WBON0000432 - Email from Andrew Parsons to Amy Prime Re: GLO Letter

Evidence on official site

From:

To:

Subject:

Date:
Importance:
Attachments:
Inline-Images:

WBON0000432
WBON0000432

"Parsons, Andrew" I
"Prime, Amy"
FW: GLO Letter

Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:16:36 +0000

High
045.Bates.our_letter_of_response.docx

image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.png; image004.jpg; image005.jpg; image006.jpg;
image007.jpg; image008.jpg; image009.jpg; image010.jpg

Andrew Parsons

Partner

Direct:

Mobile:

Follow Bond Dickinson:

Blin)

www.bonddickinson.com

From: Anthony de Garr Robinson [mailto:

Sent: 15 July 2016

12:39

To: Parsons, Andrew; Readhead, Tiffany; Loraine, Paul
Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

Importance: High

Dear all,

Here is where I have got to with the letter, working too fast and without checking things, proofreading or
even making a spellcheck. I have just about got to the end of section 8, although my review of everything
from section 7 was quite hurried.

WBD_000302.000001
WBON0000432
WBON0000432

T have not looked at the remaining sections of the letter but I have looked at the schedules and have many
proposed amendments for them. They are not huge amendments but they will improve the quality and avoid
some hostages to fortune. Do you want me to klet you have them? If so, I will not be able to turn to that
until after 3pm.

Let me know what you wat me to do. Please note that I expect to be out of circulation for almost the whole
of the weekend and much of the early part of next week. However, that may suit you!

Best wishes,

Tony

From: Parsons, Andrew [mailto . GRO
Sent: 14 July 2016 15:19

Readhead, Tiffany
GRO

Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

Tony
You do your amendments first and then we'll feed in anything else we have.

A

Andrew Parsons
Partner
Bond Dickinson LLP _

From: Anthony de Garr Robinson

Sent: 14/07/2016 14:59

To: Parsons, Andrew; Readhead, Tiffany; Loraine, Paul
Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

I’m not sure the nature of the proceedings are key — the key point for us may be that the tort of abuse of the
process (Crawford does not call it malicious prosecution) requires bringing proceedings for a purpose other
than the recovery of the money sought in the proceedings, which is clearly not our case and which they do
not even allege here.

Hold on, though — who’s currently in charge of the travelling draft?

WBD_000302.000002
WBON0000432
WBON0000432

From: Parsons, Andrew [mailto;
Sent: 14 July 2016 14:46
To: Anthony de Garr Robinson <__ )
{ GRO mi ine, Paul 4 GRO
Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284] ~

Tony
I was going to ignore it as they haven't put forward a case on this. May be we just add a footnote.

Paul. Would you mind addressing this point? I think you can only bring an MP claim for certain types of
civil proceedings, not all civil proceedings. Ask Amy, she might know the case law on this.

A

Andrew Parsons
Partner

Bond Dickinson LLP
Tel:

From: Anthony de Garr Robinson

Sent: 14/07/2016 14:27

To: Readhead, Tiffany

Ce: Parsons, Andrew

Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

Thank you, Tiffany.

Andy, is anyone proposing to deal with their argument that we are liable for malicious prosecution in relation
to the civil proceedings we have brought? For this purpose, they are relying on Crawford Adjusters v
Sagicor. Should the letter not be addressing the point?

Tony

From: Readhead, Tiffany [mailto?
Sent: 14 July 2016 14:06

To: Anthony de Garr Robinson
Ce: Parsons, Andrew <
Subject: RE: GLO Letter [

Afternoon

As requested, please find attached the updated version of the letter to Freeths.

WBD_000302.000003
WBON0000432
WBON0000432

Thanks

Tiff

Tiffany Readhead

Secretary

Bond Dickinson LLP

Direct: I

Office: I

Follow Bond Dickinson:

Blin

www.bonddickinson.com

PROUD TO SUPPORT

EXPORTING
IS

GREAT

BRITAIN & NORTHERN IRELAND

From: Parsons, Andrew

Sent: 14 July 2016 13:44

To: Anthony de Garr Robinson

Cc: Readhead, Tiffany

Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

Tony
Forgot to say. The letter hasn't changed much. Some work has been done to the Heads of Claim section.

Tiff. When you're finished making those changes I gave you, please could you send Tony the updated letter.

WBD_000302.000004
WBON0000432
WBON0000432

A

Andrew Parsons
Partner
Bond Dickinson LLP

From: Anthony de Garr Robinson
Sent: 14/07/2016 13:21

To: Parsons, Andrew
Ce: Porter, Tom
Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

He’s promised me this afternoon, I’m going over the other parts of the letter you sent me with my pen and
will have amendments to many parts. Would lunchtime tomorrow be too late for you? Has the draft
changed much since the version you sent to me? Where are you dealing with the remote data alteration
point?

From: Parsons, Andrew [mailto: GRO 7]
Sent: 14 July 2016 12:47
To: Anthony de Garr Robinson +
Ce: Porter, Tom ¢_
Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

Tony

Thanks.

We agree with your amendments. We'll tidy up the letter, chase down your questions and get this sent.

On the Comm Ct point, I agree that if this is to be even a viable option we need to do it in a transparent manner which
means setting it up in correspondence first.

Do you have an ETA on the sections you / Owain were amending on the LOR?

Kind regards
Andy

Andrew Parsons

Partner

WBD_000302.000005
WBON0000432
WBON0000432

Follow Bond Dickinson:

Blin

www.bonddickinson.com

From: Anthony de Garr Robinson [mailto}
Sent: 14 July 2016 10:24

To: Parsons, Andrew

Cc: Porter, Tom

Subject: RE: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]
Importance: High

Dear Andy,

Here are my suggestions for your letter. I hope they are self-explanatory. Given the time pressure, I have not
rigorously gone through the order to ensure that it all fits together on our case (that it should be in the
commercial court etc).

Tom’s suggestion really is brilliant. However, if we suddenly made an application to the commercial court in
an attempt to steal a march on the other side, this would go down very badly with both courts. I have added
some wording to the letter and have amended the Order in ways that are designed to provoke an unequivocal
response from Freeths that they will absolutely never agree to transfer. If and when that happens, and
depending on how they express themselves, we might have an opportunity to reply by saying something like
(1) the parties agree that there should be a GLO and it is now clear what the issues are because we’ve served
our letter of response, (2) it is also clear that we are never going to agree on forum, and that this is the most
urgent issue, and (3) we’ve considered how best to resolve that issue and it seems to us that the quickest and
most appropriate procedure is through an application for a GLO to be made by the commercial court, and (4)
obviously, the claimants will not be making this application but the defendant will and (5) the claimants can
expect to receive the necessary papers shortly.

I’m more than a little concerned that this could end up rebounding on us, but let’s decide once we’ve sent our
letter of response.

WBD_000302.000006
WBON0000432
WBON0000432

Best wishes,

Tony

From: Parsons, Andrew [mailto:
Sent: 13 July 2016 19:18

To: Anthony de Garr Robinson <
Ce: Porter, Tom
Subject: GLO Letter [BD-4A.FID26859284]

Tony

Please find attached a draft letter to Freeths and an amended GLO for your comments.

Tom P came up with an interesting, if slightly mischievous, idea on the issue of moving matters to the Commercial
Court. Both Claimants and Defendants can apply for a GLO at any time, even before a Claim is issued or served.
Post Office is therefore at liberty to apply to the Commercial Court for a GLO. The fact that Freeths have issued in the
QBD doesn't prohibit such an application.

Therefore, rather than try to transfer the QBD Claim to the Commercial Court, we could simply make our own
application to the Commercial Court for a GLO (which would include the usual direction that all claims be moved to the
Management Court ie. the QBD claim would be moved to the Commercial Court).

Too mad or worth consideration?

Andy

Andrew Parsons

Partner

Follow Bond Dickinson:

WBD_000302.000007
WBON0000432
WBON0000432

www.bonddickinson.com

Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?

The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential

this e-mail and any attachments. If you are not arobinsorg
Unauthorised use, dissemi

please notify andrew.parsong as soon as possible and delete any copies.
ion, distribution, publication or copying of this communication or attachmenis is prohibited and may be unlawful

files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmission, Bond Dickinson LLP accepts no liability for any loss or
which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.

Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Bond Dickinson LLP, is neither given nor endorsed by it,

This email is sent by Bond Dickinson LLP which is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wa
London Riverside, London, SEI 2AU, where a list of members’ names is open to inspection, We use the term pa
consultant who is of equivalent standing. Our VAT registration number is GB123393627.

under num!
iner to refer to a

0C317661. Our registered office is 4 More
nember of the LLP, or an employee or

Bond Dickinson LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

WBD_000302.000008
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

WBON0000432
WBON0000432

WBD_000302.000009