POL00139693 - Email chain from Jarnail Singh to Hugh Flemington CC Rodric Williams re: Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

Evidence on official site

POL00139693
POL00139693

From: Jarnail A SinghI

Sent: Thur 22/08/2013 1:44:12 PM (UTC)

To: Hugh Flemingtonf_ GRO

Ce: Rodric Williams[i

Subject: RE: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.F1D20472253]
Thanks Hugh

I hope to discuss this with Rob King and Andy Parson .

Jarnail Singh I Criminal Lawyer

(2) 148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ

Postline: 5460 3182

@) Post Office stories

® @postofficenews

From: Hugh Flemington

Sent: 22 August 2013 14:42

To: Jarnail A Singh

Cc: Rodric Williams

Subject: Re: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

So who is doing what.
Is andy at BD acting as the minutes keeper and producing an action log?

From: Jarnail A Singh

Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 09:03 AM

To: Hugh Flemington

Cc: Rodric Williams

Subject: RE: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

Hugh
This is on-going and come out of my email and yesterday’s regular meeting .Also my conversations with John Scott
Rob king and Andy Parson.
Andy /Rosie collates all issues on to spread sheet . Andy will come back to me on this.
From Investigation and prosecution view Dave Posnett and I will work to the following format to be agreed..
¢ — Issue/Matter
e Identified By/ Raised By

e Impact to Business (or Potential Impact)

e Impact to Prosecutions (or Potential Impact)
e Action

e Action Owner

e = Resolution/Output

Regards
Jarnail

Jarnail Singh I Criminal Lawyer

148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ

Post Office stories

@postofficenews

©OB®eOH®

From: Hugh Flemington

Sent: 22 August 2013 08:57

To: Jarnail A Singh

Cc: Rodric Williams

Subject: Re: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

Just to be clear what is the agreed format / output from the call and who is doing what plse?

From: Jarnail A Singh

Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 03:25 PM

To: John M Scott; Rob King

Cc: Gayle A Peacock; Susan Crichton; Hugh Flemington

Subject: RE: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

John

POL00139693
POL00139693

As agreed this morning, the way forward is for Dave Posnett and me to work strictly to the suggested format.

Jarnail Singh I Criminal Lawyer

@ 148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ
POL00139693
POL00139693

Post Office stories

@postofficenews

©®@®OEO

From: John M Scott

Sent: 21 August 2013 09:22

To: Parsons, Andrew

Cc: Jarnail A Singh; Rob King; Gayle A Peacock; John M Scott

Subject: RE: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

Andy.

Thanks — yes please. However we can discuss on the conf call, I would suggest that all the issues/matters raised are
also collated onto one action sheet so that there is a clear line of sight of:

e Issue/Matter

e Identified By/ Raised By

e Impact to Business (or Potential Impact)

e Impact to Prosecutions (or Potential Impact)
e = Action

e Action Owner

e ~Resolution/Output

Regards.

John.

From: Parsons, Andrew I. GRO 4)

Sent: 21 August 2013 09:12

To: John M Scott

Subject: FW: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

John
Are you happy for me to circulate this report to the wider group in advance of the call at 10?

Kind regards
Andy

Andrew Parsons
Senior Associate
POL00139693
POL00139693

for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP

Follow Bond Dickinson:

www.bonddickinson.com

From: Parsons, Andrew

Sent: 20 August 2013 18:56

To: ‘Jarnail A Singh’; John M Scott
Cc: Rob King; martin.smith,
Kayleigh-Lee

Subject: RE: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue [BD-4A.FID20472253]

i, Rodric Williams; Susan Crichton; Hugh Flemington; Harding,

Jarnail
In response to your questions at 3 below:
a) Who is retaining this information.

Minutes have been taken of each meeting, along with action points. These have now been collated into the attached
Weekly Report (see attached — sorry for the delay in circulating this - usual security password).

The Weekly Report also provides an at-a-glance view of any issues that have been escalated for review to the
criminal law team (see column 3). This column highlights just those issues that have been investigated and deemed
as potentially having a material effect on criminal prosecutions. This column does not list every "potential" issue that
needs investigation — these potential issues are captured in the minutes of each meeting.

b) Who is hunting down the issues.

See the action points in the Minutes of each meeting. Going forward, I suggest that we are diligent in making sure that
past actions are followed up and closed.

c) What has been the precise problem in each case .

To the extent that details about a problem are known these have been captured in the minutes. However, this will
always be challenging because the discussions at the meetings can be quite fluid.

d) How was each case resolved.

Where closure on an issue has been achieved, this has been/will be recorded in the minutes. This is probably a weak
spot in the process so far and needs to be tightened up going forward.

John — these are just my thoughts on how to manage and capture this information. Do you agree? Comments
welcomed.

Kind regards
Andy
POL00139693
POL00139693

Andrew Parsons

Senior Associate
for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP

Follow Bond Dickinson:

www.bonddicki

From: Jarnail A Singh f
Sent: 20 August 2013 15:08
To: John M Scott; Parsons,
Cc: Rob King; martin.smith: Rodric Williams; Susan Crichton; Hugh Flemington
Subject: RE: : Regular Wednesday Call re Horizon Issue

John/Andrew

1) I understand the remit of the above meeting was to established a weekly conference call to act
as a central hub for all Horizon related issues. Attendees to bring all Horizon related issues that
they had encountered -minutes were to be taken, centrally retained and disseminated to those who
required the information. Most certainly the POL’s Horizon expert and QC would require this
information

2)Four telephone conferences meetings have taken place where the following issues were
raised:

1) Concerns that Post Office Card Account transactions have been “lost in flight”. (Meeting of
24/7/13 - Prestbury’s)

2) Mention of undefined bugs at Hordern - Not sure if they are being investigated. (Meeting of
24/7/13)

3) Possible case of Horizon receipt printing incorrectly - 4 instead of a 1 (Meeting of 24/7/13)

4) Issue where if the cashier presses buyback when selling Euros the loss won’t be found. Will
not generate transaction correction. It will
be a hard loss that the SPMR will not be able to explain when audited. (Meeting of
31/7/13)

5) Errors in the Bureau de Change when remmed in as a quantity not a value. (Meeting of
31/7/13)

6) The issue of ATM theft by an engineer was raised at the meeting of 31/7/13. This was raised
again at the meeting of 7in August 2013 - list of this engineers activity requested. problems as to
how far records will go.

3) In light of the above can you clarify the following please:

a) Who is retaining this information.
POL00139693
POL00139693

b) Who is hunting down the issues.

c) What has been the precise problem in each case .

d) How was each case resolved.

4) The contact details of each attendee need to be circulated among the group..

Regards
Jarnail

Jarnail Singh I Criminal Lawyer

() 148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ

Post Office stories
©

®© @postofficenews

From: Jarnail A Singh

Sent: 20 August 2013 10:11
To: John M Scott

Cc: Rob King; Parsons, Andrew; martin.smith: .

Subject: : Regular Call re Horizon Issue

John

At the above group issues and concerns are raised and recorded The point is and which is also Susan’s concern that it
is important the issues raised at Wednesday mornings meeting are nailed down issue by issue. The issue is raised
hunted down concluded and documented in central place where it can be accessed by security and legal. Is this being
done if so by whom.

Jarnail Singh I Criminal Lawyer
SS a Ee
148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ

POL00139693
POL00139693

Post Office stories

@postofficenews

©OB@®OO

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named
recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have
received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system. Any views
or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD STREET,
LONDON EC1V 9HQ.

soe soe ee

Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?

and prot ly is authorised to access

ly privile;

‘soon as possible and delete
unlawful

Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmissior
‘which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening an;

ity for any loss or damage

Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Bond Dickinson LLP. is neither given nor endorsed by it

This email is sent fo
office is St Ann’s W
the LLP, or an employee or consultant who is of equivalent standing. Our VAT registration number is GB

«d on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP which is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC317661. Our registered
112 Quayside, Neweastle Upon Tyne, NEL 3DX, where a list of members’ names is open to inspection, We use the term partner to refer to a member of

Bond Dickinson LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority