Searchable transcripts of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry hearings
  • Transcripts
  • Evidence list
Searchable transcripts of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry hearings
  • Evidence
  • WBON0000205 - Email from Andrew Parsons to Mark Underwood, Jane MacLeod, Rodric Williams and others Re: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal Privilege [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

WBON0000205 - Email from Andrew Parsons to Mark Underwood, Jane MacLeod, Rodric Williams and others Re: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal Privilege [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]

Evidence on official site

WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

From: 7 .
To: Mark Underwood! 4___ __._ GRO } Jane MacLeod
{ GRO 1, Rodric Williams
Ce: Amy Prim Rachel Scott
Subject: RE: Commo: ions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to
Legal Privilege [WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:13:54 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 190308 Subject_to_Legal_Privilege_-_Judgment_Actions.docx;
_DOC_154696974(1) Summary_of CIT_Judgment.docx;
UPDATED _Risk_Assessment_Table_-_10_March_2019.DOCX; BATES-
note100319.docx
Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; imagedf1586.PNG; image28a5fa.PNG;
image0599e4.PNG

Mark and all

Please find below and attached an update on our deliverables 1.1 — 1.6.

1.1 Determine whether the Judgment has any impact on the Horizon Trial which begins on Monday

The HIT Counsel team have been briefed and are taking the CIT judgment into account in their preparations.

Consideration has been given to adjourning the HIT. This is not recommended for two reasons:
There is very little chance the Judge would entertain it. Even making the application will get him (further) offside.
We have a largely new team in front of him on Monday, with mainly new witnesses. We therefore believe that the

better approach is to push for a "clean slate" with the judge and to urge him to come to this trial with an open mind.
We think this is unlikely to work given his comments in the CIT, but this is better than further antagonising him.

4.2 Handing down timing_and appeal

There are no means of preventing the Judgment from being handed down or suspending its effect.

Please see attached DCQC's note on lodging an appeal.

1.3 Judgment summary and impact

Please find attached two documents: an Initial Summary of the Judgment and the updated Risk Assessment Table.

WBD_000075.000001
WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

1.4 Sharing the Judgment with shareholder

Post Office can apply to the Judge for permission to share the Judgment with other organisations outside of PO.
There are no rules or tests for this — it is a matter of judicial discretion. It requires a formal application to be lodged
with the Court.

1.5 Branch Trading Statement

We do not believe that there is any immediate action that can be taken to allow the BTS to be relied on as an account
stated under the law of agency. There may be actions that can be taken in the future as part of a wider mitigation
strategy.

An action has been added for advice on whether the difficulty in relying on the BTS could affect false accounting
convictions. That is a question for Cartwright King who will need to be instructed by Post Office. We can of course
help prepare any supporting papers.

4.6 Corrections

Corrections are underway. Gideon Cohen plus a new junior Counsel has been instructed to assist with this. Alongside
our typographic corrections, we plan to lodge a few points where we believe that the Judgment could be clarified in
PO's favour. This will not however change the overall effect of the Judgment.

Kind regards

Andy

Andrew Parsons
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP

Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts

WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON v fin)

From: Mark Underwood1 [mailto: GRO

Sent: 10 March 2019 11:39
To: Jane MacLeod; Rodric Williams; Andrew Parsons

Cc: Amy Prime

Subject: RE: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal Privilege

WBD_000075.000002
WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

Thanks Jane

A calendar invitation for the call should now be in each of your diaries for 7:30pm this evening.

Andy — I tried to call — please ask DQC will come to FD tomorrow for 11am and ask that he keep Tuesday
morning free to join a call with the Board or come in in person if it becomes a F2F meeting.

I have attached:

o A revised version of the actions list, which I have added to since it was last circulated on
Friday

o A revised version of the ‘soundbites’ included in the judgment, which should now reflect the
Judgment in its entirety

o Paper on the Appeals process

o Paper on costs

o Andy /Amy — can you dig out the papers within which we discussed suspensions and acting
capriciously, + the admitted Stirling v Maitland and Necessary Cooperation implied terms

On tonight’s call, I would find it helpful to:

Understand any developments over the weekend
Progress made against the various bits of advice being sought

Plan for the week ahead

Mark

° Mark Underwood
Portfolio Director: Legal, Risk & Governance
Ground Floor

20 Finsbury Street
2017 Winner of the 1°70" £°7Y 942
Global Postal
Award for F
Mobile number: I
Customer Lam
Experience

WBD_000075.000003
WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

From: Jane MacLeod

Sent: 10 March 2019 08:40 .

To: Mark Underwood] + GRO +; Rodric Williams
a ‘GRO i ~~
Ce: andrew.parsons + GR
Subject: RE: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal
Privilege

Thanks Mark

GE is from 10.30 onwards tomorrow. We’ve cancelled the McKinsey session which was scheduled to go till
1 pm, so we effectively have 10.30-1.00pm. My suggestion would be for David to come at say 11/11.30 so
that we have time to address any other business before he comes in.

The Board call hasn’t been scheduled yet but is most likely to be in the morning (on the basis that that is
when the Chairman is usually in the office) so we need to know if there are any times that David couldn’t
make.

Thanks

Jane

PS Mark — you still have an out of office message on!

@ Jane MacLeod
Group Director of Legal, Risk & Governance

Ground Floor
20 Finsbury Street

LONDON
EC2Y 9AQ

From: Mark Underwood!
Sent: 09 March 2019 23:33
To: Jane MacLeod
Ce: andrew.parsons
Subject: Re: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal
Privilege

>; Rodric Williams <

WBD_000075.000004
WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

Hi Jane,

Would 6pm work for everyone ? I will assume it does unless i hear otherwise and put something in the diary.

Andy - Al has asked that David come to GE on Monday and the Board on Tuesday.

Jane - what time are these meeting please?

Mark

Mark Underwood

Portfolio Director: Legal, Risk & Governance

From: Jane MacLeod
Sent: Saturday, March
To: Mark Underwood1; Rodric Williams

Ce: andrew.parsons

Subject: Re: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal
Privilege

Thanks Mark,

I’m still trawling through the judgement again, but had also picked up these points. Subject to availability,
would it be possible for the 4 of us to have a call late tomorrow afternoon/ early evening - I’m flexible as to
timing, but it might be worth running through who’s doing what before Monday.

Jane

Jane MacLeod

Group Director Legal, Risk & Governance

Post Office

WBD_000075.000005
WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

From: Mark Underwood] <__
Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2019 9:17 pm

To: Jane MacLeod; Rodric Williams

Ce: andrew.parsons

Subject: RE: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal
Privilege

GRO _ j

Jane / Rod

Further to the below, I have now been through the judgment from a comms / stakeholder management lens,
pulling out:

Comments re the NFSP
Statements which will play in the secrecy / deceit narrative
The Judge’s observations on our witness evidence vs the claimants’

Inflammatory comments more generally.

I am only sending this to you two as I am not entirely sure whether I am yet able to circulate anything with
extracts from the Judgment just yet — but I hope this will prove helpful to Mel and Mark on Monday.
Themes in terms of the comment / ‘observations’ Judge Fraser has made include: POL being secretive;
sloppy in its operations; its evidence being driven through a PR Prism; its witnesses being blinkered in their
views / adopting a default position in their findings; and an undercurrent of sexism.

Please do forward on now to the copy list included on my below note (+Al who I omitted accidentally), if we
are able to?

Given the attacks made on some of POL’s witness evidence, we should speak to each of them as swiftly as
we can, once the judgment is handed down. Also, I know Nick Beal is planning to attend Court on Monday
and as such, the sooner we can brief SteerCo, the better — I think the note Jane sent to the Board on Friday
would be perfect?

I will continue to work on the attached tomorrow.

Mark

° Mark Underwood
Portfolio Director: Legal, Risk & Governance
Ground Floor

20 Finsbury Street
London EC2Y 9AQ

WBD_000075.000006
WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

2017 Winner of the
Global Postal mobite numbe:
Award for
Customer
Experience

From: Mark Underwood!
Sent: 08 March 2019 19:18
To: Jane MacLeod <
Melanie Corfield <
Brauer

GRO ; Julie Thomas <~ Zoe

kes. Ben Beabey _ SRO.

GRO _ >; 'Rodric Williams’

{ >; Angela Van-Den-Bogerd <i GRO 3
achel Scott’ :.. GRO a)

Subject: Common Issues Judgment: Instructions Table + Subsequent Actions - Subject to Legal Privilege

Importance: High

Dear all

Further to the exchange of emails todays on the Common Issues Trial Judgment, please find attached an
initial actions list which I think captures what everyone has fed in and is purposely simple. Further actions
and work will be required as advice is received from the lawyers but hopefully this will get the ball rolling.
Please do send me anything that I have missed.

There are a number of deliverables required before Monday, but necessarily so as they provide the
springboard for everything else (next steps, reporting, briefing papers etc). I will set up a meeting for first
thing on Monday (with dial ins for those not in FD) so that we can assess where we are, based upon the
advice which will be provided over the weekend.

Jane: can we please use the Chairman’s Office as a ‘base’?

Jane & Al: would you like David Cavender QC to come to GE on Monday / the Board call on Tuesday?
What are the timings of these meetings please?

Andy / Rachel: Can you please get the relevant instructions out to One Essex / your team. Please give me a
call to discuss anything in the attached table which isn’t clear.

Thanks all

WBD_000075.000007
WBONO0000205
WBON0000205

Mark

Mark Underwood
Portfolio Director: Legal, Risk & Governance
Ground Floor

20 Finsbury Street

2017 Winner of the ‘°7¢" £°7Y 942

Global Postal
Award for
Customer
Experience

Mobile number:

JS SIGE ICIS IASI IOI CI ASI CI CIOS CIOISI ICICI OEIC SESS ECACC ICICI II

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete
this email from your system. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the
sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: Finsbury
Dials, 20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.

ZS ESE SISSIES ISIS SEE SISSIES IES SIAR IACI KIC ICAI AC ocak ca A ok oa ak oe

“Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy. Information about how we do this can be
found on our website at www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy”

WBD_000075.000008
Previous Next

© Crown Copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Converted by Matthew Somerville.