POL00125093 - Email from Kathryn Alexander to Carole Butler, Chris J Gilding and others re: M029 Report case summary.

Evidence on official site

POL00125093
POL00125093

Subject: FW: M029 Report [BD-4A.FID25887033]
From: Kathryn Alexander <. : GRO. >
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14
To: Carole Butler
Chris J Gilding <

Judy Balderson ¢
Karen Derbe <

Michelle Keohane <i
Paul D Holland
Rhianne Fox <~~

FYI and will help in summation of cases where appropriate

KAth

Kath Alexander I Network Support BAU Area Manager
{split}

1st Floor Admin Swansea Mail Centre Siemens Way SWANSEA SA1 1AA

postoffice.co.uk
@postofficenews

{footer}

From: Parsons, Andrew [mailtof GRO...

Sent: 04 February 2014 14:50

To: Shirley Hailstones

Cc: Leigh-Doyle, Cathal; Kathryn Alexander; Angela Van-Den-Bogerd; David Oliveri; Jessica Barker;
Rodric Williams

Subject: RE: M029 Report [BD-4A.FID25887033]

Shirley (and Kath)

Please find attached my comments on M029. You will have seen most of these comments previously —
POL00125093

POL00125093

my only recent changes are to the "training" and "summary" sections of the Executive Summary.

The changes reflect the advice we have received from Cartwright King (attached) about making
concessions. In essence:

If POL concedes in any case that its old processes were inadequate, then this concession may
need to be disclosed to any SPMR involved in a criminal case. We therefore need to be very careful
about doing this as it will have significant consequences.

If POL concedes that its old processes were not followed in a specific case due to the specific
circumstances of that case, that raises a small risk of needing to make a criminal disclosure. This
should be ok but we would need CK's view on this on a case-by-case basis.

If POL concedes that the outcome of a case may have been different under its current practices
(eg. under current practices POL would have intervened earlier, etc.) then that should be ok.

In practice, the investigators (and my team here) need to be careful about how they phrase any
concession to make sure it accurately describes the situation in questions. Otherwise, we risk getting tied
up in unnecessary discussions about criminal law disclosures. You'll see that CK have provided some
suggested "safe" wording in the attached document.

Kind regards
Andy

Andrew Parsons
Senior Associate
for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP

{cid:image001 jpg@01CE3A00.C5D848A0}

Follow Bond Dickinson:

{cid:image006.jpg@01CE4584.3F945B50}{cid:image007 .jpg@01CE4584.3F945B50}
POL00125093
POL00125093

www.bonddickinson.com

From: Shirley Hailstones [mailto’
Sent: 23 January 2014 20:00
To: Parsons, Andrew; Angela Van-Den-Bogerd
Cc: Leigh-Doyle, Cathal; Parmenter, Claire
Subject: RE: M029 Report [BD-4A.FID25887033]

Hi Andy

Thanks for that: I'll have a look in the morning & discuss with the case handler.

I'll catch up with you at some point tomorrow afternoon.

Shirley

Shirley Hailstones I Case Review Manager
{split}
Guildhall, 57 Queen St, Glasgow, G1 3AT

Confidential Information:
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.

If you are not the intended recipient please contact me by reply email and destroy all copies of the
POL00125093
POL00125093

original message.

From: Parsons, Andrew [mailto
Sent: 23 January 2014 16:59
To: Angela Van-Den-Bogerd; Shirley Hailstones

Cc: Leigh-Doyle, Cathal; Parmenter, Claire
Subject: M029 Report [BD-4A.FID25887033]

a8

Angela, Shirley

Please find attached BD's comments on M029, which is looking good.

We haven't run this case past CK yet for legal sign off because a one of the points made in this report
may cause them concern.

The report notes that POL could may perhaps have intervened earlier in this branch. I ran this scenario
(just as a hypothetical question) past CK earlier this week and they have responded saying that this could
cause a serious criminal risk (see attached.)

I'm meeting CK on Tuesday at 10am at Old Street to discuss this issue in more detail (you're more than
welcome to attend but they've schedule this for 2 hours so you may want to leave the lawyers to it in the
first instance!).

I've attached the report anyway so that your investigator can have a look at the few other points raised.
However, this report cannot go out until the above issue is sorted.

If you'd like to discuss before the CK meeting, please do feel free to give me a call.

Kind regards

Andy

Andrew Parsons
POL00125093

POL00125093

Senior Associate
for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP

{cid:image001 jpg@01CE3A00.C5D848A0}

Follow Bond Dickinson:

{cid:image006 jpg@01CE4584.3F945B50}{cid:image007 jpg@01CE4584.3F945B50}

www.bonddickinson.com

Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?

The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged and
protected by law. shirley. hailstones_ ithorised to access this e-mail and any

may be unlawful.

Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before
transmission. Bond Dickinson LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.

Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Bond Dickinson LLP, is neither given
nor endorsed by it.

This email is sent for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP which is a limited liability partnership
registered in England and Wales under number OC317661. Our registered office is St Ann’s Wharf, 112
Quayside, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 3DX, where a list of members’ names is open to inspection. We
use the term partner to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant who is of equivalent
standing. Our VAT registration number is GB123393627.

Bond Dickinson LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
POL00125093
POL00125093

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then
delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of
the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD
STREET, LONDON EC1V 9HQ.