POL00043001 - Email Chain from Shikha Hornsey to Rodric Williams, Ben Foat, Gary Walker and Others, Re Horizon Issues Trial Disclosure

Evidence on official site

POL00043001
POL00043001

Message

From: Shikha Hornsey [Shikha.Hornsey,

Sent: 02/10/2019 21:35:19

To: Rodric Williams [rodric.william: en Foat [Ben.Foat _4; Gary Walker
[gary.walkeri__. herrill Taggart (Sherrill. Taggart. ']; Kenneth Garvey
{Kenneth.Garvey, :

ce: Andrew Pa I; Watts, Alan
[Alan.Watt: Emanuel, Catherine [Catherine.Emanuel

Subject: Re: IMPORTAI ‘on Issues Trial Disclosure - PRIVILEGED & NTIAL - DO NOT FORWARD

Rod,

I'm OK with what's been stated.

Regards,

Shikha

Shikha B. Hornsey
Group ClO

Ground Floor
Finsbury Dials
20 Finsbury Street
London EC2Y 9AQ

>; Gary Walker

Cc: andrew.parsons <andrew.parsons_ GRO ; Amy Prime <amy.prime,
<Alan.Watts. Emanuel, Catherine <Catherine.Emanuel }
Subject: IMPORTANT - Horizon Issues Trial Disclosure - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT FORWARD.

Watts, Alan

Ben — I set out below an overview of a significant development in the GLO. Given this involves Fujitsu, I am also sending
this to Shikha (whom I have also briefed verbally) and Gary Walker from IT, and Sherrill and Ken from Legal (WBD and
HSF are cc’ed).

issue

- Post Office appears to have provided disclosure of “Known Error Log” entries (KELs) for the Horizon Issues trial
on an incorrect basis.
The KELs were key documents in the trial as they documented for helpline staff known issues in Horizon with
workarounds and fixes.

- Fujitsu had informed us that KELs were overwritten when updated, such that no previous versions were kept
and only current versions could be disclosed.

- This was communicated to the Claimants in an Electronic Disclosure Questionnaire (EDQ) in December 2017, and
disclosure was given on that basis.

- Fujitsu told us yesterday that previous versions of KELs do exist (the scale of which is being confirmed), such that
the scope of disclosure as represented and provided was wrong.

POL-0039483
POL00043001
POL00043001

Risk & Mitigation

- Post Office needs to notify the Claimants of the extra KELs urgently (a more detailed explanation can follow).

- We can assume they will then bring this to the attention of the Managing Judge as part of their overarching
criticism of Post Office’s disclosure.

- In addition to the damage to our creditability, the worst outcome could be that the Judge seeks further evidence
from the experts as to whether previous KEL versions would have affected their evidence.

- Post Office should however explain to the Claimants that the fault for this lies with Fujitsu and the incorrect
information they supplied to us.

- We have a conference with Leading Counsel from the Horizon Trial Tony Robinson QC at 430pm today to
consider what else needs to be done (e.g. do we need/want to go direct to the Court with this).

input Required
- Given the wider commercial relationship with Fujitsu, the lawyers need to know how hard we can lay blame

with Fujitsu.
- The draft letter to the Claimants notifying them of the position currently says:

“.... we have made further enquires with Fujitsu to confirm that previous versions of the KELs that have
already been disclosed are no longer held. As you aware, Post Office's EDQ (which was based on
information provided by FJ) stated that "t]he KEL only contains the current database entries and is
constantly updated and so the current version will not necessarily reflect the version that was in place at
the relevant time. The previous entries / versions of the current entries are no longer available". We
were however informed by Fujitsu yesterday morning that this position may be incorrect and that
previous versions of the KELs may be available. Post Office relied on the information provided by Fujitsu
at the time of filing its EDQ that such documents were not available and urgent investigations are
ongoing to understand the extent to which previous versions of the KELs are held by Fujitsu.

-  Shikha/Gary ~ are you happy with this (bearing in mind a more detailed explanation is likely to be required in
due course)?

_. if you would like to discuss.

GRO

Vm at my desk or on my phon .
Thanks, Rod

Rodric Williams

Head of Legal - Dispute Resolution & Brand
20 Finsbury Street

London EC2Y 9AQ

RA ff RR Rf fF RR 428 28 R28 A ff KR 2 a 8 2 a

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named
recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you
have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system.
Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically
stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: Finsbury Dials,
20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.

SReRIO IC OF RR RSI ICCC RoR RF ICCC aR OR oR OR FCC ROR oR OR C1 OR OR OR RCC 0 OR OR FCC

“Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy. Information about how we do this can be found
on our website at ww toffi i y”

POL-0039483