WITN02700100 Kevin Palmer - First Witness Statement

Evidence on official site

Witness Name: Mr Kevin Palmer
Statement No: WITN0270_01
Exhibits: None

Dated: 3.2.2022

THE POST OFFICE HORIZON IT INQUIRY

FIRST WITNESS STATEMENT OF MR KEVIN PALMER

I, MR KEVIN PALMER WILL STATE as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1. I am grateful to the Chair to be invited to provide a “human impact” statement,
concerning the physical, psychological, emotional, reputational and _ financial
consequences to me and my family of being held responsible for shortfalls shown by
the Horizon IT system and Post Office Limited’s actions toward me and my family.
The initial paragraphs below provide a brief summary of my background, and provide
context to the detail of the human impact of the Horizon scandal on me and my
family. This statement does not reflect a full account of my experiences or those of

my family and if necessary or required I will provide further witness statement

evidence.
BACKGROUND
2. lam from Essex and I live Benfleet.
3. I live with my wife, RO We have been married for 16 years and we have two

daughters together who also live with us.

4. Prior to my appointment as Subpostmaster I had a thriving career in the city of
London, I was working in investment banking, and I had done this since leaving

college.
Page 1 of 19
5. I worked in the financial services industry for about 8 years. For 4 of those years I
worked at Deutsch Kreditbank AG (DKB) and for the other 4 years I worked at
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (SEB).

6. I also spent one year working in Taiwan as a financial advisor.

Ts It was not my intention to leave investment banking, at the time I had just been
headhunted by a large Russian bank, and I was planning to go and work for them.

8. My Mother, Suzanna Palmer, is a core participant in this Inquiry. She was a
Subpostmistress and she had been suspended from her branch due to the shortfalls
and problems with Horizon, so I left my career and job in the city to support my
mother and take over her branch.

DECISION TO BECOME A SPM

9. Following my Mothers suspension by the Post Office, I wanted to help her out and
they suggested that I take over the Subpostmastership, and that is what I did. It was
a very straight forward process, I simply had to fill out some forms.

10. At the time, my mum and I were both under the impression that she would be
reinstated. So when I took over the post office I was under the impression that it was
just temporary, and in order to help my mother.

11. However, that is not how it turned out.

12. I gave up everything I had built in my career to help my mum, I even bought the post
office from her to help her out financially.

13. I was a Subpostmaster of The Grange Post Office, 105 London Road, Rayleigh, Essex

SS6 9AX from on or around 1 February 2007 to 14 April 2016.

Page 2 of 19
14, I operated a retail business from the premises. I also operated a newsagents from
the premises. This was owned by my Company, First Class News Limited; and I
employed four assistants.

15. There was a linked residential premises at the branch, and I let this out and received
£695.00 per month in rent.

TRAINING AND SUPPORT

16. My appointment started after the initial introduction of Horizon. I did not receive
any training from the Post Office, my mum trained me in the post office as she was
the previous subpostmistress.

17. I remember attending one meeting where I was told to sell a book of stamps but I
never had any training from the Post Office on balancing or how to operate the
branch.

HELPLINE

18. I contacted the helpline roughly once a week, mainly on balance nights regarding
problems relating to alleged shortfalls and balancing.

19. Generally, the advice from the Helpline when I called querying alleged shortfalls on
balancing was "don't worry it will come back as a transaction correction".

20. On some occasions, I did receive transaction corrections. However, these would

often come through some 8-10 weeks later and so it was impossible to understand

what they related to.

Page 3 of 19
21.

22.

The Helpline were not able to resolve any of the problems. The help they provided
was simply reading from a booklet, the same booklet that I had in the branch that

showed you how to do a transaction.

I felt that I was being 'fobbed off' whenever I called and I do not think that the

Helpline advisors were knowledgeable of the system at all.

SHORTFALLS

23.

24,

25.

26.

27.

28.

In this section, I set out in very brief detail my experience of shortfalls arising from
deficiencies in the Horizon IT System, and Post Office Limited’s actions as a result.
This is only a brief introduction to those matters, in order to provide necessary

context for the explanation of the human impact which follows.

Over the period of my tenure I paid, or the Post Office deducted in excess of
£20,000. When I performed a weekly balance, the system would regularly show an

alleged shortfall.

This happened at least twice a month, every month. I often called the Helpline to
seek assistance with the balance but they were of little to no assistance. On every

balance I checked through my own records, sometimes I would sit on the floor until

12am in the morning looking thorough receipts to find the errors.

For the smaller shortfalls, ranging from £100.00 - £200.00 I would always make the
difference good in cash immediately. I would estimate that I paid roughly in excess

of £15,000.00 in relation to these smaller discrepancies.

The errors that I had would always show either immediately before, or after I had

performed a trading period balance.

The following shortfalls are examples of larger discrepancies that I encountered in

the branch though this is not an exhaustive list of shortfalls that I suffered.

Page 4 of 19
29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

In or around August 2007 a shortfall arose amounting to £2,700.00. I paid the Post
Office this alleged shortfall by way of deductions from my remuneration because the

Post Office maintained I had to pay the amount back.

I experienced a much larger shortfall amounting to £62,084.01. I did not pay the Post

Office for this shortfall.

This alleged shortfall showed on the system when I conducted a trading period
balance. I called the helpline in an attempt to find out why this figure was so large.
The helpline advisor told me that is was not possible for this to be a result of a

system error, and simply advised me to check my figures again.

I looked through my own records again, but could not find any error or any
explanation for this discrepancy. I started to panic, as I knew what had previously

happened in my mother's case at the same branch.

I did not have this kind of money to put into the branch cover such a larger shortfall;
I therefore, had no choice but to "settle centrally" in order to continue trading the

next day.

I hoped that this would be identified as an error and that it would "come back" as a
transaction correction. However, this shortfall appeared on every subsequent weekly

balance.

On each weekly balance, I called the Helpline in the hope that they would assist, but
each time I was just told to check my own records and that it might "come back". I
did not hide the discrepancy; I declared it every time, hoping that I would eventually

receive a transaction correction to resolve the problem.

I was extremely concerned about this shortfall and all I kept thinking was that Post

Office were going to do the same to me as they had done to my mother (i.e. take me

to Court and prosecute me).

Page 5 of 19
37.

38.

39.

40.

41.

The shortfall remained unresolved for a long period of time, to the point where it
exceeded the 60 day branch reporting period, which meant I could no longer access

any transaction records my end.

When the auditors attended my branch on 20 November 2015, as expected, they

discovered the alleged discrepancy.

The Post Office demanded that I "repay" this allege "debt" on a number of occasions
by way of letter (for example letter of termination dated 14 April 2016 and more

recently draft agreement of release July 2017).

After my suspension (following the audit of 20 November 2015) my staff continued
to experience alleged shortfalls in the branch under the appointed temporary

Subpostmaster.

My mother, Suzanne Palmer had also experienced similar unexplained shortfalls
prior to my appointment. This pattern of problems, despite a change of operator,
brings in to question whether there were wider problems in the branch, including in

the system.

Audit and investigation

42.

43.

Approximately 6 months in to my appointment, the Post Office conducted an audit
of my branch in or around August 2007. At the end of this audit, I was informed that

a shortfall of £2,700.00 had been discovered (the one referred to above).

The auditors explained that this shortfall related to scratch cards and went back 3
years. This would have meant that the shortfall occurred before I was even in
position. However, Post Office maintained that I had to pay the amount back. This

sum was deducted from my remuneration over several months.

Page 6 of 19
44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

51.

Following this audit, I made a complaint about one of the auditors. She came back to
my branch under the pretence of doing a "cash deck audit" but it was clear that she

was just being nice wanting me to give positive feedback and revoke my complaint.

The Post Office conducted a second audit of my branch on 20 November 2015. Two
auditors attended the branch (one being the auditor I had previously raised a

complaint about), I was not present at the branch when the auditors arrived.

I was at home, as I had taken the day off to look after my children. It took me a

couple of hours to arrange childcare but I got to the branch as soon as I could.

When I arrived, I immediately told them about the approximate £60,000.00
discrepancy that I had been experiencing in the hope that they would help me
resolve it. My first comment to the auditors was "good, you have come to solve my

discrepancies I hope".

After I informed them of the shortfall the auditors looked at each other and
contacted the police, Post Office security team and head office before I even had a
chance to explain what I thought had happened. They suspended me before they

had even stepped foot in the Post Office to conduct the audit.

The auditors threatened that I would be looking at 10-15 years in prison if I could not

make good the losses straight away.

I was told that my contract was suspended and they asked me if I could make good
the alleged loss immediately to avoid prison. I panicked and called my father in law. I
was hyperventilating as all I could think about was what had happened with my

mum and that I would not see my wife and children again.

I was ordered to stand at the back of the office whilst the auditors counted the cash
and stock. I was told to stay where I was. I was never given the opportunity to count

or validate any of their findings.

Page 7 of 19
52.

53.

54.

55.

56.

57.

58.

59.

Before the auditors left, they balanced the "cash" amount in the system. They took
the keys to the safe and I was only able to access the retail side of the business from

this moment onwards. I therefore, had no access to the branch overnight.

The auditors returned the following Monday (23 November 2015) in order to hand
over the branch to the temporary Subpostmaster. When they performed the

balance, the system showed a further £200.00 shortfall.

This was impossible as I was locked out of the branch. This shows that the Horizon

System was clearly flawed.

Neither I, nor any staff, had access to the Horizon system or the branch for that
matter after the auditors left on 20 November 2015 and yet an alleged shortfall had
appeared. The auditors could not explain this but insisted that I signed something

saying that this additional £200.00 would be added to my outstanding balance.

I disputed this and said that the system must be flawed. The auditors provided no

comment on this and seemed to ignore my concerns.

I have seen no records of any adequate investigation being carried out despite the
fact that I was assured, and believed, that an investigation was being conducted at

the time.

Despite my numerous calls to the Helpline seeking help (particularly in relation to
the larger shortfall), Post Office never visited my branch. My Area Manager never

visited the branch and there was no support system.

Following my suspension, I was invited to and attend an interview under caution
with Post Office investigators (letter from Matt Mowbray, Security Manager, of Post
Office dated 4 January 2015). I instructed a criminal solicitor who accompanied me

to this interview.

Page 8 of 19
60.

61.

62.

63.

64.

65.

66.

67.

I was then invited to attend a further "informal" meeting with my Contract Manager,
Carol Ballan. I attended this meeting on 27 January 2016 at Dartford Crown Office.
My criminal solicitors recommended that I contacted the NFSP and ask for a

representative to attend the meeting with me, which they did.

My criminal solicitor told me not to speak about the accusations that Post Office had
made against me, as the meeting should only concern the future of my contract.
When we arrived for the interview, the NFSP representative went in first and spoke

with Carol alone. I was left outside.

The NFSP representative then told me that I should resign as Subpostmaster as it

would "protect" me.

Although Ms Ballan wanted to tape the meeting, I refused as I felt that this was not
the purpose of the meeting. During the meeting, Ms Ballan kept accusing me of

stealing the alleged shortfall money and asked me when I was going to admit it.

The NFSP representative did not intervene, despite this accusatory line of
questioning. He did nothing to protect me. I remained strong and repeated the
advice of my criminal solicitor stating that the accusations were not what the
interview was about. Carol got very angry and started shouting at me, which was
very intimidated. She shouted that I "had to" tell her where the money was. I was

not going to accept this behaviour so walked out of the meeting.

I was very disappointed with the 'support' from the NFSP and it seemed that they

were just there to support Post Office, rather than me.

I attended a further interview at Chelmsford Post Office on 28 January 2016 where I
gave explanation. I also raised concerns over the Horizon system and said that I

believe that the system may have caused losses at my branch.

In the Post Office’s letter of termination addressed to me, dated 14 April 2016, the

Post Office dismissed this and merely stated that it "rejects this unsupported
Page 9 of 19
68.

69.

70.

71.

allegation" and that: "Horizon is used by 11,500 branches currently as around 78,000
registered users and is used to process 6 million transactions every day. It is
consistently subject to independent audits and meeting or exceeds industry

accreditations".

Post Office, through their legal representatives, started to negotiate an "agreement

and release" with my instructed solicitors, at the time.

Under this draft agreement, it was proposed that I repaid the alleged "debt" of
£62,084.01 and in return Post Office would agree not to pursue any civil or criminal

proceedings against me.

I very nearly entered into this agreement, as I was so worried about what Post Office
would do to me. I could not bear the thought of being sent to prison and not seeing

my children, even though I knew I had done nothing wrong.

However, prior to signing this agreement I learnt of the civil litigation with Freeths
LLP and found the strength to dispute the alleged outstanding sum. Freeths LLP

confirmed that I would not be entering into this agreement.

Suspension and Termination

72.

73.

I was suspended immediately following the audit of my branch on 20 November

2015 due to the alleged shortfalls at my branch.

The Post Office immediately asked me to pay back the shortfall of £62,084.01. I
completely panicked, as I did not have this sort of money so I called my father in law,
knowing he might have the sums and he immediately came down to the post office.
He asked the auditors for more information if he was going to consider handing over
the money but the auditors refused to give him any details. As such he did not not

pay the money on my behalf.

Page 10 of 19
74.

75.

76.

The branch was closed during the audit on 20 November 2015 and it was reopened
on 23 November 2015 when Interim Enterprises in Sheffield were appointed as
temporary subpostmaster. My staff however, took on all duties and responsibilities
of running the branch. The auditors took the keys to the safe and I could not access

records in my branch, my staff could but I wasn't allowed in the post office area.

My contract was terminated by Post Office. I was advised to resign by my NFSP
representative. He said that this would "protect" me. Following his advice, I

tendered my resignation with immediate effect by letter dated 7 March 2016.

I received a letter dated 14 April 2016 from Post Office stating that they did not
accept my resignation, as my contract did not allow me to "terminate my
appointment with immediate effect". The letter however, went on to terminate my

contract with immediate effect on 14 April 2016.

and Criminal Proceedings

77.

78.

The Post Office did not pursue civil or criminal proceedings against me for recovery

of the alleged shortfalls.

However, the Post Office have accused me of criminal offences and I had to attend
an interview under caution shortly after my suspension. The Post office
representatives, including the auditors, threatened that I would be prosecuted and

put in prison.

HUMAN IMPACT

79.

I was the subject of an audit by Post Office Ltd, in which shortfalls were found and

subsequently I was suspended from my position as subpostmaster.

Page 11 of 19
80.

81.

82.

83.

84.

85.

86.

87.

I participated in the mediation scheme and received £52,000. I was a party to the
group litigation against Post Office Limited; and as a result, I am excluded from the

Historic Shortfall Scheme.

Had it not been for the events that occurred, my future plans in my role were to
remain in position as Subpostmaster, and continue building the business and its

reputation.

Prior to my appointment as Subpostmaster, I worked and had a good career in
London. However, following my mother's termination as Subpostmistress and the
destruction that those events had on my family, as the older sibling I felt it was my
duty to return home to help and protect my family. Despite this not being my

intended career path, I loved my job as Subpostmaster.

I wanted to purchase the freehold of the premises and would have used this as an
investment for my pension. I had plans to expand the retail business into a card and
gift shop. I loved my job and really felt I had found my niche. I loved serving my

community and working to grow the business.

During my appointment I was so pleased to be offered the mains model under the
Network Transformation programme as I thought that this was going to take the

business to new strengths.

In fact, prior to the events leading to my termination, Post Office had approached me
to discuss opportunities of taking on other branches in my area. At the time, I declined
but it gave me confidence that I was ‘doing ok’. I certainly intended to remain in post

until retirement (i.e. 65 years of age, a further 28 years).

The consequences of being required to cover shortfalls were that it made working and

living a lot harder.

My stress levels were so high. We balanced the office every day and as a busy office, it

was always in the back of my mind that no matter how cautious and careful we were I

Page 12 of 19
88.

89.

90.

91.

92.

93.

94,

95.

96.

would be ‘down’ on the books and then have to put in cash to make good the fictitious

losses.

I felt awful for even questioning whether my staff could be stealing. They were not
stealing, but I could not help having these things go through my mind. They were my
team, and we had worked together for years and there were never any losses on my

retail side so why were they only in the post office side.

The team worked both areas of the business and I knew they were not taking any

money.

The stress was unbelievable and it was not nice for my family, my staff or even my

customers.

We had to rein in our budget and give up some of our luxuries. I had to give up my
season ticket which was my only down time from the shop and we had to stop sending

our children to kids club.

I was having to take money out of the retail side of the business to put into the Post
Office, and I ended up having to work longer hours I couldn’t afford to pay staff. This

meant I was losing out on spending quality time with my family.

I had to borrow money to cover the shortfalls.

As we lost the Post Office salary, we ended up having to take out loans and re-

mortgage the house in order to stay afloat and keep the business going.

I am now on a debt management plan and my credit rating is at zero.

When it was alleged that I was responsible for the shortfalls I was suspended with
immediate effect, and I was told I would go to jail for 10- 15 years for stealing money

from a government company and that I would lose everything.

Page 13 of 19
97.

98.

99.

100.

101.

102.

103.

104.

105.

Upon hearing this, I blacked out. I could not breathe, my life, my children and my wife

flashed before my eyes. I felt numb.

I was told by the Post Office to keep my shop side open and that the Post Office would
put a team of people in the post office to keep it running. I had to open up the

following day and pretend everything was normal.

The Post Office told me if I cooperated until the police enquiry they would make sure
it was noted I was helping. I had to stand in my shop and everyone ask me what was
going on. I was told I could not say a thing. I had done nothing wrong but I was made

out to be a criminal without any chance to address any issues.

I cannot put into words what that does to a person.

My family's reputation in this business had already been tarnished, due to the way
that Post Office treated my mother. It took a long time for the community to believe

my mother, even though she was found not guilty at trial.

I left my job and career in London in order to prove my family's innocence and build
our reputation back up. During my appointment I established good relationships with
my customers and built our reputation back up, in fact people bypassed other offices

to use mine.

However, this completely changed after my suspension and termination.

I was the face of the branch, however even after I stopped working there yet again

rumours about my family, and me, began to circulate amongst the community.

My reputation was in ruins. There was a hate campaign created about me on social
media. They accused me of being a thief and a liar and to everyone to boycott my
shop as I was still running the retail side. I had to take this abuse day in and day out

from people in the community.

Page 14 of 19
106.

107.

108.

109.

110.

111.

112.

113.

114,

115.

116.

I had people shout at me, vandalise my shop, spit at me and verbally abuse my wife

and children.

I had someone walk in my shop and shout out that I should be in jail in front of my

daughter who was behind the counter with me at the time. It was awful.

To add fuel to the fire, the Post Office took the post office out of my store and moved
it three doors down, so not only was I having to put up with abuse, I also had to keep

working knowing the office was just down the road from me.

I was treated as guilty until proven innocent in the community because they thought I

had stolen their money from the Post Office.

My wife was my rock throughout this whole experience, and she encouraged me to
keep going. Her logic was that if I was still behind the counter and people could see
my face then I could not have been guilty of theft because I would have been sent to

prison.

After about 2 years of taking the abuse and trying to keep the retail business running

people stopped coming into the store and business started going under.

I became so depressed I stopped going into the shop. As the business was failing, we
eventually decided to remodel the premises, and my wife and father in law helped me

turn the business into an events company and start over.

I would always get someone saying do not use my shop, and people still think I am a

thief and that I used the money to start a new business.

We have since closed the events business.

I think I will have to live with people believing I am a thief until the day I die, but I do
hope that one day they see this inquiry on the news and realise they were wrong

about me.

The accusations against me took me into some of the darkest days of my life.

Page 15 of 19
117.

118.

119.

120.

121.

122.

123.

124,

125.

126.

I became extremely depressed and suicidal.

My close friends and family have noticed that my personality and mannerisms have
changed drastically; I am not the same. Initially I was unable to leave the house due to

my vulnerable mental state.

I actually contemplated suicide. On one occasion, my wife found me wandering along

a busy motorway in a daydream and she had to drag me into the car before I got hurt.

It nearly cost me my marriage but my wife has been a rock. The effect that this has
had on me is still ongoing and although I feel stronger mentally, I am not the same

person and do not think I ever will be.

My life has been ruined. I have lost all my confidence and my self-worth hit rock

bottom.

We had a thriving business, I was well known in the community having always lived in
the area and being involved with the locals. We were known for our charity work and
helping out others where we could. We were pillars to the community in my eyes and

I loved my shop and the people who used it.

I was the well-known, bubbly subpostmaster with a big personality and now I am a

complete introvert with little confidence and somewhat of a hermit.

I lost everything, including myself overnight.

I tried to stay on and build up my reputation, through the help of my wife and her
family I got out of bed, put on a brave face, smiled and stood, head held high behind

the counter of my shop.

However, I felt like an outcast, and I cried myself to sleep most nights. I gave up my

social life and friends. I went from being this big, bubbly personality to being a totally

recluse and I still am to this day.

Page 16 of 19
127.

128.

129.

130.

131.

132.

133.

134,

135.

136.

I do not do anything today and that has been the hardest thing for me, I just sit at

home.

I keep going for my wife and children but with the debt, I now have due to the Post
Office makes me want to give up some days. I am working on my self-worth and
mental health but until I can pay off the debts, I do not think I will ever be able to fully

move on.

I question whether my children and wife would be better off if I am not here anymore.

My relationship with my mother also broke down because of the actions of the post

office.

My marriage nearly broke up under the circumstances. I thought my wife thought I
had done it, that I had stolen the money. I did not trust anyone and I didn’t think

anyone trusted me. I thought they all hated me.

Because of these intrusive thoughts I was horrible to live with, I drank, I was

depressed and I was awful to be around.

My wife was my rock. She helped me every day and persevered. She encouraged me
to be brave and show people I had not done anything wrong and she believed

everything I said, I owe her everything.

I lost out on 2 years with my children where I wasn’t there for them. That is time I will
never get back. The post office did that, they took that time away from me and my

children.

To this day, I get nervous just driving past my old shop. Everything comes rushing back

to me when I see it.

I will never forgive the Post Office.

Page 17 of 19
137. We are holding onto our house by the skin of our teeth now. My in-laws are paying for
our house on a monthly basis because it is our family home, they are keeping a roof
over our heads.

138. I thought I would have had a job until retirement, if the post office had never taken my
business away from me I would still be working in my shop and running post office
now.

139. Instead, I am unemployed, unable to get a job, in debt and without a pension.

140. I. am half the man I used to be.

CONCLUSION

141. The Post Office ruined everything I had built.

142. Financially I have lost everything, I was earning excellent money and I was going to be
able to give my family the best life.

143. The business had so much potential, which I had planned to make the most of.
However, I am now left without my business, unemployed and unable to get a job. I
am now the househusband.

144, I have gone from a something to a nothing.

145. The Post Office not only destroyed my finances but they also completely destroyed my
relationship with my mother. We have both suffered immensely as a result of the
actions of the post office, and I hope that this inquiry can aid in reopening the lines of
communication between my mother and me.

146. I have lost a lot at the hands of the Post Office but the biggest loss of all, for me, is

losing my personality and who I was as a man. That is something I cannot get back.

Page 18 of 19
147.

148,

149,

150.

I now refuse to use a post office. I do not even like mentioning their name because I
feel like the Post Office have gotten away with the destruction they caused so many

people.

It makes me so angry that what they have done is unknown and they could easily do it

again. I would hate for anyone else to have to go through what I have been through.

Financial compensation is my number one priority to come out of the inquiry. I want
to be able to get on with my life and not worry about whether a bailiff will turn up. We

should be compensated for what we have lost and what we should have been earning.

I also want everyone to be made aware of what the Post Office have done, and that
includes those in management at the time who did nothing to help or support the

‘little man’.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.

Signed...

Kevin Palmer

Page 19 of 19