to be chased. Sue Edgar to check with Cash
Management.

International Driving Permits

.

Some offices doing a lot but forms too small to fit all the
information onto,

PO have raised issues with DVLA and should be put right.
Any issues identified should be notified to lan Park and
Wendy Burke to take up.

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Strictly Private & Confidential

(ACTION

IACTION

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 12

© National Federation of SubPostmasters

REMs

Some offices only had a REM every 2 weeks.

On the sealed PBN bags, notes had to be counted within
5 days. Unless notified within 5 days of deposit, PO would
not try to recover from customer.

If there was a shortage notified in 3-4 day limit is OK. If not
you have to count and report to REM unit if wrong.

Some offices did not check the sealed bags.

Only Santander have the authority. Has to be counted by
third day so bank can notify and claim from customer
within 5 days.

would be retiring after Conference.

NC Facilitator position would be taken by Wendy Burke, so
issues should be notified to her.

hanked the Council for their support and questions

Formal vote of thanks recorded for exceptional service

to the NFSP over many years.

4, NNLs & HARD TO PLACE OFFICES

Report circulated.

On NNLs something had just arisen. Contacted by an office
with an NNL opened over a mile away and had no real
impact financially. However, RM had changed the
collection forward by 15 minutes to accommodate the NNL
and that has impacted their business, Their business
customers cannot make the earlier collection time. This has
not happened before but would be raised at the next
meeting.

RM have to get postmen back to the office by 6pm for the
mail to be sorted overnight and delivered the next day.
Postboxes had to comply and Regulator had to give
permission to change collection times, but postboxes were
different to a post office.

Clear that the situation differed around the country based
on local conditions and decisions.

On hard to place offices, Keith getting spreadsheet of all the
offices that had received a letter in February with the
continuation of the CRP.

The spreadsheet shows if they resigned, were they
continuing, if a PNO identified, etc. Shows monthly where
we are. 405 office to start with changed to about 30 every
month.

Currently and for 3 months about 10% (only 3 or 4) have
progressed to transfer.

Biggest drop off was offices resigning as they did not want
to wait. Difficult to argue against that. Disappointing for
them.

Strictly Private & Confidential

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 13
© National Federation of SubPostmasters

Work Keith had done was formally recognised, 405 people
in a community small business impacted by the situation.
In terms of number of post offices, it was a small number.
We are talking about people who invested and it is their
retirement fund. Need to ensure as few walk away as
possible.

NFSP agreed NT to protect the interests of members,
particularly those who wished to exit the business. CTP and
compensation in place only if a PNO is found. If they decide
to walk away, compensation is forfeited,

NFSP needed to push PO, When pushed they became
more considered. Feeling was that blockages may not be
there much longer.

Peter Hall's assistant George produced a report on seven
cases. Some people who walked away, some hard to place
and some we had helped. NFSP were doing all they could.
Report presented to Minister, who accepted and
understood our points. Need to move forward to help and
support these individuals, Many just wanted to retire,

There were cases where both NFSP and PO had worked
hard using all avenues, to get someone out in the case of
critical or terminal iliness by using a temporary. The illness
had to be formally documented. These cases were never
easy and everyone had to play a part in the solution,

There followed a lengthy discussion on the whole issue of
hard to place offices,

Anyone who was aware of a hard to place office or a case of
terminal illness should notify them to Keith Richards.

5. CONFERENCE 2019

Everything is in place for Conference,

If anyone else wants to attend they can only now attend as
a day delegate.

The CEO talked through the agenda and timings. He said
this would be sent to the Board.

The AGM will take place between 18,00 and 18.30 on the
Sunday.

The key note speech from the Post Office will be given by
Debbie Smith and Al Cameron.

Will be signing the register for Time to Change (Mental
health issue).

Martin Kearsley (PO) will present Banking.

Mark Siviter (PO) will present on Mails.

The Mails Team will do an interactive session.

The Holiday Inn voucher could be used in this session or be
opened up to all members,

Retail Team will present on merchandising and cards and
gifts,

There will be a report from the NC.

Honorary membership will be presented to George
Thomson, lan Park, Jim Nott and Peter Montgomery.

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Strictly Private & Confidential

ACTION

[ACTION

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 4

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

° There will be a Postal Affairs Panel. This will be Amanda .
Jones, Post Office, Nick Landon, Royal Mail, Calum ¢
Greenhow, NFSP, Ann Pardoe, Citizen Advice and a person
from Government. This will be chaired by Roger Darlington,

POAG.
e Gerald Ratner will give a key note speech.
e The CEO would like Robert Clack to attend for this session. ACTION

° One of the outcomes of the Court case was that the Post
Office had become risk adverse. Post Office will be
attending Conference and will cover their designated roles
in Conference, but are not going to be involved in any social
events. They will not be sponsoring any of the events.

° There will be a quiz and a blanket blank evening on the

Sunday.
e Gala Dinner on Monday evening will be a tropical beach
party theme.
°
6. ELECTIONS

Region Directors

There are four Regions where elections are taking place.
Two individuals had come forward for each of the Regions.
Of the eight, three are already serving Board members.

The other five, some of who have never represented

members at a branch or regional level, want to come in as a

Director. Need to provide help and support to those

individuals to ensure that they are fully aware of what their

responsibilities are. As a result Jim Nott, Nilesh Joshi and
the CEO will have telephone interview with them on 27th

March 2019, Based on that will take the elections forward.

e Timescale is that need to put together the nominations
with addresses to ERS. They will send out the ballot papers
to the relevant Regions on 10th April. Need to be returned
by 15th May and the results will be announced at the end of
May. :

° If a candidate is not suitable then they will not go forward. ¢
The Articles of Associate state that if there is only one
candidate then no election is required.

° Legal advice had been sought and followed properly.

° The point and intention of the interviews Is purely to ensure
that prior to anyone coming into the organisation that
person has an idea of what is expected of them and we
provide support and help to them.

° Members of the Board have a legal responsibility to
represent the members. . They must comply with legal
obligations.

° Board members should not promote another organisation.

* There should be no conflict of interests.

. Reported that previously a member of the Executive

Council had passed around to others outside of the Council

minutes of the meetings.

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 " Page 15

© National Federation of SubPostmasters

Any Board member in breach of the contract signed could
be removed from the Board.

Suggested that there should at the beginning of meetings
and put on the agenda a declaration of interest. There
should also be a confidential clause on the agenda.

Strictly Private & Confidential

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

.

° New Chair & Vice Chair

°

* The CEO stated that the current Chair, Nilesh Joshi, had
been and excellent confidant for the CEO and a great
source of advice.

° There were originally three nominations for the position of
Chair. Saj Hussain dropped out as he had been nominated
to be Deputy Mayor, which will lead him to being Mayor of
Woking. The CEO congratulated Saj.

° This left two nominations. These were Sue Edgar and Tim
Boothman.

° Nomination forms were handed out to the Board and
collected.

° The person that came second would become Vice-Chair,

e The result of the ballot for the Chair was Tim Boothman 8
votes and Sue Edgar 5 votes, Resulting in Tim Boothman
becoming Chair and Sue Edgar, Vice Chair.

e The CEO congratulated both.

°

7. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS REPORT

° The Director of Operation’s report had been circulated prior
to the meeting.

e Mails Segregation

° Paul Simmonds updated the Board since the circulation of
his report.

° Taking the average monthly performance before the Team
started and compared to the average of the last three
months. Ist Class Parcels were 90.4% now 94.5%. If you
take into account some amendments that need to be
made would be over 95%. Letter/ Large Letter has moved
from 85.9% to 91.7%. 2nd Class was 92.5% to 94.7%.

° Had a meeting with Julian King from PO regarding not
getting descriptive information on the error types. Julian
stated that they have exhausted all the avenues to get this
information from Royal Mail added.

° The data will show the primary error such as a Ist Class in
2nd Class bag but not the detail on what that parcel was i.e.
Freepost.

° Had met with Nick Landon, Chief Customer Officer, Royal
Mail. He said that Royal Mail are happy to supply the
information. Post Office are happy for the NFSP to go direct
to Nick Landon to ask for his assistance.

e The more information that can be gathered will put us ina
better place to achieve target next year.

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 16

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

° Have identified errors made by certain Mails Centres that
means that when adjustments are made to the figures they
will improve considerably.

. Intend to improve relationships with Mails Centres
nationwide.

° Will be running two sets of books for the next year showing
data we get and another one showing adjustments made
when errors are identified.

e There is not a lot of room for manoeuvre with the Mails
targets. If it can be proved the error was made by Royal
Mail then will question the data.

WEBSITE

° Data is currently being uploaded. Testing of the data will
follow,

° The whole digital project will launch around 19 April 2019.

. Members will get an invite to enter their details.

. Referred back to an email sent to members of the Board
that had Post Offices, asking them to log in and test and
enter some business information. Requested this be done
over the next couple of days.

8. DIRECTOR OF RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL REPORT

° The report had been circulated.

° Had more than doubled the retail requests from the start of
the year compared to last year.

° Support from the Commercial Plus team on the retail side.

° Feedback was published in the circulated report.

e Had been attending new entrant post office training. Sign
up members at these and offer retail visits.

° 100% pass rate on Buy a Post Office.

. EM&F are going to promote the scheme though their
commercial transfer agencies.

° Post Office Legal Team had advised that the NFSP cannot
sign up at the moment with Starling Bank. Need to wait
until the end of March before any banking partner can be
signed up. Yorkshire Bank are also in the equation.

° Now attend every Post Office Field Team meeting.

e A subpostmaster had saved £700 on their insurance by
getting a quote from SMEI.

° Instant quotes are available from an on-line app from Love
Energy.

e Asked if there was any way the Retail Team could quantify

how much money per year the Retail Team puts on to the
bottom line of members’ profits. Responded that a survey
could be conducted by it is not easy to get information.

° Retail updates are sent out on a regular basis.

. Peter Hall will be doing some research later in the year on
post office and retail income.

° Looking at finding an alternative ATM provider.

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 17
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

° The more engagement with members the more the
likelihood is that they will buy into the products and
services the NFSP provides. That will generate an income
for the organisation and reduce reliance on Post Office for
funds,

. Board members need to give both Paul Simmonds and Troy
Gardner all the support they possibly can, particularly when
it comes to Branch and Regionals meetings and to involve
them.

9, NFSP COMMUNICATIONS REPORT

° Report circulated.

. Peter Hall gave a presentation summarising the Members’
Survey, copy attached to these minutes,

° The report had been presented to Post Office and they
described the report as sobering.

° The CEO reported that over the last five years there had
been a number of Communication Directors join and leave
the organisation. -Fortunately Peter was part of the Team
and was able to move up. Now have a Communications
Manager and with the changes of the organisation from a
Trade Union to a Trade Associate are starting to engage
with members far more and having more regional and
branch meetings.

° The results of the survey will be fed into discussions with i
Government decision makers, Post Office and Royal Mail. I

° Sue Edgar congratulated Peter Hall on a great piece of I
work,

° The report was based on perception and what the Network I
was thinking.

e Post Office need to take on board what is being said by the
Network,

° More work will be done with the results, They be split by
region.

° The CEO will be able to draw on the results on the speech
he gives at Conference.

° Working on a version of the slides with commentary that
could be used for government meetings.

° Post Office agree that they have to pay subpostmasters
more for banking transactions,

° An exercise had been conducted on banking and a
qualitatively assessment had been done.

° Peter Hall will put together a set of slides to be used at
regional/ branch meetings. ACTION

° NFSP Forum

. The Moderator’s report had been circulated,

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 ; ~~ Page 18

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

© National Federation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confidential

10. FINANCE REPORT

1. TRUSTEES TO THE BOARD OF BENEVOLENCE REPORT

March 2019

¢
12.
e The CEO made a presentation to both Jim Nott and lan
Park as appreciation for all the work that they had done for
the NFSP.
° Paul McBain gave a vote of thanks to the Chair for the way"
he had conducted the meeting.
Sharon Merryweather —e—_—_—_I
Lynda Willoughby : I

(

Page 19

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 ~
APPENDIX 1

CEO PRESENTATION

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

Ay
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

iZ a6ed 6LOZ YIEW 97 8 STZ

Bunee; pieog

O43 MOYuUeoIn uinje5D

dSAN 84} Aq yaoddns jo suljauy

[EL JUOD EB SJeAlig AjOWIS

610z
YEW 30 SZ

SJ@ISELUJSOGqNS JO UOHeIsp~ > LIOHEN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

I
'
i
1
i
i
I

© Nationés.ederation of SubPostmasters war Strictly Private & Confixeitial

Timeline towards today

* 1999- Prime Minister announces changes to the benefit system
* Automated Credit Transfer (ACT)
* 13mclaimants per week

* 2000- Horizon role out

« 2003-ACT begins
* POCA with 4.1m accounts

.

DWP actively encourage customers towards their banks

.

9m customers lost
Network Urban Reinvention- 2500 Post Office close

*

.

NFSP negotiated compensation package - 28 months

nnn nfse.org.uk

The woice of the
UK's past offices

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019 Page 22
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

sz eBed G1OZ UWE 928 SZ Suneew pieog

sea1yo sod Syury

: aun Jo saHON

Apisqns jenuue wogiz -

aiqeis

AjJe}QUeUY S24YO IsO_ BYE OJ PUNY UqL1F +

uonesuediwos syjyuow gz -

SSINSO]D BIYJO 1s0g Asosindus0s OOSZ «
SBUeYD HIOMION ~ L00Z

Ajodouow esol jew jesoy +
Jeyseuws
SIAISS jejsod seBueyo JUBSLULLABAOD - 9007

jee ju0D 9 a1eALg Aly

was siaqseLUysodqns Jouoneipe .uoneN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationéam»ederation of SubPostmasters aod

+ 2010- Horizon Online
+ 2011 - Decision by EC to support NT

.

.

.

£1.34bn funding package

NFSP negotiate the NT contracts
Introduction of Mains/Local models
Roadshows/Branch/Regional/National
agreement from members

FOoG and Mutualisation

+ 2012-NT begins on a voluntary basis

.

*

18 months compensation
Community offices protected

Strictly Private & Confiemntial

The waice of the
UK's post offices

Board Meeting

25 & 26 March 2019

Page 24
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

sz e6eq

6LOZ YEW 97 BST Busey pueog

Seok tod Sry
BUR JO FOION Sar

wr Bucrelsyu nanan

yene

JUOD B SICAL AlIUIS

SNqBIs USINN dS4N
ANOGE 4991JO UOITEIWIUeD 09 ape qUIejdWiOD
SLOZ YUE [1 peiejod uopesusdwes yx qia +
SUIUOW 9Z 03
paseeuou! uolesuediuoes ing Alosinduioa MON: «
Sujpuns ays +
aoual1aju0y
leipeds 9 jeucIBay ‘ysuerg ye al0n SUOQUUDIA) «+
souaiaguoD jerseds ZIN~sloz +

SIBISELUSOGGNS JOUOeIap=E -UOI}EN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationexs»ederation of SubPostmasters

+ 2015-CWU & NFRN present to EC
+ Options of CWU, NFRN & MOU put to
members
+ Members vote overwhelmingly for the
MoU
+ NFSP lose Union status
+ Negotiations on the Grant Fund

Agreement (GFA) begin

Strictly Private & Confiexential

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 26
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

£7 e6eq

6LOZ YOIEW 97 9 SZ Buea, pieog

fene

JUOD 9 BILAL AlN

He [eAoy aBuayeya +
SalSIA [obz + s/e> Suoud OLys +
BOUe][CUWOD Uf asSBaIDU] ay +
WUBa] SEW) +
weal jieiey +
s}efoid syjoads yueuG uy -
Jeak sad Buipuny wig ts +
djysuaquiaui eaiy «
pe][osUe OINe siequuew GBuyysixe jpy +
SO10j OJUI SALLIOA WYD +
WY sByUedLUOD aL Ag pausanoh
UolPloossy apel] & SeLuOzed qS4N +

SISISELUISOGGNS Jo UOMeapSs —_-UOTIEN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationaeeederation of SubPostmasters

+ The

au 2017 to present

NFSP grows jin membership and

representation

8006 members representing 9300 post
offices
Organisation continues to represent the

interests of investor in the network

Apolitical influence increase - APPG set up
Mental Health, Dementia Friendly,
ScamWise, JAM

Benevolent Fund

Care Package for those affected by NNL’s

Strictly Private & Confivewitial

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 28

NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

6z e6eq __ 6LOZ YEW 9Z 9 STZ Sunes, pueog

O00 BOS SyuLy
AI JO BION AL, MEV BuordispuAanan,

cg umn ns Haare tye OG ;
ORs AONE WES MmUR Bumuiodde Sy Mona uRe esIUO3 o onp wopeujiss
HOReie: UF GARY Od ein SeOp Aes wayyy Sseurena Jo S030; wer> Was P UeD ee
» she

[EAL JUu0D g aIeALI AIS 7 SI9ISELUISOdNS Jo UOeape  UONeN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationax»ederation of SubPostmasters er Strictly Private & Confiewntial

Legal precedent set by the Judge in reference to
how the case would judged

Paragraph 60 — Alla court can do is weigh up the evidence before it, observe it being
tested against the other side’s evidence and the documents that are put to a witness,
and come to a conclusion.

mAgAL ‘i The voice of the
arash nisporguk
nanan: NPS pLOrg Ul UK. past officas

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019 Page 30
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

ig aBeq

6LOT YEW 97 9 SZ

Sunsew pieog

SAO sod Suny
SUR IS S108 Sup

dS4AN 84} 0} uonejas ul aBpne ayy Aq suonesnroy F

[EAL JUOD 9 a1eALG Ajois

‘JusuinZOp Jey) Ul paujEUOS

PleMMas PUL YS/I JO BoUB}eg ayy Jo SUIId} UY Sigs

34] Jo sjsasajuy ay] Bunuasaideas gn ay}

#0 BSUaS ay} U Jou AjujeLIE9 puke ASIN ay) pue

8310 180d ay} usaatjag uonenoBbau asqeyoasdde
Aue seo aay} Jey) aouapiiuos ou aaeys “¢

paLiajas

BABY I YOTYM OF [feu a ayy uy ‘suaquaw Ss]

40 SSasa}U] OY} AAOge aininy sy Jo Bujpuns ayy
UE S]S8s9}U] UMO Ss] Ind ‘Jsed ay] Uj ‘sey GSN
84) 28U) Linod ayy) asojaq aouapjaa osje sf asayy “Zz

oBenbuey ysijGuz
34} Uj poojssapun Ayjensn sy} ,,,juapuadaput,,
BAOM SY} EY) ASUdS OY UI “BOILOC ISO¢g at)
#0 Juapuadapuy uonesjueBio uP jou s] DGSAN BYL “LE
965 UdeiBereYy

SISISELUISOGGNS JO UOMesspe uONeN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

Why was the GFA brought in

to the court case?

Paragraph §75 & 595 =

fam entirely disinterested in whether the NFSPdoes, or
does not, supportihe proceedings

+ The Claimants sougtt an order forany document
would show wher that final passage. referring to the GFA,
was added to the website

- refused tomakesich anordey, because this would fave
been an order againstihe NFSP, who are nota party io the
proceedings. t wouldalso have beena distractionio have
hada contested hearing agaist 4 nor-pany

Strictly Private & Confivesttial

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019

Page 32

NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

go aBed

6lOZ UWEW 97 9 SZ

Bunse;, pueog

se yjO BEd su
au Jo S010" Sut

jene

JUOD PB B}EAL AyOWIS

‘oyqnd ape aq pinom v4 ay) Jey}
Papuaius Shem/e ASIN 84i PUE JIC Js0g ay}
(og Jey) aouapiAa ay) Joafas I - ggg UdeIBeIEY

OPIS $,9ILO Js0q ay} UO jseay je ‘sradaey
Aq pajenoBau sem y4o sus - 615 udeiBee4

‘SAN 8Y) YUM (,,.¥4D,) JusWIaaIBY ysomawery
JUBIQ B Ojuy Passjua a2iJQ 1s0g ay] SLOz

Aine LZ UO PUue ASIN AY] PUR A21LLO Is0q ay)
uaemjag peysea sem juawaaibe - 95 udeibeiey

‘WaiD 3Yi 10 Adoo 2 soy payse oym ‘rayeg
wey 41a sue Aq gor Aew z1 - ogg ydeibese4

EL0z wos parep yorym (,.9OW.)
Bujpuejsiapup Jo winpuesoway- 19g udesGeeg

qUsaWaaI6y pung qUeID

S1dISELUISOdGNS Jo UOeIapI

UOHEN @
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationawederation of SubPostmasters ad Strictly Private & Confiewntial

Accusations regarding the NFSP supporting the PO

1. Paragraph 589 - Also, the NFSP’s own website was amended during the trial.

2. Paragraph 594 - That second sentence must have been added to try and bolster
the Post Office's position (adopted during these proceedings) regarding
transparency.

; . a The voice of the
Wane Nisp.org lak UK's post officas

oe?

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 34
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

sg a6ed 6LOZ YEW 9Z 9 Sz Buneey pieog

SO21YO Hod Suny

: FUR JO 330DA aL

‘uonejpaut

JUapuedapUl BIA Od ayy aHuajjeyo oj Aniiqe ay) of

souasajas Aue ayeur of syey Ing Yayo oui jo sued Auer
#0 WON sayelu abpnr — uoneipey te asneiaivgD «

BIO
380ef BY} 0} ASIN OY} Aq pledas $} Jey) ‘,yoeq Pame;o,,
sjues6 Buyaey aoej ng y-4H ey) Jo sual ay} Jo yoRag

Uf {Sy nd Ajuo Jou pinom SIN ayi - ies udeiBeieg -

dSAN ou jo eouepusdepu]

1eAL  jU0D BP aIeAUG AOS SIBISELUISOANS Jo uOHeIspe  UOHEN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

nioeoncrsrans insane aLSCEO

© Nationéesederation of SubPostmasters sa

How to contact us

Evelyn House,

22 Windlesham Gardens,
Shoreham-by-Sea

BN43 SAZ

www.nfsp.org.uk/Contact-NFSP

Strictly Private & Confivewttial

‘inI national-federation-of-subpostmasters

wenn. nisp.org.uk

The voice of the
UK's post offices

seer

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019

Page 36
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

4g e6ed GLOZ YEW 9% 8 SZ Suneew pieog

NOILVINASAUd AALLNAWOD ONILLVLLODSN

@ XIGNaddVv

lent gu0D y eReAuid AAS SuBISLUISOYGNS JO UOHRISpE

2UOHEN ©
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

eg e6ed GLOZ YEW 978 SZ Bunsew pieog

ONVS0VOUs ONY JNOHd JIAIOH
SNYO1 TYNOSH4d
SADVOLYOIWN
SJDNVYNSNI 34
¥O4 SNOILISOdOHd MIN

NOLLWYANNWSY

eau ju0D B axeAG ANOS sisqseUsodqns Jouoneispe  uoeN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationee»ederation of SubPostmasters

Life Insurance Improvements

NEW PROCESS FOR DATA CAPTURE ON HORIZON

1)A Real time feed
There is mow a near to real time feed from Horizon ta Salesforce, creating a usable
lead in seconds.

2) Consistent and easily optimisable comms
All custamer records are stored in Salesforce (linking to brands).

Following a data capture all customers now receive an SMS whilst they are in
branch

Salesforce sends email communication to customers which reflect the products
customers have expressed an interest in. This is currently timed @ Zhaurs after in
store data capture.

Our in house team manage our instances of Salesforce and are able to optimise
communications and jaumeys easily without suppart from an agency

Strictly Private & Confiexential

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019

Page 39
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

Ov a6eq

6LOZ YEW 978 STZ

Ssauppy eury
JOLIN Buoy aGopy Aayspy
saquiny auoydayay = aaysmy

BAH 40 81K

YJOd JO Jaquinu ayiqow Jo aul

“pueI

8 ainjdes ues sayourig ~

S/Psiajes JawoysnD

wou Gurssiwi asam suaquinu
auoyd Jo %Op ‘XY aU] OP JO ~

[l22 @ 0} Buussuos ase

SJ@WO}SND Jey] SuBaW YOIYAA

uoZlOH
O71U! pia Jaquinu auoyd

Buneew pieog

Asoyepuew & paonpowqu aa,anq A

éMaU S,1EUM

JERU — jU0D °B aIeALG ALAS suaqseLuysodqns Jo uoNejepe.  .uoHeN ©
© Nationamederation of SubPostmasters

NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

Strictly Private & Confiewntial oy

What’s new?

¥ We've also added a ‘preferred
time to contact’ field into
Horizon

¥ Which means that we can call
at a time which suits the
customer

Call Back time relating to Life Insurance?

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019

Page 41
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

ty aBed GLOZ YEW 9Z 8 SZ Supjee;, pieog

“‘paunsseey Joujed uolaajosd ayy

dno Aq payaejues vay ajonb aaucunsuj
Opr] B SaAlS901 JOWO}SND ay} asoUM
jEi1Jajai Jawio}sns = s] pea) BuldAyyenb y.

WAL 30NVUNSNG 301430 1S0d JBL AB NDA OL LeONOwA

quEpOduil se payral

SI pes Ausaa yey} aunsus of SUBS RIES

yyepads UoRIajqig & ‘painssesy Aq payoEpuce
pue 9} YBnosy] ues ase speaj soysueg a

ufredwea
Guues s1 Guyseyoig, pH sy} Lieddns a2 gLoZ

Fs) AJENUEP IZ @y) Ue payoune] jjia UoqIsodoud RIL A
INSU] 7H wig

BIA payessusi pes; Gudyyenb sad gy, pred
3g 1M sslpueig Aoueby Jeu s! saeu yraiB ayy r

AQUEINSH
QP] [186 AQUaiuNS UES AaYy JeigeyeA jo ssaypusBas
sadQj youdig Vy Op Uade Ig yim SAE SK 4

ud!jisodolg Ieiajay JdWO sn}

JeAL — JUOD"Z aeALG APOWAS SuaISELUISOGNS Jo uoHeiepIe

‘UOHEN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationewrederation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confiresntial

Potential earnings for your branches
PO expect to convert one in three quotes to sales
Mains will be paid £60 per sale + £5 for the lead
Locals will be paid £35 per sale + £5 for the lead

Detailed sales MI will be available

“Valid leads is @ lead that is willing te receive
quate when our call dentre make contact
with them

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 43
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

477 aed 7 SLOT YEW 9% 8 ST Sunsew pieog

“sUONedyjdde pur Sjelaped U] UOONpe’ @ uae seu aouayadyg
“aunides ejep plea 2 40) juswAed dgz e sem aseys A} feuonippy
“SOUE}MaIo8 JOU JEUO UO paseq sem quaWAEY

“BERRLIOU Syl 4O
ANIEA Bua Jo SEeueoied e uo paseq Ajsnolneid "uoReogdde eSeBow Pyssecons:
© Pediefe 12s Ss0yjo JO) WWeWAed a3e! Je] YO suo B psInpo;u) Od 12h Ise]

SIOVOLYOW

JeBU — JUOD 9B aYeAL APOLAS . SISISELUISOGGNS JO UOHeIEpSs.__.UONeN
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationagpederation of SubPostmasters New Strictly Private & Confixtial

NEW MORTGAGES OFFER
There are four stages for the new structure as follows applying to all branches:

Stage 1 = £5 For capturing customer details on Horizon or CRM tablet, where the
customer meets eligibility criteria [a specialist Post Office team will contact the customer by

Phone at a time of their choosing and assess this} and the lead is then passed to Bank of Ireland

Stage 2 = £20 for the leads in stage 1 that go on to the ‘Fact Find’ stage (where Bank of Ireland
UK ereate a record in their database, prior to completion of the application form,}.

Stage 3 = £125 for any lead above that then generates a mortgage offer from Bank of
ireland UK.

that reach £1m within a financial year (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020),

‘Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 45
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

oy eBed GLOZ YUEW 92 8 Sz Supee; pieog

“{pouiad no Zuyoos Aep pT Jaye ‘youeug ayy Aq paueru
JA1LU09SN9 BY} O} UES] jeuOTEd e iO ass! alt “ai Bs [fssezons quanBasqns & 101 O73 = 7 oSeyS

Jeed
Jad sawojsns Jad Z 01 payuny ‘Jdasoe 10 agueya Jay sy Jo OTs af) yeIger ay LG Pajepdues leap
Jifise1 JSpeyS S24 sansod e Joy pred aq {fim SF “YOLEN Syr Ly Je/qeEs YS & St AIL) = qT eaeyg

Io
“WEIGED IAD Jo UOZLIOR UO seep Jawozsns Suunydes iol dey = et sSeqg
isUsuuded Bunnoyoy Syl Sujesay sayauedg [2 yal SMOOY Se sseo0ud padeys wey us:

“BLO? Alenigeg wieT uo uoHIsodoud ueoy jpuosyed mau 2 peYDUNe! sq Is0g

SUBO] jRUSSISY S510 1s0g

85340 SNVOT TVNOSY3d MSN

[EBL YUOD 9 a2eALd ADIs

SleISeLUIsoOGgNs Jo uoHeIspe _ 2UOTIEN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationaw#ederation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Conflesential

Loans and Mortgages

« Applies to all branches

No variation between Mains & Locals

CRM branches that process loan applications to
successful “quick check” on tablets will be paid an
extra £5.00

Board Meeting

25 & 26 March 2019 Page 47
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

ey e6ed 6lOZ YEW 92 3 SZ Buneew pcos

aduUasald YdUeIq paseaiu]

Suljay1ew paseasauy «

(SsooY? %09) aiq\j uo Jajjo uaBuoNs e pling »
SJBPIAOIG ¢ UleW Jo Isadeayd aq oO] }adKR
SS@UIsng MOIZ OL BuIyoOo] «

pueqpeojig pue sUu0Ud SWOL Od

JENL = Jud B aqeALg AOI SISISELUISOANS JO UOelape uoeN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationexederation of SubPostmasters

Current Commission Structure

Strictly Private & Confiertial

Front Book Mains Locals

New HP Direct 7.50 7.50

New HP Broadband 20.00 20.00

New HP Basic 16.00 10.00

Back Book

New HP Direct 1.00/month 0.50/month

New HP Broadband 2.00/month 1..00/month

New HP Basle 1.00/month 6.50/month
Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 49
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

Os 86eq GLOZ YEW 97 9 SZ Suneew pieog

paplacid qy4 se 3uoj se a4]Uad {je9 elA JO JSUIP aUIBYM
00°0SF JUaWAed jelju! ‘YoUeIq Aue ‘sadAj sajes Iv

yiuow/os'o RUS /o0'T 3ISEg dH Many
yauawu/os'o yuoW/oO'T Walid dH MaN
yoog yoeg

00°0SF o0'0S3 2ISeq dH MeN
o0'os o0'0SF pueqpeolg dH MeN
00'0S3 o0'0s3 WAI dH May
sje907 sulelAy yoog luol4

ET HBOM O] T HOOM
941N}JINAIS UOISSIWIWIOD [e141 pesodoig

lea gU0D e aReALIeI Ajo SJaISELUJSOAGNS Jo uoIe1EpE

2UOeN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationaw»ederation of SubPostmasters 2 Strictly Private & Confiveyntial

Payments Illustration

Based on average life of contract 32 months.

Broadband sale in Mains branch £50.00+ £64.00 = £114
Broadband sale in Locals branch £50,00+ £32.00 = £82.00
Basic phone sale in Mains branch £50.00+ £32.00 = £82.00

Basic phone sale in Locals branch £50,00+ £16.00 = £66.00

Board Meeting

25 & 26 March 2019 Page 51
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

zs e6ed 6LOZ YEW 92 8 SZ Bujeew pieog

jusuelJad apew aq ued sdeyiad [nyssadons 4
[214] e SI aseasoU! Sq sauOYd J0y sjuatAed jeniuy
$]2307 JO} ssaulsng Mau aWOzjafj\

[2207 8 Sule
uaeMJag UO!}IUNSIP INIq 0} Pua} s1aJJo MAU Jo AUeIAj

JUSWILUOD

JEU = JUED B EIeALG ALAS SIB]SELUJSOGQNsS Jo UOelaps uoHeN ©
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

gg o6eq 6LOZ YIIEW 978 SZ

Sunsey preog

AYOLVINOAY 8 WOST
SALLFMIEGISNOdS3au 8 S310"

3 XIGNAddV

FeBL  JU0D 9 eIeALg ARIUS

suayseunsodqns Jo uonejepe

UREN @
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558

(

NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

9g e6ed 6LOZ YEW OZ B SZ

Sunes, pieog

GLOZ ‘Y24eW JO Sz ‘Aepuow

MoyuUsa!D UINjeED

Aiojze/nbay 9 je6a7

eRe ju B aIeAUg ANOLNS

slaqseLUisodqns jo uoneiape

1uoheN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationcxwederation of SubPostmasters Strictly Private & Confieawntial

. Judge Questions Independence

* Judge states NFSP places own Interests
above members

+ BAU work on our website demonstrates
ourintent to bolster PO's position
regarding transparency.

* Questions there was any appreciable
negotiation regarding the NTC.

* Questions the intent of the NFSP or PO
from publishing the GFA.

The voice of the

U's post offices

fsporguk

Board Meeting 25 & 26 March 2019 Page 55
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

9g a6ed

6lOZ Yue 97 9 SZ Bunaew pieog

lene = jU0D 9 a3eALg AjouIS

aoed
felueduirsmoiy +

SHE] 02 UOISSNSsif

jewel
40 JPUI@IU! Sq UBD UOHEIpSal) «

Peysea st assed
J} saqndsip jo uoyeyeosa smojypy +

ig asnelp

JO UOfUaWW OU seyeU ay Wao
Sl) peal pey eGpne auyse yonuisy «

SISISELUSOGqNS JO UOeIap=e -uoHeN ©
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationc,,.ederation of SubPostmasters ea i Strictly Private & Configgential we

internal I External

“« Easy andquickte setup +. Stronger neutrality
« Informal approach + Formal approach
+ Knowledge of organisational structure + Wider experience of organisational conflict
+ Ease of access + Brings fresh eyes to the situation
fie High emphasis on joint meetings : “(+ Better interaction with legal representatives

+ Set upto create a lasting peaceful environment

f r I ib The Waide of the
A ntse.arg.uk UK's post officas

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019 Page 57
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

gs ebed 61OZ YEW 9Z 8 SZ Bunasw pieog

seayO wad Sef
AUR JO S318 Su

Mrrbe'dds JU AA,

ayEyEIS:
‘queOg O} oda! apiAcig: «
sjsaiaquy siequiaw Bupasjoid O39 uM WON +
MOLUBU IDBIUSD & Ye SuogenoGeu JIeNUOD UWA ES4NJo adoog +
SPeQUOI sO}BadO Juaayip Buyjpuejsiapuy +
Od jo juamedag syequog un sdiusuonee: Gujpiing -
Od MUM MAIUeIU] JQEQUOD BYINPUOD OF MOK) «
MAIAIBIUI JBNUOD B10) auedeid 0} MOH «
sauejaines jeuolBey 9 Yyouelg/sio}Ie1g jeuCIBey jo Bumuler, +
SaewoUR JO/pUe $,a9Ua}s[sUud. ‘swayed Joy yosYyD +

SQSED MAAB}U] JOENUCD ae09 +

Ayiqisuodsay AioyejnGoay 9 e697] YM GaN

lene juoD-y aIeAL AOU S1BJSELUISOAQNS JOUCeIEp=s  UoneN So
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

© Nationaw#ederation of SubPostmasters

Post Office

First PO Relationship
Manager or Contracts
Manager

Second PO Network Director
Third CEO of Retail

lf that proves unsuccessful, then
CDER as per the GFA

ee Strictly Private & Confiessntial

Escalation Process

NED for Legal & Regulatory

CEO
NESP Board

we go to the external mediator

Board Meeting 25 &26 March 2019 Page 59
NFSP00000558

NFSP00000558

09 e6ed

6LOZ YEW 97 9SZ Buea pieog

$8910 0d tyy
aU 19 921A Su

SV BUO cS puna

siaqsewijsodqns-jo-uoljeiapay-euoieu @

fee JU0D 9 BIA AjOUIS

dS4N-19eqU0D MN Guerdsyunww

ZYS SYN

Bas-Aq-wBYyooys

‘SuapieD WeUsa/pPUlAA Zz
“asSNoH UAjang PS

SN }2F1U0S 0} MO} 5

SIBISEWUISOYGNS JO UOHeJape -LOHeN ©
NFSP00000558
NFSP00000558