POL00164215
POL00164215
From: Kevin Ryan...
Sent: Tue 03/09/2013 12:
To: Simon I Hutchinson[i
Subject: FW: Agreed Scottish Prosecution process
Think this is for you
Kev
Kevin Ryan I Security Manager
@ 4" Floor, 120 Bark Street, Bolton, BL1 2AX
©
From: Jarnail A Singh
Sent: 03 September 2013 13:42
To: Irvine, Laura; John M Scott; martin smith
Cc: Robert Daily; Kevin Ryan; Rob King; Darrell Kennedy; Hugh Flemington; Susan Crichton
Subject: RE: Agreed Scottish Prosecution process
Laura, John and Martin
Thank for your assistance . The following Scottish Prosecution Process has been agreed in all POL prosecutions ; Please
note and distribute to your teams.
1. Investigations and security team prepare report outline evidence(evidence Package)and Recommendations
2 Report recommends criminal enforcement action
3 Yes? referred to POL criminal lawyer. Enters details of file as Scottish case.
4 Referral to External lawyers (CK) for input on impact of 2™ sight internal report on Horizon systems and issues in
light of fresh Knowledge.
5.Referral to Pol Criminal lawyer Scottish Agent (bto) for legal put for any further evidence or investigation
required and /or written advice recommends ;
a )No further action Or
b) Case referred to PFO
6. Referred to Pol criminal lawyer with written advice and recommendation
7. referred to Decision maker for approval on recommendation.
8. referred to PFO or no further action.
Many Thanks
Jarnail
Jarnail Singh I Criminal Lawyer
saan ss an Rees
@) 148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V 9HQ.
A
POL00164215
POL00164215
©
Mobex:
a)
‘S)
©
Post Office stories
oO
®
@postofficenews
©
x
From: Irvine, Laura I.
Sent: 30 August 2013 07:00
To: Jarnail A Singh
Cc: John M Scott; martin smith
Subject: Re: Draft Scottish Prosecution process
Jarnail, Martin and John
I am happy with Jarnail's suggestion as long as Martin is happy to look at the case first with one eye on the need for
corroboration in Scotland and the necessity for an increased reliance on Horizon. Martin - I am happy to discuss
further but that is now set out in yesterday's paper. As we have discussed before, our disclosure obligation is a bit
more extensive because of corroboration and the other issues.
Kind regards
Laura
Sent from my iPad
On 29 Aug 2013, at 13:52, "Jarnail A Singh"
_p wrote:
John, Martin and Laura
After our recent conversations please see my thought process for your comments .
1. Investigations and security team prepare report outline evidence(evidence Package)and
Recommendations
2 Report recommends criminal enforcement action
3 Yes? referred to POL criminal lawyer. Enters details of file as Scottish case.
4 Referral to External lawyers (CK) for input on impact of 2™ sight internal report on Horizon systems
and issues in light of fresh Knowledge.
5.Referral to Pol Criminal lawyer Scottish Agent (bto) for legal put for any further evidence or
investigation required and /or written advice recommends ;
a )No further action Or
b) Case referred to PFO
6. Referred to Pol criminal lawyer with written advice and recommendation
7. referred to Decision maker for approval on recommendation.
8. referred to PFO or no further action.
Jarnail Singh I Criminal Lawyer
POL00164215
POL00164215
<image002.jpg>
<image004.png> 148 Old Street, LONDON, EC1V
9HQ
<image006.png>
<image008.png>
<image010.png>
<image012.jpg> Post Office stories
<image014.jpg> @postofficenews
<image016.jpg>
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then
delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of
the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD
STREET, LONDON EC1V 9HQ.
Je HORII IO IBIS IO IIIS IIS IIS III II II IIIS IO IIIS III III
fidential. Its contents are protected by copyright and may be privileged. If received in error please contact us
i land delete it from your system. Brechin Tindal Oatts ("bto") does not accept any responsibility for viruses
and it is your responsibility to Scan this email (and any attachments). bto's email system is subject to random monitoring
No contract may be concluded by bto by email unless the sender is a partner or associate of bto and the email expressly states that it is intended to create
a contract. Views expressed in this email are the views of the sender and may not reflect the views of bto. A list of the partners of bto is available for
inspection during office hours at 48 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow, G2 5HS.