WBON0000662 - Email from Andrew Parsons to Tom Beezer and Amy Prime Re: Postmaster Litigation

Evidence on official site

WBONO0000662
WBON0000662

From: Andrew Parsons
To: Tom Beezer'_ GRO _s Amy Prime} _ GRO. !

Subject: RE: Postmaster Litigation - CONFIDENTIAL AND SUBJECT TO LEGAL PRIVILEGE
[WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:17:42 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: UKGI_briefing_Note_14-3-2019_v1.docx

Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; image 1643e4.PNG; imageObbcfl.PNG;
image9f3a84.PNG

T&A
My changes attached.

From a privilege perspective, it is easier to maintain privilege over an advice note to PO that is being shared with
UKGI, rather than a note to UKGI. The problem with a note to UKGI is they are not the lawyer's (Jane's) client and so
legal advice privilege does not apply. I think this would be a document prepared for the purpose of litigation, and
therefore attract litigation privilege, but it's not 100% clear cut.

So I've added Jane's name to the note to make clear that this is a lawyer's advice note. I've also added an intro para
to make the document provenance clear.

When it is sent to UKGI, it should be sent subject to the protocol and under an email that says something like...

The attached note and any associated communications contain privileged legal advice. They are being shared with
UKGI subject to litigation privilege and without waiving any right to assert legal privilege over these communications
against any other party.

And yes, privilege always trumps FOI.

A

Andrew Parsons
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.

‘Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts

WBD_000532.000001
WBONO0000662
WBON0000662

Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library

Book your place here

WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON @&) (in)

From: Tom Beezer

Sent: 14 March 2019 20:04

To: Amy Prime; Andrew Parsons

Subject: RE: Postmaster Litigation - CONFIDENTIAL AND SUBJECT TO LEGAL PRIVILEGE [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]

Primer
2Qs...:

Would Lit Priv not apply ? it is for dominant purpose of Lit...i.e., in the management of with major shareholder ? If Lit
priv does that trump FOI ? MUST do ????

And how soon do they need an OK ? Tonight ?

T

Tom Beezer
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP

Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts

Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library

Book your place here

WOMBLE
BOND
DICKINSON

WBD_000532.000002
WBONO0000662
WBON0000662

From: Amy Prime

Sent: 14 March 2019 18:56

To: Tom Beezer; Andrew Parsons

Subject: FW: Postmaster Litigation - CONFIDENTIAL AND SUBJECT TO LEGAL PRIVILEGE

Andy, TB
Attached is POL's proposed briefing to UKGI (shareholder) on the litigation.
TB - Dave is happy with this but given the importance please could give it a once over?

Andy - Ben B has raised a privilege query "/ know there's a framework around information sharing with UKGI —-my
immediate thought concerns the status of this document when it goes across in terms of privilege and restrictions from
subsequent disclosure by them under FO/?"

Would the framework protect the privilege over this document (some kind of commonijoint privilege)? Or does the
document become obtainable under a FOI?

Thank you both

Amy

Amy Prime
Solicitor
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.

GRO

Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts

Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library

Book your place here

WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com

BOND
DICKINSON (J) (in)

WBD_000532.000003
WBONO0000662
WBON0000662

From: Jane MacLeod [mailto:
Sent: 14 March 2019 11:19
To: Patrick Bourke; Mark Underwood1; Amy Prime

Cc: Ben Foat; Ben Beabey; Zoe Brauer

Subject: Postmaster Litigation - CONFIDENTIAL AND SUBJECT TO LEGAL PRIVILEGE

Patrick, Mark, Amy

Please see attached first draft of the ‘more detailed’ briefing to go to UKGI (legal and shareholder teams)
tomorrow and on the detail of the judgement. I have plagiarised (sorry Amy) large sections of the advice
from last weekend from WBD.

Please let me know if there is anything else we should say, or say differently?

Ben(s), Zoe — for information only, although I thought it might help with some context ...

Thanks,

Jane

Je SESSA ES GIS EGGS ES AEGIS GRCIIIGIGICR ACIICK AICI A ASAE ACC aca Rca A ko a ok

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete
this email from your system. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the
sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.

POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: Finsbury
Dials, 20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.

Je SESSA ESI ISIS EE SORES AEGIS ASIC ACI ICICK AGIA AICI AACR Aaa ocak ok acolo oak oe

“Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy. Information about how we do this can be
found on our website at www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy”

WBD_000532.000004