From: Tom Beezer
To: Jane MacLeod <
Subject: RE: Update from the Board call - [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:28:41 +0000
Importance: Normal
WBONO0001785
WBON0001785
Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; image004.png; imagecf9cb0.PNG;
image193410.PNG; image090b7e.PNG.
Jane
No problem
When you know for sure I'll get things set up with OEC
Tom Beezer
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library
Book your place here
WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON
From: Jane MacLeod [mailtoi,.
Sent: 19 March 2019 16:14
To: Tom Beezer
Subject: RE: Update from the Board call - [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Tom
WBONO0001784_0001
WBONO0001785
WBON0001785
So far I have 2 takers so far but most likely to be a call rather than video conference at this stage. I’m still
waiting to hear from most of the Board!
Thanks
Jane
e Jane MacLeod
Group Director of Legal, Risk & Governance
Ground Floor.
20 Finsbury Street
LONDON
EC2Y 9AQ
Mobile number
From: Tom Beezer [mailto:
Sent: 19 March 2019 1
To: Jane MacLeod
andrew.parsons
>; Amy Prime <¢
Subject: RE: Update from the Board =a - [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Jane,
Latest from OEC:
Tom,
1 am afraid that Tony cannot step out of the meeting he already has. He has offered to speak to them
at 11.45 for 20 minutes if that will help.
Could that work for Post Office ?
WBONO0001784_0002
Tom Beezer
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.
‘Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
Join us for Disrupting Disputes 2.0
20 March 2019 at the British Library
Book your place here
DICKINSON ) (in)
From: Tom Beezer
Sent: 19 March 2019 09:27
To: ‘Jane MacLeod’; Andrew Parsons; 'Rodric Williams'
Cc: 'Mark Underwood}; Amy Prime; Ben.Foat
Subject: RE: Update from the Board call - [WBI
Jane
Current status re AGQC for tomorrow is:
Tom,
WBONO0001785
WBON0001785
Tony has another commitment at that time. I will speak to him to see what can be done.
Thanks
Rob
Robert Smith Direct dial:
Switchboard:
www.oeclaw.co.uk Mobile:
WBONO0001784_0003
WBONO0001785
WBON0001785
I am pushing OEC and will let you know where I get to.
From: Tom Beezer
Sent: 18 March 2019 19:45
To: 'Jane MacLeod’; Andrew Parsons; Rodric Williams
Ce: Mark Underwood! Amy Prime; Ben.Foat
Subject: RE: Update from the Board call - [WBDUK-AC.I 276696045)
Jane
On immediate task — I'll seek to get AGQC lined up for Weds’. I am on that now. If I hear from Rob at OEC tonight I'll
update you.
On the "thoughts on postcard point" more to follow tomorrow AM.
Good to meet you today
From: Jane MacLeod [mailto}
Sent: 18 March 2019 19:40
To: Tom Beezer; Andrew Parsons; Rodric Williams
Cc: Mark Underwood1; Amy Prime
Subject: Update from the Board call -
All
Many thanks for your help in sorting out DNQC attendance at the call. He was very balanced in his
approach, but confirmed that he thinks we have a good case on recusal. The Board asked a number of
questions and my sense was that they were ‘calmed’ by his discussion. However they haven’t yet made a
decision. There is a further board call on Wednesday at 12.30 and they have requested whether Lord
Grabiner would be available in person at the time — ideally at FD if that’s possible? Having said that they
recognise that he will almost certainly say the same things as DNQC.
WBONO0001784_0004
WBONO0001785
WBON0001785
So please pass on our thanks to DNQC.
There is significant pressure to be able to say how we are going to treat those claimants who establish they
have a case, and all those outside the scheme who may have a similar fact pattern. So what they have asked
for is a pro forma model of what the various outcomes could be — that is, what is the financial impact such
that taking a step like recusal is ‘worth it’.
It would be helpful to receive your thoughts on this but I think the following factors should be taken into
account:
Original Expectations (and what a recusal would help us get back to ....)
o contract would stand in all material respects
o Horizon would be found to be robust (no systemic issues; bugs may cause losses but these can be
identified and we would have a process to ensure that we didn’t attribute losses where the cause was
Horizon or a PO controlled factor
o Limitation would apply (reduces group by 50%)
o Normal basis of assessment of damages (contractual notice period 3/6 months, no compensation for loss
of office, other?)
o Would then look on a case by case basis — potentially repayment of amounts required to be made good,
maybe interest? other ‘reasonably foreseeable’ loss?
These principles would inform a settlement, and would also apply to all others (outside the GLO) who
sought relief
Post Common Issues:
More likely that:
¢ Horizon trial — risk of adverse findings re Horizon increases risk of breach
ewe will be in breach of a contract due to implied terms: failure to investigate, proving actual loss, and
‘burden of proof’ will be most material.
* can’t rely on branch trading statement in the event of disputed losses — so must wear impact of in branch
losses both historically and going forward. Currently c£S5m pa and growing
e greater damages due to longer notice period implied, and greater exposure to requirement to repay those
losses that we recovered (wrongly) from claimants (and others)
¢ Bias and ‘conspiracy theory re withholding evidence’ — will impact Limitation arguments
e Therefore greater numbers of postmasters within group and externally who could bring claim and greater
quantum of damages — whether through litigation or settlement
WBONO0001784_0005
WBONO0001785
WBON0001785
Additional factors — other than Recusal and appeal, costs of trials should not vary.
On a settlement (say over the summer) the fact (or not) of recusal and the Horizon outcomes will be key to
our negotiating strength. As it stands today, we would be in a worse position.
As ever, thoughts on the back of a postcard .....
Thanks
Jane
® Jane MacLeod
Group Director of Legal, Risk & Governance
Ground Floor
20 Finsbury Street
LONDON
EC2Y 9AQ
Mobile number:
AS ESE SISSIES IIS SSIES SISSIES AGES ASI ACI ICICI ICICI IGI IAI ACAI ACAI a A ok oa ak a
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email and then delete
this email from your system. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are solely those of the
sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office: Finsbury
Dials, 20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.
Js EGE III IES ACEC SIGS IGE ACSI GIORGI GI CIEI CI ACIGICI RIC ACACIA ACACIA AACE
“Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy. Information about how we do this can be
found on our website at www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy”
Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?
WBONO0001784_0006
WBONO0001785
WBON0001785
The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged and protected by law. “Jonly is authorised to
access this e-mail and any attachments. If you are not SRS. ‘please notify £ co is soon as possible and delete any copies.
Unauthorised use, dissemination, distribution, publication oF Copying of this communication or attachments 1s prohibited and may be unlawful, Information about how we use
personal data is in our Privacy Policy on our website
Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmission. Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP accepts no liabi
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
ity for
Content of this email which does not relate to the official busines
ss of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP, is neither given nor endorsed by it
This email is sent by Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP which is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number 0C317661. Our registered
office is 4 More London Riverside, London, SE1 2AU, where a list of members’ names is open to inspection. We use the term partner to refer to a member of the LLP, or an
employee or consultant who is of equivalent standing. Our VAT registration number is GB123393627,
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is a member of Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited, which consists of independent and autonomous law firms providing
services in the US, the UK, and elsewhere around the world. Each Womble Bond Dickinson entity is a separate legal entity and is not responsible for the acts or omissions of,
nor can bind or obligate, another Womble Bond Dickinson entity. Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited does not practice law. Please see
www.womblebonddickinson.com/legal notices for further details,
‘Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
WBONO0001784_0007