POL00045010
POL00045010
POST OFFICE LIMITED v SEEMA MISRA
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
1 “FOR THAT YOU Seema Misra between the 15” day of November 2006 and the 14°
day of January 2008 at West Byfleet Post Office stole £74,609.84 belonging to Post
Office Limited’.
(Contrary to Section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968)
2 "FOR THAT YOU Seema Misra between the 15" day of November 2006 and the 14”
day of December 2006 at West Byfleet Post Office dishonestly with a view to gain for
yourself falsified an account required for an accounting purpose namely the Monthly
Trading Statement for West Byfleet Post Office dated 14" December 2006 by making
an entry therein purporting to show that the cash in hand at the close of business that
day was £19,704.06 when it was not".
(Contrary to Section 17(1) of the Theft Act 1968)
3 “FOR THAT YOU Seema Misra between the 16" day of May 2007 and the 16” day of
June 2007 at West Byfleet Post Office dishonestly with a view to gain for yourself
falsified an account required for an accounting purpose namely the Monthly Trading
Statement for West Byfleet Post Office dated 16” June 2007 by making an entry therein
purporting to show that the cash in hand at the close of business that day was
£30,604.60 when it was not".
(Contrary to Section 17(1) of the Theft Act 1968)
4 “FOR THAT YOU Seema Misra between the 14" day of November 2007 and the 15"
day of December 2007 at West Byfleet Post Office dishonestly with a view to gain for
yourself falsified an account required for an accounting purpose namely the Monthly
Trading Statement for West Byfleet Post Office dated 15" December 2007 by making
an entry therein purporting to show that the cash in hand at the close of business that
day was £39,135.73 when it was not".
(Contrary to Section 17(1) of the Theft Act 1968)
5 “FOR THAT YOU Seema Misra on the 9" day of January 2008 at West Byfleet Post
Office dishonestly with a view to gain for yourself falsified an account required for an
accounting purpose namely Cash Declaration for West Byfleet Post Office dated
9" January 2008 by making an entry therein purporting to show that the cash in hand
that day was £14,000 when it was not".
(Contrary to Section 17(1) of the Theft Act 1968)
mAoriminal work folders\singh jarail crm\258932 - misra\258932c.doc