POL00061744
POL00061744
Message
From: Belinda Crowe [IMCEAEX-
_O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+20CROWE79E
S69F-4526-A078-F5B4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local]
on Belinda Crowe <IMCEAEX-
behalf _O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+20CROWE79E
of S69F-4526-A078-FSB4958A8917220@C72A47.ingest.local> [IMCEAEX-
_O=MMS_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=BELINDA+20CROWE79E
569F-4526-A078-F5B4958A8917220@C72A47 ingest.local]
Sent: 01/09/2014 07:5:
To: Parsons, Andrew
CC: Belinda Crowe [~
Subject:RE: Email retreival
I; Rodric Williams
Great, thanks Andy
Best wishes
Belinda
Belinda Crowe
148 Ol
GRO
From: Parsons, Andrew :
Sent: 01 September 2014
To: Belinda Crowe; Rodric Williams
Subject: RE: Email retreival [BD-4A.FID25887215]
A signature only makes a difference if the Statement is filed with a Court (at which point any false comment in the
Statement would be a contempt of Court). I'd be minded to keep the Statement unsigned as it helps us to maintain that it
is a draft document and therefore potentially subject to legal privilege (for DPA and FOIA purposes).
Kind regards
Andy
Andrew Parsons
Senior Associate
for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP
www.bonddickinson.com
POL-0058223
From: Belinda Crowe!
Sent: 01 September 2014 68:01
To: Parsons, Andrew; Rodric Williams
Cc: Belinda Crowe
Subject: RE: Email retreival [BD-4A.FID20472253]
POL00061744
POL00061744
{think we just send the email to them and make them come back with the question they want answering and then deal
with that what we were trying to do with the email is to make the point that they cannot have source material such as
this as its totally inappropriate and also get them to ask the question which we can answer on the record.
A further question from me, is it worth getting that witness staternent signed?
Best wishes
Belinda
Belinda Crowe
148 Old S
LONDON, EC1V 9HO,
belinda.crowe
From: Parsons, Andrew _
Sent: 01 September 2014 07:27
To: Belinda Crowe; Rodric Williams
Subject: RE: Email retreival [BD-4A.FID20472253]
Yes - we have addressed the issue under investigation by SS. This was about Mr Rudkin's visit to FU's office at Bracknell
and the “covert operations centre” he apparently saw. To dispel this rumour, we have provided SS with a statement from
Martin Ralfe (POL employee who conducted the visit) confirming that the “operations centre” was in fact a test
environment, not connected to the live Horizon system. This was Spot Review 5.
Unless lan is saying that Post Office are trying to conduct a massive conspiracy against SPMRs, then the trawi for emails
is clearly disproportionate.
A
Andrew Parsons
Senior Associate
for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP
POL-0058223
POL00061744
POL00061744
To: Rodric Williams; Parsons, Andrew
Subject: RE: Email retreival
Apparently not.
Belinda Crowe
148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ.
belinda.crowe!
From: Rodric Williams
Sent: 29 August 2014 14:54
To: ‘Parsons, Andrew'
Cc: Belinda Crowe
Subject: FW: Email retreival
Haven't we addressed this already through the Spot Review?
From: Belinda Crowe
Sent: 27 August 2014 08:17
To: Chris Aujard
Cc: Belinda Crowe; Rodric Williams; Parsons, Andrew
David Oliver!
Subject: FW: Email retreival
Angela Van-Den-Bogerd;
Chris, Ian was chasing about the matter of retrieving emails for POL staff in relation to the matter of whether there is a
basement in Bracknell from where POL staff can manipulate branch Horizon data without the knowledge of spmrs. This
was drafted for you to send when Ian first raised the matter but I don’t think you ever sent it. Ian raised it again in your
absence. Are you content for me to send this on your behalf?
Tan
You raised this matter with Belinda in my absence, I apologise I had thought we had responded on this.
For me the starting point in considering your request is to understand why you feel you need access to this information.
The processes established by the Working Group are fairly clear: upon receipt of a CQR POL produces a report (along
with relevant supporting documentation) which is then sent to you for the purpose, inter alia, of providing a basis upon
which you can prepare a corresponding report for the Working Group. To the extent that you reasonably feel there are
ambiguities or omissions in the POL report you have the option of either commenting on this matter in your report (to the
extent it is not material), or (to the extent that it is material) requesting, via appropriate channels (and at all times copying
in Angela), clarification of issues raised. The point here is that such requests are specific and focussed on matters directly
relevant to the report produced by POL; they should therefore be made afier receipt of the POL reports, not before they
are written, not be overly general in nature, and certainly not so broad as to require the release of an entire class of
document, e.g. an entire inbox for POL employees. Put another way, it seems to me that the Working Group has not
asked you to conduct a trawl of the primary source documentation and records maintained by POL to ascertain what it
POL-0058223
POL00061744
POL00061744
relevant, and what is not. Apart from the need to maintain an orderly and workable process, there are it seems to me very
good reasons to ensure that we maintain discipline and focus on the cases at hand.
The current situation contrasts quite markedly to that which prevailed in the period prior to the release of your interim
report, when you were undertaking what was essentially an investigatory exercise. Given your role then, I can entirely
understand why generic information was provided to you as it no doubt formed the factual basis by reference to which
you wrote your report. However, the focus of your work now is on the mediation scheme, where your role is significantly
different from that which you occupied in respect of the interim report, and as such I cannot see any compelling rationale
for disclosure. Indeed, to retrieve files, documents and emails, review them and redact information which is commercially
confidential, privileged or personal would involve considerable time and resource, which I would find difficult to justify
without a clear need.
If you would like to let Angela know the actual question you are seeking to answer, we will endeavour to provide you
with the answer.
Regards
Chris
Belinda Crowe
, <mediationg
I'd be grateful for a response to my 13 March email (attached)?
Many thanks
With best wishes
Ian R Henderson CCE CISA FCA
Advanced Forensics - London, UK
Forensic computing expert witness and electronic disclosure specialist
UK Mobile:
Email: irhi
Website: http://advancedforensic
Linkedin: http://linkedin.coms
Twitter: http://twitter.coms
POL-0058223
POL00061744
POL00061744
CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at ir
delete the email and any attachments.
Sent: 13 March 2014
To: ‘Belinda Crowe’
Cc: ‘Angela Van-Den-Bogerd'; mediati
Subject: FW: Email retreival
Belinda
This is a long outstanding request that was left with Andy Holt. (Full email archives for 2008 for Martin ROLFE ~ a POL
employee working at Bracknell)
The request was passed onto CSC for action by them.
I would be grateful for an update on this as the underlying issues now apply to a number of cases.
Many thanks
With best wishes
Ian R Henderson CCE CISA FCA
Advanced Forensics - London, UK
Forensic computing expert witness and electronic disclosure specialist
UK Mobile
LinkedIn: http://linkedin. com:
Twitter: http://twitter.com;
CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at irk
delete the email and any attachments. ~
From: Ian Henderson [7
Sent: 12 September 2013 11:20
To: ‘Andy Holt’
Cc: 'rwarming
Subject: RE: Email retreival
Andy
The request is for all of 2008 for employee Martin Rolfe
We require both Sent and Received ~ ideally the entire NSF file from the backup of the Domino server
Depending what is found, there may be further request for an extended time frame or emails relating to other
employees.
POL-0058223
POL00061744
POL00061744
With best wishes
Tan R Henderson CCE CISA FCA
Advanced Forensics - London, UK
Forensic computing expert witness and electronic disclosure specialist
Email: ir!
Website: hr
Linkedin:
CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged.
and
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at irhf
Subject: Email retréival
lan
Remind me the name of the person and the time frame of emails you want — I have given CSC clarity on the
requirement, they just need this to progress. Presume you want both sent and received.
Does that cover your requirement.
Andy
Andy Holt I Business Relationship Management
andy. holt
Ie
eerrrererrrerererr errr rrr rrerrer rrr trr erent eter errr tre rerrt try
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this in
error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions
expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD STREET,
LONDON EC1V 9HQ.
JOH IO IG IOI IOI OHO IIIS I DIOS IDI ISO II DDI ADSI DIA IIE
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
POL-0058223
POL00061744
POL00061744
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this in
error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions
expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD STREET,
LONDON EC1V 9HQ.
JOH SOI U I IOUS IO ISO ISI II DISD DI ISO IID ADI I IA
alate to the official business of Boa
ain
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this in
error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions
expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD STREET,
LONDON EC1V 9HQ.
POL-0058223