POL00120165 - Post Office - Security Project Initiation Document (PID) - Product X Fraud Reductio. v.1

Evidence on official site

IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE

Security
Project Initiation Document (PID)

Project Title:

Product X Fraud Reduction

Version Control:

Version 1.1 — Dated 8 Feb 10

Author and Project David Jones
Manager:
Project Sponsor: Jain Murphy

POL00120165
POL00120165
IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE

Contents

1. Background
1.1. Project Aim
1.2. Project Scope and Benefits

2. Project Phases
21
2.2
2.3
24

3. Project Organisation Structure
3.1. Organisational Diagram.

3.2. Roles and Responsibilities

4. Project Finance

5. Project Assumptions Risks and Constraints

Annex: A. Project Time Line

aS BW WwW wo

a

POL00120165
POL00120165
POL00120165
POL00120165

IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE

1. Background
1.1 Project Aim

The aim of this project is to support the migration of all branches to Horizon Online
(HOL), primarily the cash verification exercise being carried out. It will identify and
address the potential for fraud risk and subsequent losses incurred.

1.2 Project Scope and Benefits

The project will focus on the fraud risk elements of the migration plan including:

¢ Input to the cash verification check process.

¢ Input to the roll-out plans for HOL migration (understand number of checks,
timescales, resource; skills & constraints)
Analysis on the number of potential cash shortages likely to materialise.
Identify suspicious M.1. activities in branches (pre, during and post migration).
Mitigate for the potential impact of cash shortages within the network, from a
fraud/contractual perspective.

2. Project Phases

Phase 1- Identification and measurement of fraud within HNGX
Phase 2- Mitigation options and recommendations

Phase 3- Mitigation implementation

Phase 4- Post implementation review

2.1 Identification and measurement of fraud within HNGX
e Report drafted and submitted to SLT and other Stakeholders.

e Basic analysis to ascertain likely impact of fraud cases.
e Ongoing monitoring/liaising during pilot migration.

2.2 Mitigation options and recommendations
IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE

e All Stakeholders engaged and agreement secured on Security remits.

e The 15 x Investigators only call (where possible) on non investigation
colleagues (from all Strands) to assist in support officer capacity.

e Support officers assist with other elements of the investigations e.g.
tape transcripts, evidence gathering, witness statements, committals,
etc.

e 2 Fraud Team Leaders, 2 Financial Investigators and 4 Fraud Risk
Managers are PACE trained and can undertake enquiries.

e This increases the investigative resource by over 50%, though
allowances would need to be made in respect of individuals BAU
remits:

e Individuals in other Strands are PACE trained and could further
alleviate pressures on the Fraud Team by undertaking investigations
(with similar allowances made for BAU activities).

e Review current cases on hand (now/new year) and where appropriate
close non urgent or less priority, completed cases. NB: there have
been culls in recent years (ODR, BAU, previous reorganisations).
*Active case management is currently ongoing with the expectation of
a further reduction by Feb 2010.

e *As at Dec09, fraud casework currently has 143 active cases on hand:
running approximately 75% of capacity, with the ability to take on an
additional circa 40+ cases across the two teams.

e In preparation for HOL migration, audit team activity will be minimal in
December and January, further resulting in reduced fraud case files
being raised.

e Triggers and timescales to be confirmed as agreed (see Appendix 1) —
in a similar way that Audit/Contracts have a trigger for
involvement/suspension.

e Cases to be ‘stacked and packed’ — there may be delays in that cases
take longer to investigate, but dealt with in a priority order and as and
when basis.

e Assistance from elsewhere within RMG or externally could be
necessary if the volume of losses is higher and/or expectations
materialise re investigations.

2.3 Mitigation Implementation

The Project Manager will be responsible for ensuring that agreed recommendations
from phase 2.2 are successfully implemented. These will be considered and
factored into implementation as and when the need arises.

2.4 Post Implementation review

Following phase 2.3, losses within HNGX will be monitored on a regular basis to
assess the effectiveness and all results/outputs reported accordingly.

3. Project Organisation Structure

POL00120165
POL00120165
POL00120165
POL00120165

IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE

3.1. Organisation Diagram

‘Andy Hayward
Fraud Risk Team

Project Manager
Dave Posnett
Fraud Risk Team:

[ [ I I 1

Project Team Project Team ‘Project Team Project Team
Network Support GR REBK 67 “Crime Risk Fraud Operations
John Breeden & Lin Cathy Macdonald & I I Jo Hancock & Helen Jason Collins &

Norbury {__ Alison Bolsover. Rose ‘Andrew Daley

Project Team:
‘Network Support
Adrian Wales &Sue
Richardson

3.2. Roles and Responsibilities

There are a number of individuals who will play an important role in ensuring the
success of this Project:

Andy Hayward Provide strategic direction and governance of the
Project

Dave Posnett Overall management of the Project

AW & SR Report on issues/progress/findings, and engage
JB&LN Discuss/deal with contracts — fraud/non fraud

CM & AB Provide data and monitoring function re branch
migrations

JH &HR Provide strategic analysis (recommendations/concerns)
JC & AD Deal with and discuss/agree on fraud resource/cases

4. Project Finances

The migration process will be conducted under Business As Usual. Within
this T&S costs will increase, but costs in respect of the Security Team should
be minimal, but dependent on the intervention undertaken.

e Current audit intervention realise shortages at 3-4% of visits. This
would equate to circa 400 offices with shortages following migration.

e Of this total approximately one third result in a criminal investigation,
potentially approximately 100-150 additional case files being raised.
*(In 2008/09 253 cases were raised, handled by 15 fraud
investigators).

e Audit deficiencies year to date amount to £613k, 89% of all casework
raised. Although the cash verification exercise could increase the total
of audit deficiencies, in mitigation given that branches will be informed
POL00120165
POL00120165

IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE

5. Project Assumptions, Risks and Constraints

POLO0120165
POL00120165

IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE

Annex: Project Timeline

Project time-line showing how long each phase will take to complete.

Phase 1 Identification and measurement of fraud
within HNGX

Phase 2 Mitigation options and recommendations
Phase 3 Mitigation implementation

Phase 4 Post implementation review

April 10 May 10 Jun 10 July 10