POL00023227 - Email chain from Tom Beezer to Jane Macleod ccing Andrew Parsons and Amy Prime re: QCs

Evidence on official site

POL00023227
POL00023227

Message

From: Tom Beezer [tom.beeze!

Sent: 14/03/2019 13:07:38

To: Jane MacLeod (jane.macleodé

cc: Andrew Parsons [andrew.parso!
Subject: RE: QCs [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]

Attachments: 4852_001.pdf

Jane

Please see attached “recusal note" from Lord Neuberger.

This has just been received. I am reading it now.

T

Tom Beezer
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP

Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts

Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library

Book your place here

» WOMBLE
~ BOND
DICKINSON

From: Tom Beezer

Sent: 14 March 2019 11:53

To: Jane MacLeod (jane.macleod
Cc: Andrew Parsons; Amy Prime
Subject: QCs

Jane

womblebonddickinson.com

A ON

)

Ashort e mail to check we are "at one" on forward facing actions. As I see it the running order is as follows:

- We get Neuberger QC recusal comment/advice this eve’

- Ifa runner’ we need to decide between Grabiner QC & Mark Howard QC. That decision could be made
tomorrow or early next week. From e mails I sense that you are leaning towards MHQC.
- We then instruct the QC who would "do" the recusal advocacy (assuming they too concur with the Neuberger

view of the world)

- Alongside the above work stream we will also get input from Neuberger QC over Common Issues appeal at

some point next week (I hope. That is the timeframe I'll push for)

- We then take decisions next week (post Neuberger QC advice) over steps in Common Issues appeal (as to

who/when etc).

POL-0019706
POL00023227
POL00023227

No reply needed to this unless you have a different view.

T

POL-0019706