Searchable transcripts of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry hearings
  • Transcripts
  • Evidence list
Searchable transcripts of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry hearings
  • Evidence
  • UKGI00009767 -Email from Tom Cooper to MPST Tolhurst (Kelly) RE: POL Litigation - legal advice and concerns about leadership at the company.

UKGI00009767 -Email from Tom Cooper to MPST Tolhurst (Kelly) RE: POL Litigation - legal advice and concerns about leadership at the company.

Evidence on official site

UKG100009767
UKGI00009767

From: Tom.CooperG_

Sent: Thur 16/05/2019 (UTC)

To: MPST.Tolhurs GRO
Subject: POL litigation cornnnninnn
Kelly

I gather you mentioned a couple of things to the team after the meeting with POL yesterday. One being what happened
at the Board in relation to the legal advice. The other that you're concerned about the leadership at the company.
Litigation

On the legal front, I can say that my concerns about how it was being handled go back to last summer. I wasn’t happy
with the meeting the company had with you and Alex last October. This was followed up by a very critical ruling from the
judge a few months later following which I spoke to Tim and Paula to say that I felt there needed to be a major change of
approach. Our interaction to the legal team at POL wasn't limited to the litigation - in general we found the chief counsel
wasn't easy to deal with and I had passed feedback to the management and Tim on various occasions.

Things came to a head after the common issues judgement when it became totally clear - I think to everyone on the
Board - that there needed to be a change of personnel. This led to Jane MacLeod - Chief Counsel - leaving the Company
and Herbert Smith being appointed to run the litigation reporting to the Board.

Because there was little time to make the change it was wasn't discussed in a full Board meeting. The process was
handled by Tim, Al and me with Tim speaking bilaterally to the rest of the Board to agree the decision. I don’t believe the
decision itself was in any way controversial.

This is my perspective of what happened. Of course I can’t speak to what other conversations took place between other
Board members and the Board and management.

As a NED I can only influence things and I'm learning that usually the same point needs to be repeated several times
before it lands. I’m also not always right either.

So overall I’m glad the changes have been made and I think we should be satisfied with them for now. We are seeing a
change of approach as a result. I only wish it had happened several months ago - before the Common Issues trial.

Leadership
It's very important for me to understand what's on your mind here. Could we discuss face to face?

Tom

Sent from my iPhone
Previous Next

© Crown Copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Converted by Matthew Somerville.