UKGI00008833 - Email from Jane MacLeod to Watson, Richard Callard, and Rodric Williams.. RE: Post Office Litigation

Evidence on official site

UKG100008833
UKGI00008833

From: Jane MacLeod
Sent: Tue 18/12/2018 3:25:09 PM (UTC)
To: Cooper, Tom - UKGE

Cc: Watson, Richa
WilliamsI
Subject: Post Office - Litigation CONFIDENTIAL AND SUBJECT TO LEGAL PRIVILEGE - DO NOT
FORWARD.
Hi Tom,

We are in the process of finalising an update to the Board on the litigation, and propose to include a section outlining
the governance process for any required decision about an appeal, given the likelihood that this issue will arise before
the January board. Additionally, we are developing a matrix that will help to flag those outcomes about which we
will be most concerned based on impact to POL’s business; this will be similar to the approach we developed for the
contingency planning earlier this year, and we will circulate that matrix early in January.

We believe it is likely that the draft judgment will be released to us a few days before it is formally handed down. In
that period we have the opportunity to comment on factual errors, however the judgment will be subject to an
embargo and the Trial Judge has made it clear that the embargo will be strictly enforced.

The Civil Procedure Rules (Practice Direction 40E) restrict circulation of a draft judgment to “within the organisation”,
provided it is also:

- kept confidential;

- not disclosed to any other person or used in the public domain; and

- not acted upon (other than internally) before the judgment is handed down.
Any enquiries about who can receive a draft judgment are to be sent to the Judge.

The judgement will be made available to POL’s legal team and we will provide analysis and a recommendation as
soon as possible following receipt (recognising that the judgment is likely to be long and necessarily complex given
the range of issues). Ideally (if we wish to appeal) we would seek leave to appeal at the point at which the judgment
is handed down, although we will have up to 14 days following that date to do so.

We propose that an informal ‘committee’ be formed comprising of the Chairman, CEO, CFOO, and yourself to receive
a briefing on the judgment and make any required decision as to appeal. However your involvement will be as a POL
director — not as a representative of UKGI, and therefore you would not be able to share the decision with anyone
from UKGI or BEIS ahead of the judgment being formally handed down.

Would you please advise whether you are prepared to proceed on this basis? I have spoken to Richard already to
alert him to this issue, and he will discuss this with you. As ever, Rod and I also remain available should you wish to
discuss it further.

Kind regards,

Jane

Jane MacLeod
Group Director of Legal, Risk & Governance

Ground Floor

20 Finsbury Street
UKG100008833
UKG100008833

LONDON
EC2Y 9A\

EER A 2 RR A RR I ORR A SRR ROG A RRR COCR GR GARR CER OR COA GRR CORR

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named
recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you
have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system.
Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically
stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: Finsbury Dials,
20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.

HERR RR A KR FRR A KR FARR INRIA A OR OR AR A ROR ao

“Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy. Information about how we do this can be found
on our website at www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy”

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com