WBONO0000439
WBON0000439
From: "Parsons, Andrew" { GRO. i
To: Anthony de Garr Robinson
Ce: "Prime, Amy" {” GRO_
i GRO ]
"Gribben, Jonathan"
Subject: RE: Remote Access [BD-4A.FID26859284]
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:24:18 +0100
Importance: Normal
Ok. Speak later (that's if you can speak at all!). A
Andrew Parsons
Partner
Bond Dickinson LLP
Tel:
From: Anthony de Garr Robinson
Sent: 21/07/2016 08:33
To: Parsons, Andrew
Ce:
Subject: RE: Remote Access [BD-4A.FID26859284]
Thanks, Andy.
a GRO.
it looks like welll be speaking at 12.
ut should be back by 10am. So
Tony
-----Original Message-—---
From: Parsons, Andrew [mailto
Sent: 21 July 2016 07:58
To: Anthony de Garr Robi
Ce: Prime, Amy 7 : Gribben, Jonathan {
Subject: RE: Remote Access [BD-4A.FID26859284]
Tony
Fair enough.
Please find attached a re-worked version of the language - now more directly and transparently explaining how Post Office can
change branch accounts.
This re-draft draws a clearer distinction between:
1. The factual allegation that Post Office has been changing branch accounts and that this is the true reason for the shortfalls in
branches.
2. The allegation that Post Office concealed its capabilities in this regard - which, at the moment, only goes to the limitation point.
The second is the more difficult point to address. First, it is not yet 100% clear that the Super User access does affect branch
accounting, though this seems very likely. Second, the reason that Post Office made incorrect statements is that it relied on
confirmations from FJ (see attached email as an example). At some point, we may well wish to disclose the attached email in
order to show that Post Office did not "deliberately" mislead the Claimants. This will however need to be carefully managed with
Fujitsu. From a tactical perspective, this may be better done once Freeths have more accurately stated their case on concealment.
~}- would you be available
for a call at 9:30? If not, would 12 noon work?
WBD_000309.000001
WBONO0000439
WBON0000439
Kind regards
‘Andy
Andrew Parsons
Partner
Direct: f i
Mobile} GRO H
Follow Bond Dickinson:
From: Anthony de Garr Robinson [mailto:
Sent: 20 July 2016 20:55
To: Parsons, Andrew
Ce: Prime, Amy; Gribben, Jonathan
Subject: Re: Remote Access [BD-4A.FID26859284]
Dear Andy,
I've had a quick look at the drafting and I don't think it will wash, First of all, we appear to have ignored the second route by which
L understand it is possible for data to be altered remotely - the one that involves PO and has happened only once since 2010.
Second, we boldly say that they haven't given proper particulars of our concealment of the remote data alteration facility, but for
years virtually every document we submitted positively said that data could not be altered remotely. We need to say something that
at least provides a basis for explaining how we came to do this, even if we can't bring ourselves actually to acknowledge that we
have made false statements in the past and to explain why.
‘We must assume that this letter is going to be pored over for many hours at trial, at which time the court will know everything.
Attempting to brush this under the carpet to avoid short term embarrassment would do profound damage to our long term
credibility. In my view it would be the worst possible thing to do. It really is the case that in many cases cover ups give a much
worse impression and are much more serious than the things sought to be covered up (in this case, our previous inconsistent
statements).
It may well be that I have got the wrong end of the stick, but this drafting makes me very nervous indeed.
Talk tomorrow?
Tony
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 Jul 2016, at 20:06, Parsons, Andrew {77 SRO
wrote:
Tony
Please find attached the latest version of the letter - this hasn't materially changed since your amendments. I've highlighted in Blue
in the attached letter where these two sections on remote access will be fit in - see pages 22 and 45.
Kind regards
‘Andy
WBD_000309.000002
WBONO0000439
WBON0000439
Andrew Parsons
Partner
Direct:
Mobile:
Follow Bond Dickinson:
www.bonddickinson.com<http://www.bonddickinson.com>
-----Original Message-—---
From: Anthony de Garr Robinson [mailto‘
Sent: 20 July 2016 19:47
To: Parsons, Andrew
Ce: Prime, Amy; Gribben, Jonathan
Subject: Re: Remote Access [BD-4A.FID26859284]
Ok. I see it’s only a small section anyway. Could you send me the longer version you've taken it from? I don't want to read and
review it, I just want to get the context clear in my head
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 Jul 2016, at 19:42, Parsons, Andrew
fone nnn -
{ GRO
_.P>> wrote:
Push on - I'll sort out the fees.
Post Office loved our letter so we're in credit!
Andrew Parsons
Partner
WBD_000309.000003
WBONO0000439
WBON0000439
<image001_jpg><http://www.bondickinson.com/>
Follow Bond Dickinson:
<image002.jpg><https://twitter.com/Bond_Dickinson><image003..jpg><http://www. linkedin.com/company/3098928?trk=tyah>
www.bonddickinson.com<http://www.bonddickinson.com/<http://www.bonddickinson.com%3chttp:/www.bonddickinson.con/>>
From: Anthony de Garr Robinson [mailto’
Sent: 20 July 2016 19:16
To: Parsons, Andrew
Ce: Prime, Amy; Gribben, Jonathan
Subject: RE: Remote Access [BD-4A.FID26859284]
Dear Andy,
I'm more or less at my budget limit. What do I do?
Best wishes,
Tony
From: Parsons, Andrew [mailto:f GRO: a
Sent: 20 July 2016 19:05
To: Anthony de Garr Robinson
com%3cmailtos
Subject: Remote Access [BD-4A.FID26859284]
WBD_000309.000004
WBONO0000439
WBON0000439
Tony
Would you mind reviewing the attached wording on the remote access issues?
Having reviewed the Letter of Claim, the remote access point is only specifically raised in relation to limitation / s.32
concealment. It is not cited as a ground for (i) deceit or (ii) unwinding the settlement agreements - although it could in due course
be used for these purposes.
We have expressly referred to balancing transactions and Super User access in the attached, without drawing specific attention to
them. Is this transparent enough or should we go further?
Kind regards
‘Andy
Andrew Parsons
Partner
<image001 .jpg><http://www.bondickinson.com/>
Follow Bond Dickinson:
<image002.jpg><https://twitter.com/Bond_Dickinson><image003 .jpg><http://www.linkedin.com/company/3098928?trk=tyah>
www.bonddickinson.com<http://www.bonddickinson.com/<http://www.bonddickinson.com%3chttp:/www.bonddickinson.com/>>
Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?
The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged and protected by law.
arobinson(o ee = a a ——
> only is authorised to access this e-mail and any attachments. If you are not
arobinson@ ~ ~ GRO ee ~ eee i
WBD_000309.000005
WBONO0000439
WBON0000439
- GRO — a?
Seo as soon as possible and delete any copies. Unauthorised use, dissemination,
distribution, publication or copying of this communication or attachments is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmission. Bond Dickinson
LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus
checks before opening any attachment.
Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Bond Dickinson LLP, is neither given nor endorsed by it.
This email is sent by Bond Dickinson LLP which is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number
0C317661. Our registered office is 4 More London Riverside, London, SE1 2AU, where a list of members’ names is open to
inspection. We use the term partner to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant who is of equivalent standing.
Our VAT registration number is GB123393627.
Bond Dickinson LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http:/www.symanteccloud.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http:/www.symanteccloud.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http:/www.symanteccloud.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http:/www.symanteccloud.com
WBD_000309.000006
<_DOC_33380020(1)_DRAFT Letter of Response 16 July 2016.docx>
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http:/www.symanteccloud.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http:/Avww.symanteccloud.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http:/www.symanteccloud.com
WBONO0000439
WBON0000439
WBD_000309.000007