WBON0000138 - Email from Katie Simmonds to Amy Prime, Lucy Bremner, Johnathon Gribben CC: Others RE: Witness Statement - OCR and Peak [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]

Evidence on official site

WBONO0000138
WBON0000138

From: Katie Simmonds

To: Amy Prime {~ :
Jonathan Gribben: ___GRO

Ce: Andrew Parsons
Subject: RE: Witness Statement - OCR and Peak [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:32:18 +0000
Importance: Normal
Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; image004.png; imageb6409f.PNG;
image8d7505.PNG; image92aflb.PNG; image585483.PNG

Lucy Bremner

Amy

As per our call, I've responded in line below.

Katie Simmonds
Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.

Manage your e-alert preferences

WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON &) (in)

From: Amy Prime

Sent: 17 June 2019 22:06

To: Katie Simmonds; Lucy Bremner; Jonathan Gribben

Cc: Andrew Parsons

Subject: RE: Witness Statement - OCR and Peak [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]

Hi All

Two questions from TRQC on the Peak disclosure — if you could respond first thing in the morning that would be
helpful as I can then get the witness statement over to FJ.

[WHAT ABOUT ALL THE OTHER POST 17 AUGUST 2018 PEAKS THAT HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE — HAVE

THEY NOT BEEN DISCLOSED AT ALL?]

WBD_000008.000001
WBONO0000138
WBON0000138

My understanding is that no other peaks which postdate 17 August 2018 have been disclosed since neither Freeths
nor Coyne have asked for disclosure of these documents. Please could you check whether you know of any other
peaks which were disclosed separately (ie. other Peaks which FJ gave us as when doing the bug work?

This aligns with my understanding — I'm not aware of any further additional Peaks which have been disclosed/
provided by FJ separately.

[CAN WE ADD A SENTENCE EXPLAINING WHY IT TOOK FROM 3 APRIL TO 31 MAY FOR THE DOCUMENT TO
BE DISCLOSED, TO FORESTALL A DEMAND FROM THE JUDGE FOR A FURTHER WITNESS STATEMENT
EXPLAINING THIS?]

The Peak was provided to Katie by Matthew on 29 March 2019 (email attached), the documents were processed into
R on 4 April, but my understanding is that we waited until the bug investigations were substantially complete and we
had what we believed to be all of the new documents which we thought would come out of these investigations and
then disclosure was given all in one go. Does this match your understanding? This comes partially from Katie's email
to Charlie on 22 May 2019 (attached) which just predates the disclosure of this peak.

As per our call, this isn't something that we discussed with Counsel and documents were simply being sent and added
to the disclosure tracker to be disclosed as and when the next list was run but appreciate this is something that was
discussed between you and Charlie in terms of waiting for a series of adverse documents to be disclosed in one go, as
opposed to simply drip feeding these.

Thanks
A

Amy Prime
Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP

Manage your e-alert preferences

WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON ¥) (in)
mz la

From: Anthony de Garr Robinson [mailto:
Sent: 17 June 2019 19:10
To: Amy Prime

WBD_000008.000002
WBONO0000138
WBON0000138

Cc: Owain Draper; 'Simon Henderson’; Jonathan Gribben; Katie Simmonds; Lucy Bremner; Andrew Parsons
Subject: RE: Witness Statement - OCR and Peak [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]

Dear Amy,

T enclose Owain’s and my combined suggestions for your draft statement. The last sentences of paras 6 and
16 need to be checked for absolute accuracy and may well need to be toned down. As regards the questions
at the end of para 21 and in para 22, I’m hoping we have satisfactory answers. If we don't, we know how the
judge will react. Quite apart from anything else, he may require further witness statement to be made.

Best wishes,

Tony

From: Amy Prime
Sent: 17 June 2019 13:59
To: Anthony de Garr Rol
Ce: Owain Draper I

‘Simon Henderson! { .

Jonathan Gribbet ; Katie Simmonds q GRO. i
Lucy Bremner Andrew Parsons
Subject: Witness Statement - OCR and Peak [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]

Dear Tony

Please find attached a draft witness statement explaining the recent OCR disclosure and the disclosure of the drop
and go Peak — comments and thoughts welcome.

We also have two questions:

1. Should this witness statement come from Andy or Katie (or another solicitor at WBD)? Andy wasn't particular
involved in either of these matters so is giving a lot of hearsay evidence in this statement. Katie was closest to
the OCR disclosure, with Jonny being closest to the Peak disclosure.

2. Do we want to waive privilege and exhibit to the witness statement the attached emails between Katie and FJ?
We would propose disclosing up to (and including) the email on 12 April 2019 @1620. Disclosing emails past
this point runs the risk of disclosing to Freeths the matters concerning the deletion.

Jonny — please could you also read the section which discusses your conversations with Pete Newsome re extraction
of the Peak system and confirm they are correct?

WBD_000008.000003
WBONO0000138
WBON0000138

Kind regards

Amy

Amy Prime
Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.

Manage your e-alert preferences

WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON &) (in)

Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?

The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confi
this e-mail and any attachments. If you are not arobinsont
dissemination, distribution, publication or copying of this Commun
our Privacy Policy on our website

and may be legally privileged and protected by law. arobinsonI “Jonly is authorised to access
please notify amy,primet as soon as possible and deleve any copies. Unauthorised use,
Gafion or attachments is prohibited and may be unlawful, Information about how we use personal di

Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmission, Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP accepts no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.

Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP, is neither given nor endorsed by it.

This email is sent by Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP which is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number 0C317661. Our registered
office is 4 More London Riverside, London, SE1 2AU, where a list of members’ names is open to inspection. We use the term partner to refer to a member of the LLP, or an
employee or consultant who is of equivalent standing. Our VAT registration number is GB12339362

Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is a member of Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited, which consists of independent and autonomous law firms providing
services in the US, the UK, and elsewhere around the world. Each Womble Bond Dickinson entity is a separate legal entity and is not responsible for the acts or omissions of,
nor can bind or obligate, another Womble Bond Dickinson entity. Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited does not practice law. Please see
www.womblebonddickinson.com/legal notices for further details,

Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

WBD_000008.000004