POL00024869 - Email trail from Thomas P Moran to Jane MacLeod cc: Andrew Parsons re: Letter to Freeths - legally privilege [BD-4A.FID26896945]

Evidence on official site

POL00024869
POL00024869

Message

From: Thomas P Moran [thomas.p.morani,

Sent: 27/11/2016 13:27:01

To: Jane MacLeod [jane.macleod! j

cc: Parsons, Andrew [/o=Exchange-Org/o change Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=ad9ed344815e47e4aaa3c0e7e1740919-Andrew Pars]

Subject: Re: Letter to Freeths - legally privileged [BD-4A.FID26896945]

Ok thanks, sounds sensible.

On Nov 27, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Jane Macleod!, wrote:

My proposal - which I discussed with the team on Friday) was to mention it to GE tomorrow morning
and then circulate the 'remote access’ section to Paula, Al, Mark D and Rob H for any final comments
during tomorrow.

Jane MacLeod
Sent from my iPhone

On 27 Nov 2016, at 11:04, Thomas P Moran i GRO “7 wrote:

Thanks for this, will read it later today.

Jane - what do you think we should do re GE (or a subset thereof) briefing and/or sign
off?

Tom

On Nov 27, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Parsons, Andrew:
wrote:

All

Please find attached a draft Letter to Freeths in response to their last
substantive letter (copy also attached). This incorporates comments
from Tony and Rod.

The majority of this letter addresses legal and procedural points. The
key substantive area is section 9 on Remote Access (in particular, Rob,
I'd be really grateful if you could review this section).

Following feedback from Deloitte, we cannot definitively say that PO (as.
distinct from FJ) never had the ability to change Horizon data because
Deloitte and the current staff at FJ just don't have enough knowledge of
Old Horizon to confirm this. This was a point made in an early draft but it
has now been removed.

We have (I hope) now found a formulation of words that avoids having to
overtly throw FJ to the wolves and avoids any risk of waiving privilege in
any documents, but still gives us a fair story to tell. We have also toned
down the admissions of making incorrect statements, though they are
still there. I hope this might make it easier to get this letter cleared
through GE and Fu.

We have a call scheduled for 5pm tomorrow with Tony which we can use
to run through any comments. Comments by email before then are also
welcomed.

POL-0021348
POL00024869
POL00024869

The final version of the letter will be thoroughly proof read before sending
so please ignore any typos.

Kind regards
Andy

Andrew Parsons
Partner

Bond Dickinson LLP.

<imagec819cf.PNG> <image3388e3.PNG>
www.bonddickinson.com

Bond Dic LY is authorised and

<Letter of Response.pdf>

<_DOC_34430591(1)_ Response to Letter of Reply_ 27 November
2016.DOCX>

Po De

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named
recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you
have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system.
Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically
stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: Finsbury Dials,
20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.

POL-0021348
POL00024869
POL00024869

POL-0021348