POL00028587
POL00028587
e
@3 APR ’98 14:28 FROM
P.61/8?
SS WE Aw
To: Dave Miller A
Fax Number: « A
Telephone Number:
From: Matt Taylor
. Horizon Programme
Post Office Counters Ltd...
Address: Horizon Programme
Post Office Counters Limited
Third Level
Terminal House
52 Grosvenor Gardens
London SW1W 0AB
Date: 3rd April 1998
Time: 14.55
Number of Pages: 7 including cover sheet
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL
This fax transmission and any accompanying documents may contain information belonging to the sender which
{s confidentiol and Iegally privileged, This information is ineended only for the use of the individual or entity to
03/04 '98 14:14 TX/RX NO. 0444
POL
POL00028587
POL00028587
EMR Issues Log
P02
Development Lack of access to, and verification and validation I John =
of the application design results in risk to Meagher Austin/ S$
solution conformation requirements. MJBC
2. Status of EPOSS issues, John Terry 30 April FMR $
: Meagher Austin 1998
3. Accounting and Reconciliation issues Le. John Terry 30 April FMR 2
- BES fallback transactions Meagher I Austin 1998 E
~__Accounting/ reconciliation reporting,
4. RCD not signed off, John Martyn 30 April FMR
Meagher Hughes __I 1998 s
5. Status of Reference Data end to end work and John Terry 30 April FMR =
impact on development and tesling. Meagher Austin 1998 es
6. Concems over PPDs not being ready on time and John Terry 30 April FMR 2
not being of sufficient quality. Meagher Austin 1998
7. Lack of visibility of the design for how reference Jobn Terry 30 April Checkpoint §
data drives the applications (i.e, BOSS), Meagher Austin 1998 °
8. Mitigation of ICL Pathway’s dependency on Dave Miller I John 30 April Issue not
Escher. : Bennett — I 1998 accepted by
Pathway
9. Awaiting ICL Pathway’s proposal for Gareth MJBC/MB I 30 April Owners
mechanism to inform (re: location and role of Lewis ‘1998 Meet
sites with remote access to central services,
B 10. Proof of concept development (e.g, soft EVP). I John Terry 30 April Checkpoint
Meagher Austin 1998
8 11. What is the status of Y2k compliance of CAPS, Paul Dyson I Terry 30 April Owners
3 FBS and POCL systems . Austin 1998 Meet
R 12. Clarity and visibility of FRMS including Gareth Terry I 30 April Checkpoint
é development plan, . Lewis Austin 1998
8
® Fmrqandiissuclog.doc Page
a Version 1.0 2 April 1998
POL00028587
POL00028587
EMR Issues Log
PO3
:
oo “1 * ot. .)
13, DIT progress (PDA testing and Pathway are Simon Rilot z
. jointly obtaining a series of statements from the 3
i projects involved which states their position for .
going into DIT2 - this work should be available Chatten S
for the FMR meeting,). 3
14, Progress of system test, particularly BPOSS. Simon Rilot I Terry 30 April FMR
Austin/ 1998 a
Graham
Chatten —
15, Confirm CAPS’s commitment to E2E testing Simon Rilot ‘Terry 30 April Workshop %
.. Austin 1998 =
16. Viability of test schedule in light of current Simon Rilot I Terry 30 April IMR as
difficulties, Austin/ 1998 a
. Graham. oI
Chatten S$
17. Scope of EPOSS testing is inadequate to provide I John Terry 30 April Workshop s
assurance, Meagher Austin 1998
18. Horizon product assurance are not confident that John Terry 30 April Workshop
test prep review comments are being addressed Meagher Austin 1998
thereby risking the successful completion of
‘testing.
19. Horizon product assurance require more clarity, [John Terry 30 April Owners
B and understanding of 34 party testing. Meagher Austin 1998 Meet
20. CAPS are concerned that there seems to be Simon Rilot I Terzy 30 April Workshop
a limited opportunity for volume and stress testing Austin 1998 .
7 21. Has the approach for joint testing been Simon Rilot I Terry 30 April Checkpoint I
g successfully implemented, Austin 1998 t I
a
&
3 ‘
® Fmrqandiissuelog.doc Page 2
Version 1.0 2 April 1998
POL00028587
POL00028587
@3 APR °S8 14:38 FROM
EMR Issues Log
prdach: ‘3
22. Testing seems to be fragmented and itis not clear John Workshop
how all the testing components add up to full Meagher Austin 1998
coverage and depth,
23, When do POCL feel that that the B2B procedures I Min Burdett I Graham 30 April Owners
walkthrough should commence? Chatten 1998 Meet
24, What is the state of readiness of the CAPS Simon Rilot I Terry 30 April FMR
system and its feeder systems for Austin 1998
a) E2QE
b) MO
¢)_ Supporting 2-4 benefit
3. Acceptance 25. Format of acceptance Specifications not yet Mary Reade I John Dicks I 30 April Workshop
agreed, 1998
26, Pathway solutions need updating (i.e. CCN 234 Mary Reade I John Dicks [30 April Owners meet
does not cover alll areas). 1998
27, Status of contractual controlled documents, Mary Reade I John Dicks I 30 April Workshop
1998
28. Overloading of Pathway acceptance manager. Mary Reade I John Dicks I 30 April Owners
1998 Meet
29. Pathway no longer wish to use MOT and B2E Mary Reade I John Dicks [30 April Workshop
platforms for acceptance, therefore can all the 1998
infrastructure trialling be completed?
"I 30. Concern that acceptance specifications may not I Mary Reade I John Dicks I 30 April Workshop
be agreed before the mid-point of BIT, DIT etc, 1998
an therefore necessitating the rerunning of these
stages.
@ Fmrqandiissuelog.doc Page3
Version 1.0 2 April 1998
P04
0444
TX/RX NO.
03/04 '98 14:14
POL00028587
POL00028587
5
@3 APR ’°98 14:31 FROM
EMR Issues Log
i
POS
31. Concer over the viability of acceptance plans. I Mary Reade I John Dicks I 30 April FMR (for =
- Concern that back loading of acceptance 1998 back loading =
tests into Live Trial will delay NRO due to issue) and I
volumes of tests involved « Workshop s
- Concern over the challenging timescales for others iv
available for completing acceptance testing. . a
- Concern over the lack of available a
contingency :
- Concern over on the large resource
requirements in order to meet the timescales, bs}
Is this fully planned for and is the demand on s
resources understood? ia
32. Assumption that reviews will be completed in1 { Mary Reade I John Dicks I 30 April Workshop 3
pass and at] meeting. 1998 -
33. Are there any issues relating to acceptance Mary Reade I John Dicks I 30 April Owners <
planning, scripting or process with which 1998 Meet 3
Horizon fundamentally disagrees, If so Pathway
need to be made aware of the details
immediately.
34. Acceptance plans not yet agreed including: Mary Reade I John Dicks [30 April FMR
- Acceptance in Live Trial 1998
-__ Acceptance in parallel to Live Trial
4, Migration 35. The Te-2 strategy has not yet been signed off. Bruce Terry 30 April FMR
McNiven Austin 1998
36. A detailed Jc-2 migration plan has not yetbeen I Bruce Terry 30 April FMR }
I___ published. McNiven Austin 1998 I
37. 1c-2 Dual data centre planning. Bruce Terry 30 April Workshop
McNiven Austin 1998
38, What are the issues surrounding the counter Bruce Terry 30 April PMR
migration activities? MeNiven Austin 1998
@ Fmrqandiissuelog.doc Page4
Version 1.0 2 April 1998
0
POL00028587
POL00028587
a
@3 APR ’S8 14:31 FROM
EMR Issues Log
. Progress by both POCLand Pathway for theIn I Bruce Terry 30 April Checkpoint
office migration strategy is very, slow withno I McNiven Austin 1998
agreement in sight,
40. Pathway have not given any dates on the Bruce ‘Terry 30 April Workshop
development time for the in-office migration McNiven — I Austin 1998
activity and so the impact on § October is
difficult to determine.
5. Implementatio I 41. Concerns over ICL Pathway’s ability to achieve _I Bruce MJBC 30 April Checkpoint
n and maintain a 300 beat rate. McNiven 1998
42. Agreement on competency and turnover Bruce MyBC 30 April Workshop
training. coe McNiven 1998
43. Impact of commercial issues on Progress. Bruce MJBC 30 April Owners
McNiven 1998 Meet
44. User guides/ training material dependent on Brace MJBC 30 April Workshop
clarity of PPDs and apreed production process McNiven 1998
45, Delay to signing off strategies prevents detailed I Bruce MJBC 30 April RMR
planning work being completed: McNiven 1998
- Rollout strategy
- Split Infrastructure/Installation strategy,
6. Live Trial 46. When will Horizon be ina position to provide I John Martyn 30 April Owners
confirmation of RAB process, its relationship Murray Huhges 1998 Meet
.. with acceptance and NRO?
47. The Live Trial approach has not yet been agreed, I John Martyn 30 April FMR
: Murray Hughes 1998
7, I Fallback and ~~ I48, Fallback and contingency plans require detailed I Mitchell Mike 30 April FMR
contingency confirmation, Leimon Coombs 1998
planning :
8. Future 49. Commercial issues arising at NR2+ duc to the Dave Miller I Mike 30 April Owners
Releases 4,000 outlet and proof of concept problems, Coombs 1998 Meet
@ Fmrgandiissuelog.doc Page5
Version 1.0 2 April 1998
0
P06
0444
TX/RX NO.
03/04 'S8 14:14
POL00028587
POL00028587 _
g
EMR Issues Log : 5
8 a
5 2
“ 50, Much more information on Horizon Light is Jeremy Peter Jeram Owners z =
required as POCL need to decide the impacton I Folkes 1998 Meet 3S
NRO (cither with or without Horizon Light .
occurring), 2
9. I Service Si. Have the lessons learnt from supporting Icbeen I Graham Martyn 30 April FMR ig
Support applied to NR2 and factored into Plans? (i.e, Beck Hughes 1998 . S
interface activity)? . B
10. "I General 52. Key Handshakes ~ there are a number of Key I Min Burdett IGraham I 30 April Handshake
Handshakes milestones which require input Chatten 1998 Process
from Horizon (see attached for details). Horizon a
need to ensure that the issues which are <
preventing progress on these items are cleared or °
made known to Pathway. Many of the items =
relate to implementation Handshakes? *
53. What is the state of readiness of POCL for: Min Burdett I Martyn 30 April FMR s
- E2B testing definition (co- Hughes 1998 o
- User guides production ordinates
— Definition of MOR/MOT ALL)
- POCL Help desk
~ Processes/procedures for the on-going
update of Ref Data
54, Do POCL have the appropriate level of Min Burdett I Martyn 30 April FMR
B skilled / experience resources to undertake the (co- Hughes 1998
activities they need to complete to make the ordinates
8 Programune a success (i.e. acceptance script ALL)
3 reviewers, E2E definition, process/ procedures
ns analysis and documentation
oo
a
&
8
@ Fmrqandiissuelog.doc Page 6
Version 1.0 2 April 1998
oO