POL00022240 - Email from Belinda Crowe to Chris Aujard re: Second Sight Part Two - Introductory Section

Evidence on official site

POL00022240
POL00022240

Message

From: Belinda Crowe [IMCEAEX-
__O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+
20CROWE79B93F 11-5S69F-4526-A078-F5B4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local]

on behalf Belinda Crowe <IMCEAEX-

of _O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+
20CROWE79B93F 11-569F-4526-A078-F5B4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local> [IMCEAEX-
_O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+
20CROWE79B93F 11-569F-4526-A078-F5B4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local]

Sent: 03/09/2014 18:34:45.

To: Chris Aujardi

BCC: Belinda Crow

Subject: — Fwd: Second Sight Part Two - Introductory section  [BD- -4A.FID20472253]

Attachmen _DOC_29319091(1)_Introduction for Part 2 Pack.docx

ts:

Not sure how well you can read this on your iphone and I don't want your detailed comments but please
have a quick scan of the document. Its the intro to POL's response to PartTwo

My view is that its way off beam. We should not be explicitly criticising Second Sight in this way. It
does not assist the resolution of complaints or the credibility of the Scheme or POL.

I think we should limit our comments to the context, the omissions and the out of scope issues. I am at
present losing the battle with the lawyers who seem to think that there is now a need to state publicly
and with confidence just what is wrong with the report and Second Sight's lack of engagement with POL.
To my mind many of the points made here are for a POL to SS conversation.

But before I rewrite the whole lot I wanted to get your views in case I'm off beam here.

Best wishes
Belinda Crowe

Begin forwarded message:

From: Pheasant, Andrew { GRO j
Sent: 02 September 2014
To: Belinda Crowe; Angela Van-Den- Bogerd

Cc: Andy Holt; David Olivers} Rodric Williams; John M Scott; Dave Hulbert; Andy Garner; Paul Inwood; Rod
Ismay; Rob King; Sally Smith; Kim Abbotts; Parsons, Andrew

Subject: Second’ sight Part Two - Introductory section [BD-4A.F1D20472253]

Dear Belinda and Angela (and all),

Please find attached the introductory section to the response for review. This deals with general
position points. Please let me know if you have any comments in relation to this section.

Best regards
Andy

Andrew Pheasant

Associate
for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP

POL-0018719