WBONO0000686
WBONO000686
From: Tom Beezer t
To: Jane MacLeo GRO !Amy Prime GRO I
Ce: Mark Underwood] ¢ GRO }, Rodric Williams
{ GRO +, Ben FoatI GRO I_Andrew
Parsons GRO } Dave Panaech
Subject: RE: Recusal application - draft documents [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 07:29:31 +0000
Importance: Normal
Inline-Images: imageedd7f1.PNG; image155c9b.PNG; image06c446.PNG; image001.png;
image002.png; image003.png
Jane
The answer to this Q gets into how the subject matter of the application is presented to the court and (most
importantly) what evidence can be given on in a witness statement. Points that go through my mind are as follows:
- We had initially done a much more fulsome w/s so I suspect our initial reactions are somewhat aligned
- Lord Grabiner initially wanted no w/s and wanted to develop the narrative through the content of the
Application Notice and mostly through oral argument. There are points in here about not wanting to give
Green too much advance notice and about Lord Grabiner's faith in his own advocacy
- The "test" or bar that we have to meet for bias (real or apparent) is:
o “whether the fair minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that
there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased" [Porter —v- Magill 2 AC 357, para 103]
- When looking at whether that test is met the court (and the Court of Appeal) will look hard at the procedure
adopted here. In other words the sequential trial structure and timings (and warnings given historically)
that have got us to this point. That is something a witness statement can deal with as it is "story". We can
set out (in short form) that narrative. Lord Grabiner's point is at one level you don't need to as it is all there
in the court records and transcripts — one just needs to point to it during oral argument. That debate has
been had, and the shorter witness statement you have seen is suggested to POL notwithstanding it gives
Green a partial roadmap to our complaint.
- The important point to recognise is that a witness statement can say nothing really about the witnesses
own view on whether the procedure adopted and what happened in the past amounts to bias as that is
opinion. It is the court that has to form the view that historic actions meet the test (see above) not the
witness. In this regard the court is the fair minded observer looking in. So the witness statement (and
application notice) do deal mostly with procedure and backstory as the overlay (put another way, the
second half of the argument) being "and so that must be biased" comes in oral argument to a degree but
really is the function of the court to make that conclusion and not the witness.
WBD_000556.000001
WBONO0000686
WBON0000686
One last non legal point — it is possible that once the recusal application is served it gets mentioned by the judge or
Green. That could theoretically occur today. Unlikely but possible. If it does get mentioned is POL Comms'/PR ready to
deal and brief both at court and more widely ?
Tom Beezer
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library
Book your place here
WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON ¥) (in)
From: Jane MacLeod [mailto:
Sent: 20 March 2019 23:29
To: Amy Prime
Cc: Mark Underwood1; Rodric Williams; Ben Foat; Andrew Parsons; Tom Beezer; Dave Panaech
Subject: Re: Recusal application - draft documents [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Amy
I have read these quickly and suspect that I have missed the point of the witness statement. Reading it
however suggests that The foundation of our claim is procedural unfairness. There is little about why we
believe that there is the potential for bias (I have not correctly stated the test).
Sorry ...
Jane
Jane MacLeod
Group Director Legal, Risk & Governance
Post Office
WBD_000556.000002
WBONO0000686
WBON0000686
From: Amy Prime!____._. GR
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019
To: Jane MacLeod
Ce: Mark Underwood1; Rodric Williams; Ben Foat; andrew.parsons; Tom Beezer; Dave Panaech
Subject: Recusal application - draft documents [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
3 pm
Jane
Please find attached the papers for the recusal application, on which we would welcome any comments. These are
subject to a careful proofread by us in the morning.
Application notice
Standard form document explaining at high level the order sought.
Draft Order
Order which Post Office will be seeking from the Judge (recusal and Horizon Trial to be adjourned)
Witness Statement
The witness statement has evolved to become a simple, concise document which introduces (i) structure of the
litigation; (ii) how the scope of the Common Issus Trial was set up; (iii) the dispute over admissibility of evidence; and
then from these draws a conclusion that the judgment made findings / observations which fall to be decided at future
trials and these findings give the impression that the judge has formed a view on these matters which will prevent him
from taking an impartial view in future trials.
We have been discussing with Counsel whether a witness statement was required, but a short statement has
been seen as a convenient method by which to provide the Court with the required information.
This also connects into the approach being taken with the skeleton. The skeleton will cover the law /
procedural matters but also itemise in more detail then the witness statement the paragraphs of the judgment
where the judge has offended the principles, with cross reference to how the judge set up these issues. A
shorter witness statements therefore prevents too much cross over with the matters to be dealt with in the
skeleton argument. Lord Grabiner would then also expand on these points in his oral submissions.
If there are any questions please let either Tom or me know.
Kind regards
Amy
WBD_000556.000003
Amy Prime
Solicitor
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library
Book your place here
WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
DICKINSON (J) (in)
Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?
WBONO0000686
WBON0000686
personal data is in our Privaey Policy, on our website.
"Jonly is authorised to
Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmission. Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP accepts no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP, is neither
This email is sent by Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP which is a limited liability partnership red in En
office is 4 More London Riverside, list of members’ names is oper
employee or consultant who is of equ tion number is GB123393627.
Our VAT
ven nor endorsed by it
mber 0C317661. O
(0 inspection. We use the term partner to refer to a member of the LLP, or an
d and Wales under n
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is a member of Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited, which consists of independent and autonomous law firms providing
services in the US, the UK, and elsewhere around the world, Each Womble Bond Dickinson entity is a separate I
nor can bind or ob!
www.womblebon
.on.comv/legal notices for further details.
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
JS SESSA ESI SISO EGGS SI AEGIS ICICI CISC R I ACIGICR AICI AC CASAC ACSA ocak acoA ok oa ok ok
al entity and is not responsible for the acts or omissions of,
nother Womble Bond Dickinson entity. Womble Bond Dickinson (Intemational) Limited does not practice law. Please see
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete
this email from your system. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the
sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: Finsbury
WBD_000556.000004
WBONO0000686
WBON0000686
Dials, 20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.
Js gE SISA ci dic or dci ici nici a cir RICA I CIC ACR ACI A ISK CAAA aa A coca ocak oo oe ok oe
“Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy. Information about how we do this can be
found on our website at www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy”
WBD_000556.000005