FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
From: Gareth Jenkins[gi.jenkins
Sent: Wed 30/01/2019 2:52:46 PM (UTC)
To: ; ‘Jonathan
Gribben'fjonathan.
Christopher. Jay@.
Legal.DefenceG.
Ce: .
ts Bremner'[lucy.bremner@._,
; ParkerSP€ _
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes
[WBDUK-AC.FID27032497]
IMPORTANT - This email or attached documents contains legal advice (or relates to litigation or anticipated litigation) and is being provided in
circumstances for which Legal Privilege may be claimed. Do not copy or forward this document without permission.
Hi Jonny,
To add to Pete’s response, we wouldn’t have been aware of EPOSS transactions either. All transactions were
effectively controlled by Reference data which was managed by POL. All the offline Banking and Giro Bank
transactions I mentioned were EPOSS Transactions. As far as Horizon was concerned, a button was visible at the
counter which allowed the transaction to be recorded and enabled a value (and often an associated fee) to be
captured and then Horizon would settle the stack. What the transaction meant in the “real world” or what other
associated paper work was produced was totally outside of our knowledge. At the end of the customer session the
stack could then be settled — initially using cash or cheques, but after late 2003, Debit Cards were also supported. One
key difference between a Post Office and most retail stores is that some transactions resulted in money being paid to
the customer rather than the customer paying. It was this additional complexity that meant a standard retail solution
wasn’t appropriate.
In particular, the set of transactions in each branch would vary (again controlled by Ref Data.
Best wishes
Gareth
From: pete.newsomeG.
Sent: 30 January 2019 14:06
To: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribben@;
Christopher.Jay@. Legal.Defence:
Cc: Andrew Parsons <andrew.parsons@_
<lucy.bremner@_ -
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
[mailto:pete.newsome@
>; Gareth Jenkins <gi.jenkins@
Lucy Bremner
IMPORTANT - This email or attached documents contains legal advice (or relates to litigation or anticipated litigation) and is being provided in
circumstances for which Legal Privilege may be claimed. Do not copy or forward this document without permission.
Jonny
There are a number of transactions that are controlled by the Mails or on line banking software that Fujitsu would
have knowledge of but since the introduction of AP and APADC Fujitsu would not necessarily know for what
organisations or details of the business outcomes of a many of the transactions on Horizon. Post Office may have a
current and past list of these transactions on the system.
Pete
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Pete Newsome
Account Manager
Account, Fujitsu UK&l
ai
Web: hitp /uk fulitsu.com
Web: uk.fujitsu.com
My normal working week is Monday to Thursday
© f/¥iin/elc-
Pree
S ‘Fujitsu named as ee
Responsible Business air
of the Year
Fujitsu is proud to partner with Action for Children
I-ClO: Global Intelligence for the ClO. Fujitsu's online resource for ICT leaders
Sponsors of the 2015 Rugby World Cup
wv Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
To meet with the new GDPR regulations we are reviewing our opt-in preferences. If you are happy to give opt-in consent to continue receiving relevant
marketing communications please visit this link and simply enter your email
From: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribben@ GRO >
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 1:41 PM I
To: Gareth Jenkins <Bi enkins@ Newsome, Pete <pete. newsome¢
. >; Defence Legal (Chris Jay,) <Legal.Defence@ _
Cc: Andrew Parsons <andrew. parsons@ ; Ibbett, Dave <Dave.Ibbett@
<lucy.. bremner@ GRO >; Parker, Steve <ParkersPe
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
>; Jay, Christopher
Lucy Bremner
Hi Gareth,
Thank you for this.
Is there a list of transactions that could be conducted in Post Office branches? Or a list of transactions that Post
Office asked FJ to make possible on Horizon?
Kind regards
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
womblebonddickinson.com
DICKINSON y ©
i.jenkins'
From: Gareth Jenkins [mailto:
Sent: 30 January 2019 12:52 -
To: Jonathan Gribben; pete.newsome@ Christopher. Jay@ GRO
Cc: Andrew Parsons; Dave. Ibbett¢ } Lucy Bremner; ParkerSP@”
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
IMPORTANT - This email or attached documents contains legal advice (or relates to litigation or anticipated litigation) and is being provided in
circumstances for which Legal Privilege may be claimed. Do not copy or forward this document without permission.
Hi Jonny,
Please see responses below prefixed [GJ].
NB these are all really process questions which need to be considered by POL. I have no real knowledge of the paper
trails that exist and how they are reconciled, though I have been involved in projects to try and remove some of the
paper trails more recently.. I know POL were trying to remove as much of that as possible and this was certainly
possible with online banking, but back in 2000 to 2004 (which is what we are looking at) there was a lot more paper
about.
Best wishes
Gareth
From: Jonathan Gribben [mailto:jonathan.gribben cm
Sent: 30 January 2019 11:31
To: Gareth Jenkins <gi.jenkins@
GRO
4; Christopher Jay@
Cc: Andrew Parsons <andrew.parsons@____ GRO b; Dave.Ibbett@ GRO} Lucy Bremner
<lucy.bremneré
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Importance: High
Hi Gareth,
Further to my email below, please would you be able to answer the following questions ASAP today?
1. Could FJ have inserted transactions which had the effect of making deposits into PO savings accounts, ISAs
etc.?
[G1] I don’t think these existed back in 2000 to 2004. It realy comes down to the paper trail.
2. If so, would they have been detectable (like a Giro Bank transaction would be detectable due to the
reconciliation between Horizon records and the paper trail)
[GI] need to check with POL
3. If not, why was it not possible for FJ have inserted transactions which had the effect of making deposits into
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
PO savings accounts, ISAs etc.?
[GIJ] Main reason is such products didn’t exist then, and I would have expected there to be some sort of paper trail.
NB POL would also be concerned about Postmasters injecting such transactions.
4. What is the significance of the introduction of online banking in 2003? Could FJ have injected a transaction
into a third party bank account after the introduction of online banking? If not, why not?
[GU] No they couldn’t. With online banking any Banking transaction (including deposits) was initially sent
electronically to the bank before it was completed at the counter. The daily banking reconciliation then compared
the details that the banks had of all transactions with the horizon feed. The electronic feed to the bank was digitally
signed and so couldn’t be generated by support staff, only the horizon record of the completed transaction could be
injected, and reconciliation would soon pick that up, and more importantly, it was the signed electronic version that
the banks accepted as a deposit!
Kind regards
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
womblebonddickinson.com
DICKINSON vy ©
From: Jonathan Gribben
Sent: 30 January 2019 10:07
To: 'Gareth Jenkins'; pete.newsome:
Cc: Andrew Parsons; Dave. Ibbett¢ GRO
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
+ Leaal.Defenced__
3, Christopher.Jay@
Hi Gareth,
Thank you for the clarification. We will pick this up with Post Office.
No need for you to re-read Steve's statement, but thanks for the offer.
Kind regards
Jonny
d
From: Gareth Jenkins [mailto:gi.jenkins@
Sent: 30 January 2019 07:22
To: pete.newsome@ ; Legal.Defence@™
Cc: Andrew Parsons; Dave. Ibbett@
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes
Jonathan Gribben
IMPORTANT - This email or attached documents contains legal advice (or relates to litigation or anticipated litigation) and is being provided in
circumstances for which Legal Privilege may be claimed. Do not copy or forward this document without permission.
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Hi Jonny,
Sorry, but you didn’t send me the actual question until I’d gone off line around 4ish yesterday, so other than the
phone call I had from Pete, I didn’t see the emails until late last night.
A further clarification:
1. The Giro Bank Transactions are not AP, but standard EPOSS Transactions. I don’t know how info on them got
to Giro Bank — it may well be that Giro Bank worked off the paper trail and then sent summaries to POL which
they then reconciled with the Horizon feed. POL would need to provide the details.
2. Prior to online banking (introduced in 2003), POL did support some (but not all) other banks with deposit and
cheque cashing facilities. Again these were EPOSS (not AP) transactions. I assume that there was also a paper
trail here and it would work in a similar way to Giro Bank. Again it is POL that need to define the process. All
Horizon did was provide the buttons to record the electronic part of the transaction.
Is there any point in me re-reading Steve’s statement? I’m out this morning, but could do so this afternoon.
Hope this helps.
Best wishes
Gareth
From: pete.newsome@ mailto:pete.newsome@
Sent: 29 January 2019 19:45 .
To: ChristopherJay¢ GRO }, Legal.Defence
Ce: andrew.parsons@ Dave.Ibbett@
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes
§ jonathan.
Jonny
I read out the questions and then interpreted Gareth's answers into my own words.
Pete
Sent from my Android phone using Symantec TouchDown (www.symantec.com)
ooo Original Message----- ee
From: Jonathan Gribben [jonathan.gribben@
Received: Tuesday, 29 Jan 2019, 17:33
To: Newsome, Pete [pete.newsome:
Legal (Chris Jay,) [Legal.Defence@,
CC: Andrew Parsons [andrew.parsons:
[gi.jenkins@_ z]
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes
Jay, Christopher [Christopher Jay@' ]; Defence
_j; Ilbbett, Dave [Dave.Ibbett@ I; Gareth Jenkins
Pete,
Thanks. When you say you have had to interpret, do you mean interpret my email and/or what Gareth has said, or do
you mean you passed on my email and Gareth confirmed that it is correct?
Kind regards
Jonny
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.
womblebonddickinson.com
DICKINSON Ain)
[mailto:pete.newsome¢
To: Jonathan Gribben; Christopher.Jay. ; Legal.Defence¢ GRO i
Cc: Andrew Parsons; Dave. Ibbett a Gareth Jenkins
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
From: pete.newsome@ ~
Sent: 29 January 2019 17:22
IMPORTANT - This email or attached documents contains legal advice (or relates to litigation or anticipated litigation) and is being provided in
circumstances for which Legal Privilege may be claimed. Do not copy or forward this document without permission.
Jonny
I talked to Gareth and the answer is below. I have had to interpret as Gareth was not able to send a response.
Pete
Pete Newsome
Account Manager
st_Office Account, Fujitsu UK&l
My normal working week is Monday to Thursday
© f/¥iin/e\c-
fujitsu named as
oT cionsible Business
of the Year
I-CIO: Global Intelligence for the ClO. Fujitsu’s online resource for ICT leaders
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Sponsors of the 2015 Rugby World Cup
wy Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
To meet with the new GDPR regulations we are reviewing our opt-in preferences. If you are happy to give opt-in consent to continue receiving relevant
marketing communications please visit this link and simply enter your email
From: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribben@ GRO >
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:04 PM
To: Newsome, Pete <pete.newsome@
Cc: Andrew Parsons <andrew.parsons@
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement:
AC.FID27032497]
; Jay, Christopher <Christoph:
">; Ibbett, Dave <Dave.IIbbett
le examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
Yes it has been sent to Gareth, but it is:
How is it possible for SSC to inject a GIRO bank transfer into a set of branch accounts but it isn't possible to
inject another bank deposit? Gareth’s answer Giro Bank paying in was possible into accounts by AP as it was
introduced before on line banking so you needed was the account number and detailed knowledge of the
system so theoretically it was possible. But there was a paper work trail to back this up that the sub-postmaster
had to send in to POL which should then reconcile to the AP transaction file from Horizon. (Post Office would
understand how it worked). A report was produced daily to reconcile against the Horizon feed, any discrepancy
Post Office may find where the paper work was not present would be discussed with the branch at the time.
Post Office can describe what would happen if the paperwork was not available.
Steve thinks the answer is:
I think the answer is that Giro bank is also an AP transaction (like bill payments). It is the only type of bank
account that is. All other banking deposits go through a totally different path. There may have been other
banks who had similar facilities before on line banking was introduced in 2004? but you would have to ask
Post Office as they were AP transactions.
Thanks
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.
womblebonddickinson.com
A)
j[mailto:pete.newsomeG —
From: pete.newsome@
Sent: 29 January 2019 16:59
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
To: Jonathan Gribben; Christophe:
Cc: Andrew Parsons; Dave. Ibbett
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Hi
What is the question? Has it been sent to Gareth already?
Pete
Pete Newsome
Account Manager
DHL_and Post Office Account, Fujitsu UK&l
Tel:
E-Mail: pete.newsomef, GRO.
Web: http:/uk.fujitsu.com
Web: uk.fujitsu.com
My normal working week is Monday to Thursday
© fI¥inIe\c-
&
RY poste
Fujitsu named as oe
Responsible Business s3giun
of the Year
Fujitsu is proud to partner with Action for Children
-CIO: Global Intelligence for the ClO. Fujitsu's online resource for ICT leaders
Sponsors of the 2015 Rugby World Cup
wv Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
To meet with the new GDPR regulations we are reviewing our opt-in preferences. If you are happy to give opt-in consent to continue receiving relevant
marketing communications please visit this link and simply enter your email
From: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribben@
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 4:58 PM
To: Newsome, Pete <pete.newsome@. GRO >; Jay, Christopher <Christopher.Jayé
Cc: Andrew Parsons <andrew.parsons@
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Pete,
Steve has signed his statement and we are holding it subject to one point that Gareth Jenkins needs to check. Can
you make contact with Gareth and ask him to do that ASAP please?
Kind regards
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
womblebonddickinson.com
WOMBLE
BOND
DICKINSON y ©
From: pete.newsomeG I
Sent: 29 January 2019 16:49 ~
To: Jonathan Gribben; Christopher.Jay¢ GRO
Cc: Andrew Parsons
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
[mailto:pete.newsome:
Jonny
Is available for a call now. Try his mobile. 5.30 is when he needs to stop..
Pete
Pete Newsome
Account Manager
LOffice Account, Fujitsu UK&l
Web: http://uk.fujitsu.com
Web: uk.fujitsu.com
My normal working week is Monday to Thursday
© f/¥iin/e\c-
© Fujitsu famed as
Responsible Business
of the Year
Fujitsu is proud to partner with
I-CIO: Global Intelligence for the ClO. Fujitsu's online resource for ICT leaders
Sponsors of the 2015 Rugby World Cup
Kv Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
To meet with the new GDPR regulations we are reviewing our opt-in preferences. If you are happy to give opt-in consent to continue receiving relevant
marketing communications please visit this link and simply enter your email
From: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribben@
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 4:41 PM
To: Jay, Christopher <ChristopherJa ; Newsome, Pete <pete.newsomeG I
Cc: Andrew Parsons <andrew.parsons@
Subject: FW: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Chris, Pete,
We are close to finalising Steve's statement and it really needs to go today, but he is saying he isn't available after
5:30. Would you be able to speak to him to explain the importance of this please?
Kind regards
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP.
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
womblebonddickinson.com
WOMBLE
/ BOND
DICKINSON y ©@
mailto:ParkerSP@ GRO
From: ParkerSP@
Sent: 29 January
To: Jonathan Gribben
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes
No, can’t be available after 5:30
From: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribben@
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 4:21 PM
To: Parker, Steve <ParkerSP@
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes
Steve,
I should have said, we really do need to get this out today. Are you available this evening?
Thanks
Jonny
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
GRO
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
womblebonddickinson.com
WOMBLE
BOND
DICKINSON y ©
From: Jonathan Gribben
Sent: 29 January 2019 16:13,
To: 'ParkerSP@
Cc: Matthew.Lenton@ D I GRO Lucy Bremner; John.Simpkins@~
Andrew Parsons
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Steve,
Thank you for this. Updated version attached. We are down to one point to bottom out, which is the GIRO bank
theory in para. 35. The bit we are struggling with is that it if it is possible to deposit money in a Giro bank account, how
is it not possible to deposit money in a normal account. Why is a paper slip necessary for this type of account?
It might be worth having a quick call on this. Are you free?
Kind regards
Jonny
} [mailto:ParkerSP@ GRO }
From: ParkerSF.
Sent: 29 January 2019 14:47
To: Jonathan Gribben....
Cc: Matthew.Lenton@ _ Dave. Ibbett@ ucy Bremner; John.Simpkins@
Andrew Parsons
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Latest comments / change marked
Steve
From: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribbeng_.GRO__I>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2 A
To: Parker, Steve <ParkerSP
impkins, John <John.Simpkins@
; Andrew Parsons.
<andrew.parsons@.
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Importance: High
Steve,
Please see attached the updated version of your statement and a comparison showing the changes made.
Can we discuss the comments at 2:00pm please?
Kind regards
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
womblebonddickinson.com
Sm)
From: ParkerSP@...
Sent: 29 January 2019 10:52
To: Jonathan Gribben
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Yes, will do
From: Jonathan Gribben <jonathan.gribben@
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 20:
To: Parker, Steve <ParkerSP@
Cc: Lenton, Matthew <Matthew.Lenton@ ; t, De
>; Simpkins, John <John.Simpkins@ _ i
<gi.jenkins@. (gi.jenkins@ _ “T <gi.jenkins@ GRO >
Subject: RE: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes [WBDUK-
AC.FID27032497]
Steve,
Thank you for this.
I'm working on the statement now — next (and hopefully final version) will be with you within 30 minutes. We need to
get it out today, so please can you review on receipt? I'll send you a comparison so you can easily see the changes
made.
Kind regards
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Jonny
Jonathan Gribben
Managing Associate
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP
Stay informed: sign up to our e-alerts
womblebonddickinson.com
WOMBLE
BOND
DICKINSON vy ©
From: ParkerSP@
Sent: 29 January
To: Jonathan Gribben__
Cc: Matthew.Lenton@ Gi 1; Lucy Bremner; John.Simpkins@
Gareth Jenkins <qi.jenkins@
Subject: SP Second Witness Statement: Possible examples to use - effective software fixes
IMPORTANT - This email or attached documents contains legal advice (or relates to litigation or anticipated litigation) and is being provided in
circumstances for which Legal Privilege may be claimed. Do not copy or forward this document without permission.
Jonny, we’ve been looking at some potential examples to use within the witness statement. Suggest WBD have a look
and decide if it is useful to add them as examples?
Effective Software Fixes
Pcoos9918: PSteed2847N - reverse a rem, but when this has been reversed it is doubling up on a
balance
+ve: Already mentioned in statement but still shows a quick software error turn round
28/04/03: SSC (Paul Steed) identified error
28/04/03: Paul Steed updated and sent to MSU to handle discrepancy with FAD & POL
30/04/03: Development identify error
01/05/03: Work Package generated: PWY_WP_16353 B3S30R
07/05/03: Tested on LST. Fix released.
09/05/03: I have spoken to the PM to say that the software fix was sent down and became active on 07-May-2003
and so there should be no recurrences of the original problem.
PC0123699: 28/07/05 ...payments and receipts are mismatched...PM states he was balancing on node
2 but there was discrepancies..
-ve: Initial SSC response was erroneous, to send back to Helpdesk.
+ve: Fast fix to live for financial issue
+ve: Demonstrates passing to MSU to tie up financial impact with POL
+ve: Example of looking at more than one site, diligence identifying other sites with issue
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
+ve: Shows how an initial R&P error is seen by PM and support are subsequently able to identify other events that tie
it in to other sites
28/07/05: Incorrectly sent back by SSC ...Balancing problems should be dealt with initially by NBSC...
28/07/05: ... Have spoken with the PM and advised...All that remains now is for us to try and identify the root cause of
the discrepancy which may take a while. As per usual we will forward our findings on to the MSU who will advise POL
accordingly...
29/07/05 With development. Work Package PWY_WP_22602 generated
01/08/05: BI3S80R_WP22602 is now ready for test
02/08/05: Release PinICL PC0123865
08/08/05: This has passed testing in LST and is being returned to RM for live pilot.
09/08/05: sent out to the Pilot 100 successfully
05/09/05: Applied to all live outlets and now in the live Generic Prodlists roll-outs using both S70 and $80 spares
When the PM went to produce a trail balance a discrepancy was shown but at the bottom the receipts and payment
totals did not match.
The £170 discrepancy was down to an APS txn message that had no product number and no primary or secondary
mappings. There was a critical event raised on 21st Jul on counter 9 which helped to identify this (Event Id:4 with the
text "Error Message: Failed to generate EPOSSCore transaction grammar").
As the txn message was incomplete it was omitted from the rollover 'calculations' and thus caused the discrepancy
reported.
When I checked the tivoli event archives yesterday I found that 216 of these events had been logged in the past 7 days
at different offices/counters
Looks like whenever the event is raised it is either down to a cancelled quantum txn
Have checked out a sample of 40 to 50 sites and they're all at S80 so its probably safe to assume its an S80 problem.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Please consider the environment! Do you need to print this email?
ised to access this e=
The information in this e-mail and any attachments i ial and may be legally privileged and prote
ts. If you are not parkerspy
mn, distribution, publication or copying
2 -d by law. parkerspdng
please notify jonathan gribben(7-~gi8~7—} as soon as possibl
ion or attachments is prohibited and may be unlawful. Informa
horised use,
mail an
dissemi
Privacy Policy on our website
Any ‘ached to this e-mail will have been checked by us with virus detection software before transmission. Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP accepts no liability for any
loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses and you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment
Content of this email which does not relate to the official business of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP, is neither given nor endorsed by it.
This email is sent by Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP whi imited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC317661. Our registered office
is 4 More London Riverside, London, SE open to inspection, We use th to a member of the LLP, or an employee
or consultant who is of equivalent 27.
autonomous law firms providing
sonsible for the a
v. Please see
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
FUJ00161750
FUJ00161750
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No
96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker
Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu
Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes
Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may
be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is
virus-free.