POL00143377
POL00143377
Message
From: Andy Cash I, ___GRO I
Sent: 16/07/2012 10:02:03
To: Jarnail A Singh [/O=MMS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jarnail.a.singh6ceadabd-67e9-4eca-94f2-0057 16658847]
ce: Susan Crichton [/O=MMS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Susan,
Crichtonc5fa6431-dc28-49ab-8f0f-be4237a4ad4f]; Hugh Flemington [/O=MMS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE
=Hugh.flemington14106a9a-9886-403d-bfSb-e08821f432b3]; Harry
Subject: RE: CASE NO 21392 - Prosecution v K Wylie ”
Jarnail,
Thanks for this. Do we take it that we "resist" defence requests in the terms of your email? I would
like formal confirmation bearing in mind the view taken by counsel. If further consultation with
Harry or otherwise would assist please let me know. I will need to reply to Kim Wylie's solicitors this
week.
Regards
Andy
From: Jarnail A Singhi_
Sent: 16 July 2012 09:55
To: Andy Cash
Cc: Susan Crichton; Hugh Flemington
Subject: RE: CASE NO 21392 - Prosecution v K Wylie
Andy.
Thank you.
Tagree Defence will approach to stay the prosecution until the review by second sight is completed will
become increasingly common. Post office view is that such an approach be resisted. Review to be conducted is
limited in scope in few and isolated cases . Second sight would work with a number of MP’s(two at present) to review
cases that have been raised by their constituents. Second sights appointment is presently being agreed with the MPs and
justice for sub postmasters .There is no legal or forensic grounds to argue defendants will not get fair trial or
abuse of process. There is no reason to justify the case being stayed, The fact that the review is being carried
out is not an acknowledgment that there is an issue with Horizon .the system working properly and is being
used up and down the country. when the system has been challenged in criminal courts has been successfully
defended. There is no mileage in this position but is in fact supe
Regards
Jarnail singh
From: Andy Cash I GRO i
Sent: 11 July 2012 13: -
To: Jarnail A Singh
Subject: CASE NO 21392 - Prosecution v K Wylie
Dear Jarnail,
T enclose advice from Harry Bowyer. I know it will be unpalatable, but for what it may be worth I
share his view. In the instant case, our response must be dependent on time scales for completion of
the inspection. We are only just beginning to see these issues raised by defence solicitors and the
POL00143377
POL00143377
sooner we grasp the problem the better. If you want any more do call, otherwise I will await the
outcome of your consultations before responding to the defence.
sincerely,
CartwrightKing
Ee eee I
Nottingham I Birmingham { Derby I Leicester} Sheffield I Newcastle Gateshead
Majority House, 51 Lodge Lane, Derby, DE1 3HB
www.cartwrightking.co.uk
This message is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you have received this in error please delete this message and let us know by email
or telephone. A list of directors is available at each office. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No: 312459. VAT Registration No:
737837295.
Je SEIS ISOS II TODO I IO NIO BIOTA IIIA II II O AI AT IOI I IIIA
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this in
error, please contact the sender and then delete this email from your system.
ROYAL MAIL GROUP LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 100 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y
OHQ with the registered company number 04138203
POST OFFICE LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 148 OLD STREET, LONDON EC1V 9HQ with the registered
company number 02154540
JER ODDO ISON I OO OSS IO ISB AI II IOI IIIB ITI III III II IOI IIE