POL00321147
POL00321147
From: Jane MacLeod[/O=MMS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP.
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JANE MACLEOD01E4066C-E8DB-4A0C-B4F9-
1CFF9A3D100849C]
Sent: Wed 07/10/2015 11:47:10 AM (UTC)
To: [
Ce: Melanie Corfi Mark
Underwood; GRO
Subject: RE: Sparrow
I have a 1:1 with Paula tomorrow afternoon and proposed to raise the Sparrow issues with her then.
On Lyca, we will get a note to Mark shortly to share with Shex - I will provide a copy for Paul so that she is sighted on
this. Again, I will brief Paula on the issues tomorrow.
Jane MacLeod
General Counsel
Ground Floor
20 Finsbury Street
LONDON
EC2Y 9AQ
From: Tom Wechsler
Sent: 07 October 2015 12:11
To: Mark R Davies; Patrick Bourke; Rodric Williams
Cc: Jane MacLeod; Melanie Corfield; Mark Underwood:
Subject: RE: Sparrow
Further to Mark's message below, Paula has a call with BNR at 9.30 on Friday. She will need a short speaking note.
Patrick - are you happy to provide?
Mark - Do you think we need to cover the Lyca issue too?
I'm happy to talk through a potential approach - indeed it may be beneficial to consider our pitch collectively? Let me
know. For what it is worth, I support Jane's view that allowing Tim Parker the space to consider what impact these
meetings might have on his work is important.
Tom
Tom Wechsler
Chief of Staff
From: Mark R Davies
Sent: 07 October 2015 09:43
To: Patrick Bourke; Rodric Williams oe
Cc: Jane MacLeod; Melanie Corfield; Mark UnderwoodercTom Wechsler
Subject: Sparrow
All
POL00321147
POL00321147
In haste as travelling.
Richard C called.
BNR wants to see SAH and Second Sight. Richard agreed with her that this would not happen ahead of a Paula call with
her. So we need to get that in diary and brief Paula.
Separately ShEx met NFSP who raised with them - and worried them - prosecutions approach. NFSP view is SPMRs are
now widely blaming losses on Horizon "knowing" there will likely be no prosecutions. They also cited a case where a
member of staff was accused of theft, blamed Horizon and we are now pursuing the SPMR for the money despite clear
evidence of staff being to blame. Obviously I don't know any more details.
Where are we on the prosecutions piece?
M
Mark Davies
Communications and Corporate Affairs Director Post Office Ltd
From my iPhone and therefore possibly in transit so please forgive spelling mistakes or brevity!