WITN02090100 James Withers - Witness Statement

Evidence on official site

WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

Witness Name: Mr James Withers
Statement No.: WITN0209_01
Exhibits: None

Dated 7 January 2022

THE POST OFFICE HORIZON INQUIRY

FIRST WITNESS STATEMENT OF MR JAMES WITHERS

I, MR JAMES WITHERS WILL SAY as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1. I am grateful to the Chair to be invited to provide a “human impact” statement,
concerning the physical, psychological, emotional, reputational and_ financial
consequences to me and my family of being held responsible for shortfalls shown by
the Horizon IT system and Post Office Limited’s actions toward me and my family.
The initial paragraphs below provide a brief summary of my background, and provide
context to the detail of the human impact of the Horizon scandal on me and my
family. This statement does not reflect a full account of my experiences or those of

my family and if necessary or required I will provide further witness statement

evidence.
BACKGROUND
2. I live with my wife in Suffolk. I have one child from a previous marriage and one step

child. Before I became a subpostmaster I was a licensed aircraft engineer. It was a

good job and! made a good living from it.

Page 1 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

3. I My wife (a care assistant) and I were working unsocial hours and would often not see
each other for days at a time. We decided to open a post office together for a change
of pace and to have more time together in the run up to retirement. My wife and I
liked the seaside town of Cromer and would often visit it, so we looked forward to
having a shop there. I looked forward to being at the centre of the local community

and engaging with people in my own shop.

4. My wife and I trusted the Post Office as an institution that we could do business with
to get a secure income. We got a business loan against our home to pay for the post
office branch, for which we paid £85,000. I was a subpostmaster of the post office at

15 Tucker Street, Cromer NR27 9HA from 19 July 2006 to 8 October 2008

5. I operated an additional retail business from the premises, selling cards and
stationary. I inherited three members of staff from the previous subpostmaster, as the
branch was sold to me as a going concern. Linda Farrow was my full time Manager and

I had two part time assistants — Wendy Rice and Pamela Day.

TRAINING AND SUPPORT

6. I received around four and a half days of training, approximately one month before I
took up my position, despite that I had been informed in my interview by David
Lusher that it would be a 10 day training course. Even during the training on Horizon,
I remember that my wife and I had encountered problems. One specific incident that
I recall was when we were carrying out a trial balance with the trainer telling us what
to do - we could not achieve a balance even on the training system. We were told
this was probably because we had inputted figures incorrectly or because the
systems were not connected to the main server as it was just a training Horizon
system. I was not at all convinced that we had inputted the figures incorrectly; it was

not a difficult task.

7: I recall that a trainer came into the branch over the first two weeks of my

appointment, then 2 more over the following 10 weeks, but never for more than 2

Page 2 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

days a week (although the initial trainers had assured us that it would be a full 10
weeks). I never had a trainer present for a monthly balance. I had a problem with
Horizon the first time that I tried to carry out an accounts balance with the trainer
showing me what to do as I had a £668.23 surplus. The trainer told me that this

would “sort itself out”.

The second week that the trainer was with us, I carried out an account balance and I
had a surplus of £65.96. The week later, I had a loss of £599.63. At the end of the
first trading period which was at the end of the month, I was £276.22 down. I could
not find any explanation for these losses and the post office trainer could not find

any explanation either.

The trainer told me that I should keep my own handwritten note of each balance
that I did as she said that I may need to refer to these notes later, and so I did keep
and still have a record of every balance. It seemed to me at the time that she said
this because she had very little confidence in the integrity of Horizon, the very
system that she had been training me on. She also told me that I should retain any

surpluses of cash as I could use these later to pay against any shortfalls.

The two new trainers who visited the branch were extremely unhelpful. Essentially,
they would stand over my shoulder as I worked on the Horizon system and argue
amongst themselves about the best way to deal with different transactions. I had no
confidence in them at all as they could not agree on the correct procedures that I
should follow. The training was wholly inadequate. After around 2-3 months of
opening the post office I decided to recruit another part time member of staff,
Rachel Craske, who had previously worked at a Crown Office. Rachel told me that to
even work as a Counter Assistant at a Crown Post Office she had undergone at least
6 weeks of training which is much more than I had received as subpostmaster — and

I was expected to run the entire business.

Page 3 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

11. As I became increasingly concerned about shortfalls, I asked the Post Office for
additional training. However, my area sales manager told me that no further training

was available.

APPARENT OR ALLEGED SHORTFALLS

12. I would estimate that throughout my position in the branch, I paid (or Post Office
deducted) in excess of £20,000 against shortfalls I experienced. I specifically recall

the following:

Shortfall 1

13, £1,244.74 on 13 September 2016. This shortfall was deducted from my wages over

the following 4 months. I settled this centrally so that the accounts balanced.

Shortfall 2

14. £4,987.16 on 11 July 2007. This shortfall was deducted from my wages. I settled this

centrally so that the accounts balanced.

Shortfall 3

15. Between £8,000 and £10,000 on 22 July 2008. This figure (which Post Office Ltd
altered on a number of occasions) was located at the final audit of the branch. I did

not deal with the accounts, as I was suspended on the spot.

16. If I had a loss, provided that the amount was not too much, say £200.00 or £300.00, I
would either take the money from my own savings to top up the cash in branch so
that it matched the figures that Horizon said it should be. For larger amounts I used

my credit cards or cash from the shop. Sometimes I was able to use retained

Page 4 of 11
17.

18.

19.

WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

surpluses to repay shortfalls, as the trainer had advised me to do, but this by no

means covered the full extent of my shortfalls.

As well as having weekly discrepancies on balances, there were particular products
that always caused an issue for me. For example, I never had any problems with tax
discs or selling stamps or dealing with state benefits but I did very frequently
encounter problems with Alliance & Leicester Giro bank cheques and with cheque
transactions generally. With the Giro bank transaction, customers came into the
branch with the Giro bank slip and the cash that they wished to deposit. I then
entered that amount onto Horizon, took the cash or cheque from the customer,
stamp the Giro bank slip and give that back to the customer. This was a fairly
straightforward process. However, on numerous occasions customers returned to

the branch to say that the transaction was not showing in their bank account.

On one particular occasion on 19 September 2007 I had returned from a two week

holiday. } (the couple I purchased the branch from) had been

running the branch in my absence. A customer that I knew well had told me that he

had deposited £400.00 which was not showing on his account. I asked i
whom had processed the transaction and she was sure that she had dealt with the
transaction correctly however as it was not showing on the customer's account I felt
that I had no option but to refund the customer as he had evidence that he had paid

this sum into us. This was something that happened quite often.

I also experienced repeated and large discrepancies with stamps, following a delivery
by a security guard. During these visits I also returned excess cash from the branch.
Each time I tried to carry out a balance check after one of these deliveries, I was left
showing a loss of thousands of pounds. Most of the time in the following two or
three weeks the minus balance evened itself out, but still left shortfalls of a couple of

hundred pounds each time.

Page 5 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

20. We received error notices, sometimes entirely at random from Post Office Ltd, often
a number of weeks or months after the event. It simply showed a plus or minus
figure being corrected, and I didn't know where to look for the transaction that
needed correcting. In these circumstances, I had to place the transactions into the

Suspense Account.

21. I also encountered numerous problems with the software and hardware at my
branch. The computers that we have been provided with by Post Office Ltd were
very old and slow. For example, when I completed the branch trading balances it
would take often around 1.5 — 2 hours for the information to be transmitted to Post
Office Ltd. The computers also used to crash on a regular basis and would just freeze
in the middle of a transaction and so it was difficult to know if that transaction had
gone through or not. A Post Office Ltd IT Engineer did visit my branch to install some
new printers in or around Summer 2007 and I asked him if there was any possibility
of the computers software and hardware being updated given the persistent
problems we were having with the system crashing. He told me that the computers

could not be changed.

HELPLINE

22. I contacted the Helpline 2-3 times a month. The helpline was most unhelpful. I only
used it when I had significant issues failed to recognise a transaction, but it was clear
that the helpline members were just reading their responses from the manual and
they couldn't actually explain why I was having the problem complained of. This
meant that I could not make attempts to prevent it from happening again.
Sometimes the helpline reading from a script worked, but mostly it did not. The
standard answer was "It will sort itself out" or just look at the print out it is all on

there “which was entirely unhelpful.

23. On 12 December 2006 I rang the helpline and told them that my system was showing

a shortfall. I passed the helpline's instructions on to a colleague who was sitting at a

Page 6 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

terminal. Once the helpline had walked us through the recommended procedure for
resolving the issue, the loss previously shown had doubled from £2,486.76 to
£4,973.53. The helpline member told me that the issue would "sort itself out". It
never did. During the final months of my appointment I reduced my calls to the

helpline as they just could not assist with the shortfalls and often made matters

worse.
AUDIT AND INVESTIGATION
24. I can clearly remember one audit taking place. The Post Office carried out its first

ever audit on my branch on 22 July 2008. Two or three Auditors attended without
any prior warning in the morning and asked me to open the branch. They never gave

me a reason for the audit.

25. At the conclusion of the audit I was told that there was a shortfall of £8,200.00, then
within the hour they carried out a further audit and told me that there was a

shortfall of £8,900.00.

26. The Auditor telephoned the Post Office Ltd Area Manager for the Southern region,
Elaine Ridge, and passed the phone to me to speak with her directly. She told me,
very abruptly, that I had committed fraud and was suspended and that I should hand
over my keys to the Auditor. She also said "/ have a lot of this going on right now and
I don't need this". Ms Ridge told me that I was not allowed to take any documents

with me (although I refused this), and I handed over my keys to the auditors.

27. I was led to believe that an investigation was being carried out, however I now know
that this was not the case. After an interview with my area manager, Alan Lusher (at
which I was advised to reign), I learnt that there was apparently an investigation
being carried out. This interview had been recorded and later I made a Freedom of
Information request for the recording and details of the investigation. I was informed

that the recording no longer existed and that an investigation had not been carried

Page 7 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

out as a result of my bankruptcy. However, I was not declared bankrupt until 10

months after I was suspended.

SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION

28. I was suspended by the Post Office on 22 July 2008 in relation to alleged shortfalls of
£8,900. I then received a letter from Post Office Ltd which adjusted the alleged
amount due to £8,946.70. I was later informed that the shortfall was apparently

£9,375.45.

0

29. The branch was not closed. I asked the previous owners Mr and Mrs to act as

interim subpostmasters, which they did.

30. The keys were taken from me the day of suspension and I was barred from going

behind counter.

31. I resigned because I was advised by the Post Office at an interview relating to my

suspension, that it would be the easiest option, particularly as the Post Office knew

that I was in discussions with a potential buyer of the branch, M i I I therefore
gave my resignation on 8 October 2008, but POL said that it would take effect from
22 July 2008. I was 'reminded' by Post Office Ltd that I still needed to make good any

shortfalls as well as any further deficiencies found.

32. I did not receive payment of a notice period after my resignation.

33. In or around May 2008, which was 2 months prior to the audit of my branch, I was

approached by Mri. who owned a local Budgens supermarket which

is on the same road as the Cromer branch. Mr informed me that he was

refurbishing his supermarket and he wanted to buy the post office to have in his

store.

Page 8 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

34, By this time I had spent so much money on paying shortfalls to Post Office Ltd that I
was very keen to sell the post office as soon as possible as I simply could not afford

to keep running it. At the time of my suspension I was in negotiations with Mr

but after I was suspended I heard nothing further from him and my

telephone calls to him remained unanswered.

35. I recall that after around three months after I resigned in or around January 2009, a
post office was opened in the Budgens supermarket. During my period of

suspension, in or around August or September 2008 I had already seen post office

counters in packaged boxes in Mri store so I believe that the arrangement
for him to take over the post office had been agreed long beforehand by Post Office

Ltd and before I had even resigned. I was left with no business to sell and I have

never received any payment from Mri_. r Post Office Ltd.

HUMAN IMPACT

36. The Post Office’s actions caused enormous financial impact on me. I had to repay
£20,000 in shortfalls and, in the end, I lost the value of my investment in the
business when I was forced out. I also suffered significant financial impact through
lost wages during my suspension and when I was suspended as an SPM, and

thereafter effectively forced to resign.

37. The loss of my Post Office has impacted my financial standing now as I could have
been carrying on a profitable business, instead I had to seek employment and

receive less pay than I otherwise would have.

38. All my wife's and my savings went to pay off our debts. I sold a car and put my credit
cards up to the limits. I also had to do night work to help pay wages and bills due to
the losses and also worked during the afternoon, which was really difficult. I had to

take up a job in Gatwick airport 125 miles away from my home just to keep afloat.

Page 9 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

39. Because of my debts, which amounted to £320,000, I had to apply for bankruptcy in
2009. My home was repossessed by the bank and they sold it at a significant loss. I

now live in rented accommodation.

40. I also suffered reputational damage. There was much gossip in my local community
about me having stolen from the Post Office which was very hurtful. I lost friends
who didn’t believe me. I could not step into town because people would stare at me,
and I could not face going out, where previously I had been sociable. Where I had
once been the centre of my community I became a pariah and acquaintances would
avoid me. I recall once someone approached me at a funeral of a friend to ask if I

was a thief.

41. The stress from my financial difficulties seriously impacted my health. I suffered
severe weight loss as I was not eating properly, and I had difficulty sleeping. I had a

constant worry of being prosecuted and going bankrupt.

42. My wife was very affected by stress over our finances and her health was more
affected than mine and I believe she nearly suffered a breakdown. My child and step
child also worried a great deal about us, and we have been unable to provide for
them in the way that we planned. Working 125 miles away from my home was very

difficult for my wife and I as we could not see each other.
CONCLUSION
43. The Post Office’s actions caused financial ruin for me and my family. The Post Office
caused us to lose our home and all financial security. Our reputation was destroyed

and our health was affected. The Post Office must give full reparation for all what we

have suffered.

Page 10 of 11
WITNO2090100
WITNO2090100

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe the contents of this statement to be true.

Page 11 of 11