POL00052178 - Peter Holmes Case Study: Defence Statement for Peter Holmes responding to charge of “theft from employer”

Evidence on official site

POL00052178
POL00052178

DEFENCE STATEMENT

(CPIA 1996 s5(5))

To the Prosecutor: Royal Mail legal Services, 3° Floor, 6a Eccleston Street, London,
SWIW 9LT

To the Court: Newcastle Crown Court DX 65127 Newcastle 2
Name of Accused: — Peter Holmes.

URN:

Charge: Theft from employer,

Date of next hearing: 17 August 2009

Name and address of McKeag and Co
solicitors for the accused: 1-3 Lansdowne Terrace,
Gosforth,

Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 IHN

Date: 16 July 2009

I. The nature of the accused’s defence is: As stated in my interview under caution with
representatives of Royal Mail I did not steal any monies from Jesmond Post Office. I
believe that either the Horizon system has on occasion been at fault and ultimately
created the shortfall by creating incorrect entries. The monies entering the joint Barclays
Account are proceeds from my wife’s business.

I do accept that I did falsify documents to cover the discrepancies but this was only
because I thought error notices would be generated and that the money was not actually
missing.

2. The accused takes issue with the prosecution in relation to the following matters: I do not
believe that the Royal Mail has conducted a thorough investigation and did not consider
any alternative in relation to the allegation.

3. The accused takes issue with the prosecution about these matters for the following
reasons: no other member of staff has been investigated. I have put forward a full
explanation of the money passing through my joint Barclays Account.

POL00052178
POL00052178

4. The accused requests the disclosure of the following material as it might undermine the
Prosecution case or might be reasonably expected to assist the defence disclosed by this

written statement:

No. of item
(if listed on Date
schedule)

Description

Reason for request

File No: 01H20932/1

UFN No. 090309/003