POL00139292 - Postmaster Litigation - Bates & 90 Others v. Post Office Limited - Agenda for steering group meeting

Evidence on official site

POL00139292
POL00139292

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE

Postmaster Litigation - Bates & 90 Others v. Post Office Limited

Agenda for Steering Group meeting on 20 July 2016

1. Feedback on Letter of Response
Introduction (MD, PB, TM, TW)
Exec Summary (MD, PB, RW, TM, TW)
3: POL knowledge of the dispute (MU, PB, TW)

4A: Factual background to Post Office and Postmaster relationship
(AVDB, TM)

4B-4F: Legal arguments on the Postmaster contract (AVDB, JM,
RW, TM)

Para 5.2-5.4: Comments on Second Sight’s failings (AVDB, PB, TW)
5A: Defects in Horizon (RH, RW - Fujitsu)

5B: Remote Access — no review necessary

5C-5E: Training, access to information and support (AVDB, TM)
5F: Prosecutions (RW)

6: Heads of claim (RW)

7A: Financial Loss (RW, TW)

7B-7F: Other heads of loss

8: Barred claims (RW)

9: Counterclaims (RW, TM)

10: GLO — no review necessary

11: Non-victimisation (AVDB, RW, TM)

12: Disclosure, OSA and SS confidentiality (RW, TM)

13: Mediation / settlement (RW, TM)

14: Next steps (RW)

POL-BSFF-0001480
POL00139292
POL00139292

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE

Schedule 1: Documents to be disclosed (MU, RW)

Schedule 2: Schedule of information on claimants - no review
necessary

Schedule 3: History of events (AVDB, MU, PB, TW)

Schedule 4: Background to operation of a Post Office branch (AVDB,
TM)

Schedule 5: Contract models and variations (RW)

Schedule 6: Rebuttal of allegations against Horizon (RH, RW —
Fujitsu)

Schedule 7: Glossary — no review necessary

2. Actions

3. Confirm Next Meeting — 3 August 2016 at 1100

4. A.O.B.

POL-BSFF-0001480_0001