We always seek to improve our services to our clients Page 1 of 2
Rachael Panter
From: Sarah Porter
Sent: 04 September 2012 14:24
To: Cyndi Kenny; Rachael Panter; martin smith
‘Subject: 024676CRI05Z-SP52012090411043056
Crown Court Attendance
Rv. Royal Mail Group CK Case No(s): 24676
Judge: HHJ Rose Date of Hearing: 4" Sept 12
Prosecution Counsel: SP Staff attending:
Defence Counsel: Georgina Coade Type of hearing: PCMH
TIMES and NOTES:
Preparation before leaving: (planning meeting, papers read ele)
Conferences:
fica Gates jay tlre
ravel
Mileage, parking, fares: £
“Target Time: (FROM start prep before leaving TO return) units I Total units:
a fa/i?
RECORD: Advice given / Important instructions received / Comments
Summary of Hearing / Directions made / Actions required. q/L [it
NG plea
W's as per letter encl DS ~ Liaquat, Smith, Bradshaw,
Def to instruct a forensic a/c and therefore need data covering the operational period o
indictment. Court has directed that this be served by 5" October. Def to serve expert re
13"" Nov. Prosec response and opening note/case summary by 2™ Jan 13. 1/V to be su
by 11" Jan 13,
A trial has been fixed for 25" Feb 13 t/e 3 days. 7 days liberty to apply to move if W's t
did not have Febs DTAs
We always seek to improve our services to our clients Page 2 of 2
Thave made it clear that our stance is thal Horizon works and is irrelevant in this case because
he now accepts making the reversals und we say in doing this he was acting dishonestly to cover
his tracks. Any particular problems with the system must be fully particularised before any
further disclosure made. Judge has indicated that the ball is in the defs Court.
Can we get a log of any calls def may have made to the helpline?
Re: specific requests
(i) only such material as undermines our case or assists the def in light of the DS should
bbe served.
(i, (ii) Gv) (v) [understand that the Post Office are compiling some sort of database in
relation to this, can the progress of this be checked - but until DS further particularised does
not require disclosure. See HB's advice in Wylie (case ref:21392),
(vi) as above
(vii) Bradshaw can deal with this
(viii) Not necessary to comply but could serve as matter of courtes}
Other cases in court attended on same day:
Tek empinesSV CRN CRIT
POL00058277
POL00058277