POL00023096
POL00023096
Message
From: Tom Beeze
Sent: 14/03/2019
To: Jane MacLeo:
cc: Andrew Parsons!
Subject: RE: QCs [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Attachments: PO - Recusal.docx
And now attaching the ‘note’ that DCQC prepared for Lord Neuberger, which is referred to in the 'recusai note’. This
attachment is for completeness only and it is not urgent that you digest it right now.
Tt
Tom Beezer
Partner
Wombie Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
: GRO_
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library
Book your place here
“WOMBLE
BOND
DICKINSON
From: Tom Beezer
Sent: 14 March 201!
To: Jane MacLeod \,.
Cc: Andrew Parsons; Amy Prime
Subject: RE: QCs [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Jane
Please see attached “recusai note” from Lord Neuberger.
This has just been received. I arn reading it now.
t
From: Tom Beezer
Sent: 14 March 2019
To: Jane MacLeod (;
Cc: Andrew Parsons;
Subject: QCs
Jane
womblebonddickinson.com
——
POL-0019575
POL00023096
POL00023096
A short e mail to check we are “at one" on forward facing actions. As I see it the running order is as follows:
- We get Neuberger QC recusal comment/advice this eve!
- If'a runner’ we need to decide between Grabiner QC & Mark Howard QC. That decision could be made
tomorrow or early next week. From e mails I sense that you are leaning towards MHQC.
- We then instruct the QC who would "do" the recusal advocacy (assuming they too concur with the Neuberger
view of the world)
- Alongside the above work stream we will also get input from Neuberger QC over Common Issues appeal at
some point next week (I hope. That is the timeframe I'll push for)
- We then take decisions next week (post Neuberger QC advice) over steps in Common Issues appeal (as to
who/when etc).
No reply needed to this unless you have a different view.
T
POL-0019575