POL00022231 - Email chain between Jonathan Swill, Belinda Crowe, Chris Aujard and others, regarding a letter to Second Sight re quality of work.

Evidence on official site

POL00022231
POL00022231

Message

From: Belinda Crowe [IMCEAEX-
__O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+20CROV
S69F-4526-A078-F5B4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local]

on behalf of Belinda Crowe <IMCEAEX-
__O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+20CRO\V
S69F-4526-A078-FSB4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local> [IMCEAEX-
_O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+20CRO\
569F-4526-A078-F5B4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local]

Sent: 26/08/2014 06:10:24
To: Chris Aujard?
cc: Belinda Crow

Subject: Letter to Second Sight re quality of work
Attachments:140818_POL_Ltr_.docx; ATT00001.htm

Chris

Linklaters have drafted a letter for Second Sight to enable us to begin to take clear steps to control their costs and tackle
poor quality and performance. It is attached.

Chris Day and Paula were (understandably keen to get something on the record about costs. Chris was even minded to
write himself.

I think that we should separate out the Part Two Report from the matter of Second Sight's engagement - however I do
think it gives us the catalyst for making a number of the comments we are making re vfm asl think the fundamental point
is that they've been investigating since May 2012 and said at the MP's meeting in March and the Working Group in

the same month that Part Two would be ready in March yet it arrives in August and is of a very poor quality and does not
appear to be the the product of over two year's investigation.

Despite committing to sending me a proposal for different funding arrangements they have not done so, and said they do
not have a slot available to discuss with me until next week. I have not gone back on this until we agree how to proceed.

Before I do any more work on this I'd be grateful for your views on how you wish to proceed. Importantly, if we say we
are going to take some action we should do so.

I think we should get something to them this week.

POL-0018710
POL00022231
POL00022231

Best wishes

Belinda

parsons!

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this in
error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions
expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD STREET,
LONDON EC1V 9HQ.

Best wishes
Belinda

Belinda Crowe
148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Swil, Jonathan"
Date: 21 August 2014
To: "Belinda Crowe!”
Cc: "Parsons, Andrew?

POL-0018710
POL00022231
POL00022231

Subject: RE: Examples for letter to SS [BD-4A.FID20472253]

Belinda
I attach a revised draft of the letter to Second Sight.
Key changes to note are:

- I have changed the title to their “engagement” rather than referring to the Report, because the former is really what the
letter is about.

- I have inserted an initial paragraph referring to the final report and fact PO will now need to take steps to deal with it.

- I have re-focussed the first main paragraph to, hopefully, be more “punchy” with regard to the key message of this letter-
SS are failing in their role as an independent fact finder and service provider to the Working Group.

- [have inserted most of the examples you and Andrew sent through into places I hope others agree are appropriate.

- I have reworked the 3" point into something more about SS's failure to perform its proper role and the lack of utility and
helpfulness of what they are doing, than about their impartiality/bias.

- I have developed a bit the section on the proposed changes to their billing arrangements.
Do let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss or need any further drafting work from me on the letter.
Kind regards

Jonathan

Any business communication, sent by or on behalf of Linklaters LLP or one of its affiliated firms or other
entities (together "Linklaters"), is confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected. If you receive it in
error please inform us and then delete it immediately from your system. You should not copy it or disclose its
contents to anyone. Please be aware that messages sent to and from Linklaters may be monitored for reasons of
security, to protect our business, and to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory obligations and our internal
policies. Emails are not a secure method of communication, can be intercepted and cannot be guaranteed to be
error free. Anyone who communicates with us by email is taken to understand and accept the above.

Linklaters LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number
0C326345. It is a law firm authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (www.sra.org.uk).
The term partner in relation to Linklaters LLP is used to refer to a member of Linklaters LLP or an employee or
consultant of Linklaters LLP or any of its affiliated firms or entities with equivalent standing and qualifications.
Please refer to www.linklaters.com/regulation for important information on our regulatory position. A list of
Linklaters LLP members together with a list of those non-members who are designated as partners and their
professional qualifications, may be inspected at our registered office, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ and
such persons are either solicitors, registered foreign lawyers or European lawyers.

POL-0018710