WBON0001975
WBON0001975
From: Amy Prime ¢.
To: "Matthew.Lenton
Ce: "pete.newsome,
Lucy Bremner
Subject: RE: KEL Index [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:52:33 +0000
Importance: Normal
Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; imagea71830.PNG; image39c732.PNG;
image4f2d27.PNG
Hi Matthew
Please could I check that the below wording accurately reflects your explanation?
1.1.1 The index named “Historc_Kels.xlsx” contains KEL entries which relate to Horizon.
1.1.2 The index named “Active_Kels.xlsx” contains KEL entries which relate to Horizon Online.
1.1.3. Both of these indexes contain those KEL entries which as at the date of the index were "live". The
consequence of this is that the indexes do not contain the deactivated KEL entries (as explained at paragraph
61.6 of Mr Parker's witness statement), or the deleted KEL entries (as explained at paragraph 61.9 of Mr
Parker's witness statement).
1.1.4. The KELs which were extracted and disclosed in March 2018 contained those entries listed in both
indexes, plus the deactivated entries. [But not the deleted KEL entries].
Kind regards
Amy
Amy Prime
Solicitor
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON ¥0O
From: Matthew.Lenton’ GRO. — I
Sent: 12 December 2018 16:30
To: Amy Prime
Ce: pete.newsome!
Subject: RE: KEL Index [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
jonathan Gribben; Lucy Bremner
WBON0001975
WBON0001975
Hello Amy,
I think the question is why does “Historic_Kels.xlsx” + “Active_Kels.xIsx” not equal the KEL extract of 21-
Mar-2018, the difference being in “KELs not in Index.xlsx”.
The answer is that “Historic_Kels.xlsx” is Horizon only and contains no post 2010 HNG-X KELs, while
“Active_Kels.xlsx” only includes live, ie. no deprecated or deleted KELs.
The KEL extract of March 2018 contains both Horizon and HNG-X KELs, both deprecated and non-
deprecated, but didn’t contain fully deleted KELs.
The fully deleted KELs were in the second extract that we provided on 05-Nov-2018.
I have asked the SSC team for the list of KEL entries which have been produced from 19 March 2018 to date.
Matthew Lenton
Post Office Account Document Manager
P&PS, Digital Technology Services
Fujitsu
Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN
Web: https://www.fujitsu.com/global/
From: Amy Prime! GRO
Sent: 12 December 2018 10:42
To: Lenton, Matthew!
Cc: Newsome, Petei._. 0.
i GRO Jonathan Gribben
Lucy Bremner
Subject: KEL Index [WBDUK-AC.FID26896945]
Hi Matthew
I hope you are well.
WBON0001975
WBON0001975
Back in January of this year you provided us with two indexes of the KEL, an historic and active index (both attached).
We have noticed that there are a number of KEL entries which were in the KEL extraction, but not contained within
either of these indexes — a list of these KEL entries is also attached.
From a brief review, the KEL entries which are not in either of these indexes have a wide date range between 1999
and 2018 so I don't think the entries were generated after the indexes were produced. Please could you have a look
into whether there is a reason that the extract contained more KEL entries then were listed in the indexes?
Separately, would you be able to provide us with a list of KEL entries which have been produced from 19 March 2018
to date?
Kind regards
Amy
Amy Prime
Solicitor
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
ign_up to our e-alerts
WOMBLE womblebonddickinson.com
BOND
DICKINSON Ain)
Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?
The information in this
nail and
s authorised to
any copies,
ful. Informationabout how we use
ail and any attachments is confidential and
‘hments. If you are not matthew.lenton}
ation, distribution, publ
Policy on our website
ccess this e-
thorised use, disse
personal data is in our
cation or copying of this communication or attachments is prohibited and may be u
Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmission. Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP accepts no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out yourown virus checks before opening any attachment.
Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP, is neither given nor endorsed by it.
This email is sent by Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP which is a limited li
office is 4 More London Riverside, London, SEI 2AU, where a list of mem!
employee or consultant who is of ur VAT registration numb
lity partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC317661. Our registered
names is open toinspection. We use the term partner to refer to a member of the LLP, or an
is GB123393627,
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is a member of Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited, which consists of independent and autonomous law firms providing
UK, and elsewhere around the world. Each Womble Bond Dickinson entity is a separate legal entity and is not responsible for the acts or omissions of
nor can bind or obligate, another Womble Bond Dickinson entity. Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited does not practice law. Please see
www.womblebonddickinson.com/legal notices for further details
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
WBON0001975
WBON0001975
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and
may be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it
is virus-free.