POL00352632
POL00352632
Message
From: Melanie Corfield [/O=MMS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP
(FYDIBOHF 23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MELANIE CORFI1DE623C2-38B2-49FB-AE9A-12E4B20D626720C]
Sent: 11/03/2015 16:52:03
To:
Subject:
Thanks!
From: Mark R Davies
Sent: 11 March 2015 16:47
To: Melanie Corfield
Subject: Re: James Arbuthnot
I suggest we say - we have made the position clear in our report and in our statement. We have published very detailed
update. It is regrettable that a misleading impression is being created.
Mark Davies
Communications and Corporate Affairs Director
Mobile:"”” GRO
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Mar 2015, at 16:44, "Melanie Corfield" + GRO > wrote:
Inevitably R5SLive are asking, on the back of our statement — are we saying Mr Arbuthnot is
wrong? Since he’s standing down I am tempted to just go back with “yes” but I guess that’s
unacceptable! Also it’s semantics re the word “sacking”
I was going to say: “Mr Arbuthnot’s question could create a very inaccurate impression because we are
not suppressing Second Sight’s report or destroying documents”
or something like that.
Would appreciate advice re how far to go (although we need to stay measured to avoid a story on PO
calling him a liar!)
Thanks
Mel Corfield
Communications Team
1* Floor — Old Street