Page 1 of 2
I Reg x
Thomas Penny
From: —
Sent: \
an
To: john.! longman I
Ce: Thomas Penny
Subject: Fw: REGINA v SEEMA MISRA - CRM/258932/JSX/PT __POH- 5344) _
Attachments: 258932M8.doc; 258932L13.doc
John,
A good letter - I like it.
Any response will probably have to await my return from leave, unless urgent, in which case liaise with
Security/Jason/Tash.
- Penny,
For info.
Regards,
Dave Posnett
Fraud Risk Manager
Security Suite (G14), Leatherhead DO, Station Rd, Leatherhead, KT22 7AE
Spread the word.
BATHE en
Stop the crime
John Longman
To: Dave Posnette/POSTOFFICE@POSTOFFICE
ce:
14/08/2009 12:19 Subject
Fw: REGINA v SEEMA MISRA - CRM/258932/JSX/PT
03/09/2009
FUJ00154851
FUJ00154851
Page 2 of 2
Regards,
Jon Longrnan
Seaurity Advisor,
Post Office Ltd, National Security Team
S: Post Office Investigati on Dept, Watford
Spread they
LAND LINE PHONE:
MOBILE NO‘ @ MOBEXt” J (d eval
john longrranI_ ___GRO
Confidential Information: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient (5) and may contain™ -
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited,
Jf you are not the intended recipient, plea 2 contact me by replye-mailand destroy afi copies of the original’ MES
?? Please consider the environment before printing this e-rnail
~- Forwarded by John Longman/e/POSTOFFICE on 14/08/2009 12:18
Phil Taylor
Sent by: Marilyn Benjamin To: Post Office Security@POSTOFFICE
cc: John Longman/e/POSTOFFICE@POSTOFFICE
Subject’ REGINA v SEEMA MISRA - CRM/258932/JSX/PT
14/08/2009 11:35 GUILDFORD CROWN COURT
TRIAL — 30TH NOVEMBER: 2009
CASE NO: POLTD/0708/0249
Please see the attached advice in the above case together with letter to Defence.
Phil Taylor
Legal Executive
Criminal Law Division
03/09/2009
FUJ00154851
FUJ00154851
FUJ00154851
FUJ00154851
Memo Royal Mail
The Real Network
16" August 2008 Legal Services
3 Floor
Post Office Security Ga Eccleston Street
ce. Jon‘ Longman Victoria
LONDON SWIW SLT
REGINA v SEEMA MISRA
GUILDFORD CROWN COURT
TRIAL - 30 NOVEMBER 2009
CASE NO: POLTD/0708/0249
don,
Here is a letter which I have.written to the Defence and copied to Counsel for your information.
Phil Taylor
Legal Executive
Criminal Law Division
phil taylor
Ref: CRM/258932/JSX/PT
Royal Mal 2002 - Page I of
Royal Malis tretingvameof Ray Mal Group pe Registered number 4138203,
ogistered in England and Wels. Registered fice: 48 Old Street LONDON, ECV SHO
(4° August 2008
The Castle Partnership
Solicitors
20a High Street
WOKING
GU21 BBW
Our Ref: CRM/258932/JSX/PT
Your Ref: OTC/CC
Dear Sirs
REGINA v SEEMA MISRA
GUILDFORD CROWN COURT
TRIAL - 30” NOVEMBER 2009
I understand fram Prosecuting Counsel that on the last occasion Defence Counsel asked for Horizon data for the
period during which your Client was Subpostmistress.at West Byfleet Sub Post Office. As you may be aware the
Horizon system is a product of Fujitsu Limited and the Post Office has purchased this system fram Fujitsu in the
same way that any other company wauld purchase goods or services for its business. Other than that Fujitsu is
not in any way an associated company of the Post Office.
The request has been put to Fujitsu and a reply has been received by the person who liaises with this company.
The data will take some 6-8 weeks to produce. Additionally your Client made.107 calls to the Horizon Helpdesk
during her period of tenure which: equates to roughly 2-3 calls-per month. In order to provide the data Fujitsu
will wish to know exactly what is required and for exactly what period. Please could you also advise as to why
you consider the data relevant. You will already have the Notice of Additional Evidence fram Andrew Dunks of -
Fujitsu dealing with the calls to the Helpdesk.
The retrieval of data by Fujitsu is not a free service. It is very expensive and depends upon the amount of data
which has to be retrieved which is why you are requested to be very precise. At that stage a firm quotation can
be obtained and Counsel will be asked to give further advice as to disclosure and payment for this service. The
Post Office will not underwrite the cost if Counsel considers the data irrelevant. You will of.course be aware that
the same system operates throughout the country and was not particular to your Client's Sub Past Office.
I have set out the matter above quite clearly because in the past many thausands of pounds have been spent on
obtaining this type of data subsequent to which a late plea of Guilty is tendered which means that the exercise
has been a complete waste of time and money.
In view of the timescale please could you let me have your reply at your earliest convenience.
Yours faithfully
‘BRoyal Mall 2002 - Page lof 2
FUJ00154851
FUJ00154851
Legal Services
3 Floor
Ga Ecclestan Street
Victoria
LONDON SWIW SLT
wow Fayalmail. com
FUJ00154851
FUJ00154851
Phil Taylor
Legal Executive
Criminal Law Division
phitaylot GRO
{8 Royal Mal 2002 - Page 2 of 2
dt \prafles \thomasp europe local setting \teinporary internet fies ltl \25B9S2I doe