WBONO0000828
WBON0000828
From: "Parsons, Andrew" <:,
To: "'Simon.Clark voenennenncGRO
Ce: "Jamail A Singh ({ GRO : ;
Subject: FW: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not
for Wider Circulation [BD-4A.FID20472253]
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:37:45 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: Horizon_data_Lepton_SPSO_191320_CONFIDENTIAL.docx
Inline-Images: image002.jpg; image003.jpg; image006.jpg; image001.gif; image004.png; image005.jpg
Simon
Quick question — attached is the original Helen Rose report which appears to include an Appendix. Did the Appendix
go out as part of the disclosures? If not, why not?
Kind regards
Andy
Andrew Parsons
Senior Associate
for and on behalf of Bond Dickinson LLP
Follow Bond Dickinson:
Blin
www.bonddickinson.com
From: Rodric Williams [mailto{
Sent: 03 July 2013 09:53
To: Parsons, Andrew
Subject: Fw: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not for Wider Circulation
Andy - cam you pls take a look at this so you can give me an overview on the phone some time today.
Thanks Rod
From: Dave Posnett
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 04:19 PM
To: Rodric Williams
Subject: FW: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not for Wider Circulation
Rodric,
Any response to the email below yet?
Regards,
Dave Posnett I Accredited Financial Investigator
WBD_000698.000001
WBONO0000828
WBON0000828
2"4 Floor Banner Win;
148 Old St, London, EC1V 9HQ
Postlinef,
From: Dave Posnett
Sent: 14 June 2013 10:23
To: Rodric Williams
Cc: John M Scott; Dave Pardoe; Elaine Spencer; Helen Rose
Subject: Report: Lepton - Strictly Private and Confidential - Subject to Legal Privilege - Not for Wider Circulation
Rodric,
Please find associated a report from our Fraud Analyst, Helen Rose, in respect of Lepton SPSO. This office doesn’t
feature as part of our and Sight Spot Reviews, but the subject matter is Horizon (and indeed Credence) related. Could I
ask that you consider the report and feed any comments back, as it could be a potential issue at some stage.
In summary, the specifics concern a ‘system reversal’ of a transaction following a system failure. This is normal
practice, but the Horizon logs (and Credence logs) indicate that the reversal is an ‘existing reversal’, implying that the
reversal was manually entered by the clerk/Subpostmaster.
I think there’s a remote possibility that this could be a problem in terms of using the data for evidence/prosecution
purposes, but nevertheless it is still a possibility. Myself or Helen are happy to talk through anything that requires
explanation.
Regards,
Dave Posnett I Accredited Financial Investigator
24 Floor Banner Wing, 148 Old St, London, EC1V 9HQ
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named
recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have
received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete this email from your system. Any views
or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: 148 OLD STREET,
LONDON EC1V 9HQ.
WBD_000698.000002