POL00022664
POL00022664
Message
From:
on behalf of
Sent:
To: Alisdair Cameron
cc: Paula Vennells [7 7
Subject: RE: Sparrow update T TO LITIGATION PRIVILEGE
Attachments: _DOC_33442637(2)_DRAFT Remote Access Rider.docx
Rob Houghton [f
Al
We had a lengthy discussion on this, and all steering committee members felt this was the best outcome. The
sensitivity relates to transparency and whether we could be challenged for under-stating a potential risk. This wording
reflects similar wording used in the previous paragraph in relation to balancing transactions (full text on remote access
attached ~ see para 1.3.4), and needs to be read in conjunction with para 1.4 as well.
The wording is being reviewed by Counsel, and checked with both Deloitte and FJ.
Jane
€ Jane MacLeod
General Counset
‘ound Floor
20 Finsbury Street
LONDON
EC2Y 9AQ
Mobile number:
From: Alisdair Cameron
Sent: 27 July 2016 15:28
To: Rob Houghton
Cc: Jane MacLeod; Paula Vennells
Subject: RE: Sparrow update
Thanks Rob. Jane, are we sure we should add the second and third sentences? Al
From: Rob Houghton
Sent: 27 July 2016 15:22
To: Alisdair Cameron!”
Subject: Sparrow update
Just came out of a meeting with all the legal folk. This is the final wording proposed.
1.1.1 Administer access to databases. Database and server access and edit permission is provided, within
strict controls (including logging user access), to a small, controlled number of specialist Fujitsu (not
Post Office) administrators. As far as we are currently aware, privileged administrator access has not
been used to alter branch transaction data. We are seeking further assurance from Fujitsu on this
point.
POL-0019143
POL00022664
POL00022664
Let me know if you want to discuss.
R
® Rob Houghton
Chief Information Officer
Ground Floor,
POL-0019143