Searchable transcripts of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry hearings
  • Transcripts
  • Evidence list
Searchable transcripts of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry hearings
  • Evidence
  • POL00190324 - Email from Rodric Williams to Andrew Parsons re Fw: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not for Wider Circulation

POL00190324 - Email from Rodric Williams to Andrew Parsons re Fw: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not for Wider Circulation

Evidence on official site

POL00190324
POL00190324

Message

From: Rodric Williams {

on behalf of — Rodric Williams

Sent: 03/07/2013 08:

To: ‘andrew.parsons,_ a

Subject: Fw: Report: Lepto ge - Not for Wider Circulation

Attachments: Horizon data Lepton SPSO 191320 CONFIDENTIAL.docx

Andy - cam you pls take a look at this so you can give me an overview on the phone some time today.

Thanks Rod

From: Dave Posnett

Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 04:19 PM

To: Rodric Williams

Subject: FW: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not for Wider Circulation

Rodric,
Any response to the email below yet?

Regards,

Dave Posnett I Accredited Financial Investigator

148 Old St, London, ECIV 9HQ

From: Dave Posnett

Sent: 14 June 2013 10:23

To: Rodric Williams

Cc: John M Scott; Dave Pardoe; Elaine Spencer; Helen Rose

Subject: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not for Wider Circulation

Rodric,

Please find associated a report from our Fraud Analyst, Helen Rose, in respect of
Lepton SPSO. This office doesn’t feature as part of our 2™ Sight Spot Reviews,
but the subject matter is Horizon (and indeed Credence) related. Could I ask
that you consider the report and feed any comments back, as it could be a
potential issue at some stage.

In summary, the specifics concern a ‘system reversal’ of a transaction following
a system failure. This is normal practice, but the Horizon logs (and Credence

POL-BSFF-0028387
POL00190324
POL00190324

logs) indicate that the reversal is an ‘existing reversal’, implying that the
reversal was manually entered by the clerk/Subpostmaster.

I think there’s a remote possibility that this could be a problem in terms of
using the data for evidence/prosecution purposes, but nevertheless it is still a

possibility. Myself or Helen are happy to talk through anything that requires
explanation.

Regards,

Dave Posnett I Accredited Financial Investigator

148 Old St, London, EC1V 9HQ

SORIA G IOI IODA IODA BI I B IIA ODI II ISO AI IAAI III AIT

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient,
you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this in
error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions
expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD STREET,
LONDON EC1V 9HQ.

POL-BSFF-0028387_0001
Previous Next

© Crown Copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Converted by Matthew Somerville.