Page I of 1
Richard Jory
T juliet. mcfarlane@
Subject: Re: Hamilton
duliet/Jenee
Counsel defending has offered pleas to false accounting in this matter {I presume counts 2-9 inclusive] and
asked me to take instructions as to whether this might be an appropriate offer. My view is that there is
evidence she has taken the money, and that there is sufficient ‘evidence to support theft, but Royal Mail may
be content with guilty pleas to dishonesty matters if she undertook to repay the amount of the shortage at
audit, ie £36,644.89. It might be worth speaking to the officers, Graham Brander and Colin Price, to canvass
their views.
Regards
Richard
BELU YARD
Disclaimer. This communication, together with any attachments transmitted with it (this Email) is
POL00049069
POL00049069
intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
If the reader of this Email is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any use of this Email is prohibited.
Addresses should check this Email for viruses. 9-12 Bell ‘Yard make no representations as regards
the absence of viruses in this Email. If you have received this Email in error please notify us
immediately, and then destroy this Email and any copies of it.
02/10/2007