POL00048655
POL00048655
18-MAY-2087 16:09 FROM:SOVEREIGN CHAMBERS { TO GRO P.15/18
Mick F Matthews To; Juliet McFarlane/e/POSTOFFICE @POSTOFFICE
11/05/2007 10:56
cc:
Subject; Miss Janet Louise Skinner
Juliet
As discussed yesterday I have finally got around to examining Miss Skinners Bank statements, As I
result of this I have forwarded the following E mails to HBoS tor further enquiry
E mail 10 May p07. dot mail 11 May 2007.dor
I feel that for the effective conduct of the investigation these enquiries need to be undertaken, however
Jart not confident that they will reveal futher assels. As such I am of the view that we should go a
head and get aIConliscation Order on the 25 May 2007, as long as if necessary we can revisit the
Confiscation Order in accordance with Section 22 of the POCA 2002, Order made: reconsideration of
available amount, it my enquiries do reveal significant further assets. Can you advise if this course of
action can be flowed
Secondly, a cash payments were made into Miss Skinner's accounts as detailed below, (a note of
caution the £14isk payment is detailed as a cash payment but it may not be as a Cheque was issued
following a loanifor £14.5K at the same time, enquires into this matter are ongoing with the loan
provider Kensington Mortgages Ltd)
You can see that after Miss Skinner was interviewed by Diane Matthews on the 1st Jun 06, she paid
quite an amount of cash into her accounts. There is no directly corresponding cash withdrawals from
the other account to explain the deposits and I suspect that these are deposits of stolen money.
However Miss Skinner generally withdraws a (ot of cash in smaller amounts from the accounts overall
and am sure that she would explain the deposit by saying that she had saved the money over a period
of time or somelother lame explanation. In the circumstances t feel that this matter should not be
pursued as our fesources could be better spent on more pressing matters, Do you agree?
Date I ‘ount ount
22-Sep-06 into Bus Act H #2,07060
21-JurO6 iin to Bus Ace! [ £14,500.00
13-Jul-06 into Bus Acc! ! £150.00
73-Jul-06 into Bus Acc! i £200.00
26-Jun-06 into Bus Acc! i £640.00
16-Jun-06 into Bus Acc! i £500.00)
9-Jun-06 into Bus Acc; i £300.00)
Bun-06 into Bus Ace: GRO: £600.00
19-Qcl-05 into Bus Acc! i £400.09
19-Oct-05 into Per Acc I i £100.01
4-Apr-05 lin to Per Acc ¢ { £400.00)
T-Mar-08 lin to-Bus Acc! I £80.00]
22-Dec-04 into Bus Acc! i £200.00)
17-Sep-04 nto Bus Acc! ! £650.00)
16-Aug-04 in to Bus Acd_ J £7,840.00
I
Finally I will update my Statement of Information in respect of the increase in the value of money and
the increase in thé value of the House. The relevant figures are out on Tuesday. I am of the view that
following the judgement in the Thomas case at Mold I should put in a paragraph asking for the
remuneration to be removed as benefit. do you concur.
Regards Mick
POL00048655
POL00048655
18-MAY-2007 16:10 FROM:SOUEREIGN CHAMBERS P.16718
Accredited Financial Investigator
Post Office Ltd Investigation Team
PO Box 1
Croydon
CR9 1WN
T
“TAKING THE GASH OUT OF CRIME!